Any cop who uses Flock illegally should be prosecuted.
That's why we built our auditing tools. Illegal use is identified, and then used as evidence against them.
We have more tools to catch this behavior than almost any other technology used by the police.
@therealmcnair Scatter would repair fastest because they’re spaced out but the amount of shots that area could take is tiny. Concentrated allows for the most shots, but since the grass spreads horizontally it would take a long time to reach the middle from the edges. Spaced Lines = best balance
Augusta National Chairman Fred Ridley says golf has become "one-dimensional."
"Until recent years golf has been a game of imagination, creativity, and variety. The game has become much more one-dimensional."
Great soundbite. It's also directly contradicted by the USGA's Distance Insights Project. Here's what their research actually found.
Today's long hitters are good at everything.
Report R56 measured how closely driving distance was linked to every other skill on Tour. Longer hitters have improved their approach play. They have improved their short game. They have improved their putting.
R56's conclusion: "This can be interpreted as longer hitters becoming better at the non-driving distance parts of the game, while accurate hitters were becoming worse at the non-driving accuracy parts of the game."
Read that again. The USGA concluded long hitters are becoming MORE well-rounded. The straight hitters are becoming LESS well-rounded. If anyone is getting more "one-dimensional," it's the shorter hitting accurate players, not the bombers.
Report R14 (Mark Broadie) broke down what separates the top 40 players from the field: approach shots 36%, driving 32%, short game 17%, putting 14%. The single biggest contributor to elite scoring is still approach play. Non-driving skills account for 68% of the scoring advantage.
R56 analyzed every tee shot on every par 4 and par 5 on the PGA TOUR over 15 seasons using Shotlink data. Driving distance explains 3% of scoring variance on a hole. Where your ball ends up (fairway, rough, bunker) explains 9% of scoring variance on a hole. Where you hit it matters three times more than how far you hit it.
Ridley's claim "feels" right, but feelings aren't data. The USGA's research found that today's long hitters are more well-rounded than ever, approach play still matters more than driving, and distance explains 3% of scoring variance on a hole while where the ball ends up explains 9% of the scoring variance.
The game hasn't become one-dimensional.
The best players have added dimensions.
@LouStagner Shocking how this simple statement has turned the golf world on its head and challenged “laying up to a good number” and all these old crusty held beliefs
@YipStrickler I have 22 rounds posted BUT I play a majority of my golf in leagues that have a bunch of custom rules, scrambles, guys trips with 2 man events, etc that make it so I can’t post my rounds. Doesn’t mean I don’t play A LOT.
@MrMichaelLaRosa@LouStagner I played it and the layup was no joke. You have a tiny sliver of fairway to hit. Had about a 225 yard layup. I ended up pulling it way left and ended up playing a cool punch shot through the V in the tree to 12ft
@LouStagner I’ll tell you what, I played it from the tournament tees after The Players with the grandstands still up. Those three were the most nervous I’ve ever been over a golf shot in my life.
1. Tee shot 17 (just because people ask for your entire life)
2. Layup on 16
3. Tee shot 18
Was Jack the best of his era? Yes.
Was Tiger the best of his era? Yes.
Were the fields in Jack’s era significantly weaker? Yes.
Do eras keep getting deeper and better? Yes.