Retired patriot, Love Satire, Pets, Opt Trading, Truth. Happily married. Initiators are not welcome. Absolutely đ«Crypto. Not interested in that garbage.
Just so ya know, keeping the filibuster protects the deep state from ever being held accountable. The republican party is actually protecting the criminals that ran the Russian Collusion Coup. Thanks for your attention to this matter.
Leftist Psychopath Paul Krugman Calls for "DeMAGAfication" | Jordan Conradson, The Gateway Pundit
Wackjob âeconomistâ and former New York Times columnist Paul Krugman called for supporters of the President to be eradicated through âdeMAGAfication,â openly admitting that he wants to replicate Germanyâs post-World War II denazification in the United States.
Following World War II, 400,000 Germans were detained in internment camps without due process. Krugman thinks the more than 77 million who elected Trump should face the same consequences.
âThe president of the United States is mentally ill, but everybody knows that,â he said to kick off the vlog posted on Sunday.
âIf you have been following uh some of the news, you may know that Trumpâs mental deterioration, which was obvious, has been obvious for quite a while, got even more extreme in the past few days,â he continues, describing the United States as âthe worldâs formerly greatest powerâ and Trump as a âa lunatic who has far more power than any previous president.â
So, he argues, âwe really need to do a thorough purging of the United States. We need a deMAGAfication.â
âIâm not going over the top by using a word thatâs very similar to the denazification that we pursued successfully after World War Two in Germany,â he added.
Via Bannonâs War Room:
Krugman: Obviously, we need to defang Trump as much as possible, and make sure that neither he nor anybody who follows in his footsteps has power after the next two elections. But beyond that, we really need to do a thorough purging of the United States. We need a deMAGAfication, and that is, you know, Iâm not going over the top by using a word thatâs very similar to the denazification that we pursued successfully after World War Two in Germany.
And we need something, itâs not just the mock ideology, but the whole structure of hugely unequal power, hugely unequal wealth that made this horrific moment possible. Itâs not going to be easy, but, and maybe itâs not going to be doable. We have to try.
This has to be turned around, and we should not, above all, whitewash or forget this moment. This is where a lot of forces in America have been leading. And if we donât do something beyond just getting rid of Trump, itâs going to happen again,â Krugman further argued.
This is not the first time Krugman has called for the death and demise of conservatives. The Gateway Pundit has reported extensively on Krugmanâs absurd lies, violent rhetoric, and moral corruption over the years.
Krugman has repeatedly shown hatred toward Republicans.
Krugman pushed election denialism on behalf of Hillary Clinton, saying itâs âpatrioticâ to call Trump âillegitimate.â
Krugman once called Florida seniors âwhite supremacistsâ and expressed hope that COVID-19 would kill them.
Krugman has also been found with child pornography on his computer. In defense of himself, Krugman suggested it was QAnon hacking his IP address and that he wasnât watching child porn.
https://t.co/oQjITe6jSG
I hope that happens. My best conclusion about the "Why" came from classified a DARPA slide deck. Essentially DARPA had a biodefense wet dream of being able to identify a pathogen and having industry spin up a "vaccine" in weeks to counter it. Their plan was to transition to annual mRNA flu vaccines to maintain public acceptance. Their hope was mRNA would save the day during covid and win the publics acceptance. They did their best to try and get 100% uptake so there wasn't a control group. Essentially hubris got the better of them. The whole project and response was run out of the national security council. It was a military op from the jump. The fear propaganda got most people. Disgustingly the hospitals protocol was actually what killed most people. The actual solution would have been for the public to supplement with D3. The only people who got hit bad by covid were those low in D3 (blacks, elderly and obese). FYI, if you keep your D3 at 70ng/ml you won't get sick. I know I don't.
Mind reading isnt a thing. I tried to warn everyone I possibly could. My only point wasn't trying to be superior as plenty of family have been injured and killed by the responce to covid. If people understood first principal thinking and applied it in the next situation where the proposed intervention has zero historical use more would reject the narrative built on sand. Most people at random IQ's if they looked at the underlining foundation would conclude it doesn't add up. The media admonished the public not to do their own research because they knew what a reasonable person would conclude. I argue you should look at what foundation supports the given claims.
I spent a career frequently on fraud investigations. Decades spent figuring what is and what isnt true. I've always dug to the hard pan of what do we actually know, and how do those blocks fit together and where does that take you. Most people outsource their thinking to those who have a financial interest in the decisions they take. Add in billions of outright propaganda and you get the covid disaster.
Fear drove most people to take it. But if you used first principal reasoning you wouldn't have:
1) mRNA tests on animals resulted in ADE and the animals dying.
2) No Off switch
3) No control over where the mRNA went.
4) Frame shift errors unavoidable resulting in freak proteins
5) PCR process used to create mRNA for the trials 70%+ accurate, massive vat process 50% accuracy for doses given to the public.
Those underlining facts no not support the safe and effective narrative. Using first principals one easily concludes the mRNA is not safe. My point is most people did not evaluate the claims against what was known. Instead they outsourced their thinking to others. If more people evaluated the underlying foundation vs the claims made against that foundation they wouldn't have taken the shots. Its not paranoia. Its lets see the foundation for your claims, and are those claims reasonable given the foundation. They were not.
@toobaffled My advice would be to get their D3 checked. If it's below 70ng/ml, then I personally would supplement until it's at that level. Mechanically it seems it's an immune response, and likely to the spike protein. A naturopath might be your best option.