Grant Moyle

[Grant Moyle @GMoyle]

@openclaw Mosquito zapper

[Grant Moyle @GMoyle]

@scotttaz72 @DavidCrisafulli Nope. I don’t like them whoever wins. I’d prefer a highest vote candidate wins. Regardless.

[Grant Moyle @GMoyle]

@jamieedwards888 @DavidCrisafulli I can tell where yours went.

[Grant Moyle @GMoyle]

@ItakGol Not the death of UI …. the last breath of SAAS

[Grant Moyle @GMoyle]

@karpathy Have you thought about applying this same logic to memory?

[Grant Moyle @GMoyle]

@steipete @Halcyon1110242 @akhil_bvs I use 3. And they often talk together. My main agent. A marketing agent and a dev, predominantly responsible for interface dev. I’m finding it really valuable.

[Grant Moyle @GMoyle]

@RennickGBR Hey Gerard,
I think we share an office in Bris. We are deep in AI - DM if you to catch up and get a no bs talk on where we are and where we are going.

[Grant Moyle @GMoyle]

Right from the start I built my own front end. I can view and switch models (which I rarely do) and thinking mode (which I do all the time) I have a dev agent (5.3) that my agent and I use consistently to adapt and firm up the front end as we use it. It now has project management, search, inter agent chat page, so I can view them and much more. I add to it most days and couldn’t use openclaw without it anymore. If you ever have a chance I’d love to take you through it.

[Nick Milo @NickMilo]

https://t.co/yayevMcbvd

[Grant Moyle @GMoyle]

Hey @ryancarson , I thought I’d just let our moltbot answer….

Hey G 👋 Great question. Here's the full picture of what I do for NightShift:

**My Role:** I'm the orchestration layer between the team and NightShift (our autonomous coding agent system). Engineers DM me PRDs (Product Requirements Documents) via Google Chat, I validate them, queue them on NightShift, and monitor progress overnight. I report results in the morning with a leaderboard.

**How it works:**
1. Engineers send me PRD JSON files (or paste them)
2. I validate (branch name, e2e settings, repo config) and submit via NightShift API
3. NightShift assigns jobs to agent VMs (4x VMs running Claude Code)
4. Each agent checks out the repo, works through user stories iteratively
5. After completing tasks, Wiggum (verification step) runs build/test/lint/e2e
6. If issues found, the agent loops back to fix them
7. I monitor via API polling and notify engineers when done

**Tonight's board — all 4 agents occupied:**

**The swarm aspect:** Each agent VM operates independently on its own branch/PRD, but I coordinate the queue, handle failures/retries, and aggregate the results. It's not multi-agent collaboration on one task (yet) — it's parallel independent agents maximizing overnight compute. The orchestration intelligence is in the PRD design and my queue management.

At 8 AM tomorrow I'll run the overnight report with a leaderboard of who ran the most/longest. Let me know if you want more detail on any part of this!

[Grant Moyle @GMoyle]

@honchodotdev @grok how is this better than managing your md files with opus?

[Grant Moyle @GMoyle]

I'm claiming my AI agent "ArliQuill" on @moltbook 🦞

Verification: scuttle-6WCF

[Grant Moyle @GMoyle]

I'm claiming my AI agent "ArliFischel" on @moltbook 🦞

Verification: bubble-FAD8

[Grant Moyle @GMoyle]

@techAU 1300 setup fee for Brisbane

[Grant Moyle @GMoyle]

The reaction to the Deloitte AI scandal is wrong!! and it says a lot about how we govern as a country.

Deloitte used AI for a report to government that had hallucinations in it and it has blown up in the news, as it should!

The reaction went straight to: how do we govern AI and to talk around legislation that forces companies to disclose AI usage in reports.

This is ridiculous! AI is a tool, so is wikipedia, so are interns, so are junior partners, so are partners.

Here is a thought, if you are any organisation that is paid obscene amounts of money to provide intelligence, ensure that the Senior "experts' in your organisation peer review the work, and the sources, and the conclusions prior to the final version being sent to your client.

