A global purpose driven coalition of everyone named Chris Wright, united by a common objective, to right all of US Energy Secretary Chris Wright's wrongs.
@SecretaryWright As an Energy Secretary for the United States of America, maybe try and stop millions of wasted spending on fossil subsidies. We didn't hire you to make israel great again. #MAGA
NEW from me: China's CO2 emissions fell ~1.6% in the first quarter and have now been flat or down for more than a year. This is the first time on record that emissions are falling due to clean energy growth, not slow power demand.
@RapidResponse47@SecretaryWright@POTUS There has to be logic to your lies! I can't find it. I'm assuming there is some logic. Cause how in the world are you going to bully the world into increasing US energy imports?
Just because it worked last time, does not mean it'll work again. It's 2025, not 2016!
@SecretaryWright You can't bring in the next generation if you are stuck on the energy choice of the past. The new generation demands the next generation of energy sources. Clean, renewable, and unlimited!
@RealJohnShoe@SecretaryWright@ENERGY Bruh, he is exactly saying the opposite of what you're asking. He is trying to bail out a dying industry that can no longer compete with cheap alternatives. Coal has been dying slowly since 2008....
@SecretaryWright@ENERGY More coal means more pollution, more expensive utility bills, more backwards economy, more dependence on climate wrecking energy source - the only one who wins from this are fossil fool energy company bosses! The average American continues to suffer #MAGA or #NOMAGA
@ChrisWr99942031 @nexteraenergy Of the few projects initiated, most have been canned. One that continues is being pushed by Gates. There was a Govt feasibility study on this, a bunch of sites were identified but that study did not look at seismicity, population proximity, or other regulations required by IAEA.
CEO @nexteraenergy "We’ve got to be really careful here, from an affordability standpoint, about the choices that we’re making. What we don’t want to do is drive ourselves to only one solution, a gas-fired solution, that’s now more expensive than it ever has been in its history,”
@ChrisWr99942031 @nexteraenergy After hearing out your arguments with an open mind, I conclude, your suggestion does nothing for carbon reduction or energy transition. It's just more of the same. Solutions are available and wind and solar are already delivering in some of the most weather challenged countries.
@ChrisWr99942031 @nexteraenergy And no, you can't build a nuclear plant where coal power plants exist. There are lots of things that need to be considered, geological conditions, what availability, proximity to settlements are just a few things I can list.
@ChrisWr99942031 @nexteraenergy So you suggest wait until thorium become available?
Even when wind & solar is a cheaper, scalable, and dispatchable option. Your main argument against RE is intermittency & pollution but EIA and other research available on the web prove otherwise. You don't need ChatGPT for that