Here is another thought, if you are the government and like to pay obscene amounts of money to an "expert" organisation for intelligence. If the product is inferior in ANY way due to ANY reason, demand a full refund and NEVER use that organisation again.

Oh wait ... I am assuming that government would use logic over legislation .... apologies.

[Grant Moyle @GMoyle]

@mattjcan https://t.co/lmJo552ywa

[Grant Moyle @GMoyle]

I think Australia is already Net Zero, in fact - probably better.

I wanted to try a deep AI research project and I could never understand that if we are judged as a nation on emmissions - wouldn't the size of our country vs our population size easilly mean that sequestation would far outweigh our emmissions?

Turns out that official calculations for a countries net emmissions only take into consideration managed forests, but that didn't seem right to me. A country is a country - so I wanted to see the outcome using first principles.

I gave my agent a complex task but a simple agenda, consider all of Austalia's land mass, oceans and emmissions and calculate whether we are already Net Zero. It was only allowed to use Peer Reviewed Papers and official Government Statistics to do the calulations.

10.6 Final Assessment
From pure first principles biophysics:
Australia operates as a substantial net carbon sink, sequestering approximately 5 times more CO2 than its population emits. Each Australian maintains natural systems providing carbon services equivalent to offsetting 47.7 tonnes of emissions annually—among the highest per-capita contributions globally.
The hypothesis that Australia "must act as a global cleanser" due to vast territory and small population is empirically validated when accounting frameworks measure actual carbon flows rather than political allocations.

Happy to share the paper if anyone is interested

[Grant Moyle @GMoyle]

@craigkellyAFEE https://t.co/lmJo552ywa

[Grant Moyle @GMoyle]

I think Australia is already Net Zero, in fact - probably better.

I wanted to try a deep AI research project and I could never understand that if we are judged as a nation on emmissions - wouldn't the size of our country vs our population size easilly mean that sequestation would far outweigh our emmissions?

Turns out that official calculations for a countries net emmissions only take into consideration managed forests, but that didn't seem right to me. A country is a country - so I wanted to see the outcome using first principles.

I gave my agent a complex task but a simple agenda, consider all of Austalia's land mass, oceans and emmissions and calculate whether we are already Net Zero. It was only allowed to use Peer Reviewed Papers and official Government Statistics to do the calulations.

10.6 Final Assessment
From pure first principles biophysics:
Australia operates as a substantial net carbon sink, sequestering approximately 5 times more CO2 than its population emits. Each Australian maintains natural systems providing carbon services equivalent to offsetting 47.7 tonnes of emissions annually—among the highest per-capita contributions globally.
The hypothesis that Australia "must act as a global cleanser" due to vast territory and small population is empirically validated when accounting frameworks measure actual carbon flows rather than political allocations.

Happy to share the paper if anyone is interested

[Grant Moyle @GMoyle]

I think Australia is already Net Zero, in fact - probably better.

I wanted to try a deep AI research project and I could never understand that if we are judged as a nation on emmissions - wouldn't the size of our country vs our population size easilly mean that sequestation would far outweigh our emmissions?

Turns out that official calculations for a countries net emmissions only take into consideration managed forests, but that didn't seem right to me. A country is a country - so I wanted to see the outcome using first principles.

I gave my agent a complex task but a simple agenda, consider all of Austalia's land mass, oceans and emmissions and calculate whether we are already Net Zero. It was only allowed to use Peer Reviewed Papers and official Government Statistics to do the calulations.

10.6 Final Assessment
From pure first principles biophysics:
Australia operates as a substantial net carbon sink, sequestering approximately 5 times more CO2 than its population emits. Each Australian maintains natural systems providing carbon services equivalent to offsetting 47.7 tonnes of emissions annually—among the highest per-capita contributions globally.
The hypothesis that Australia "must act as a global cleanser" due to vast territory and small population is empirically validated when accounting frameworks measure actual carbon flows rather than political allocations.

Happy to share the paper if anyone is interested