“If you’re thinking without writing, you only think you’re thinking.”
― Leslie Lamport
This quote lives rent-free in my head these days, now that delegating our writing to AI is more and more common.
@ryanflorence@mnmldmg And also, who says that 200 people teams are the future? My bet is that those are dead. Smaller teams will move faster and be super productive with AI, and need less coordination.
Oh sure. If we go deep enough into the future, all bets are off about anything. It's just a matter of how deep into the future. I do not imply to say that traditional human-computer interfaces will last forever. Things go fast enough that what I'm saying is maybe relevant for who knows how long. But I do not think that we'll ditch rich UIs in the next 5 years. Screens will still exist, and there are things that are faster to do manually than telling an AI (e.g. selecting from your photo library the pictures you want to send to your family vs. describing each photo verbally).
User interfaces will not disappear. We're visual animals. If anything, what will happens is that they'll migrate to increasingly be generated dynamically by AI in its responses, as it is already happening in some apps. See @openuidev
One of the best UX's the web ever produced is no longer useful.
If anything you're doing right now has to do with traditional UI/UX, you've got maybe a decade of utility in tech. User interfaces will eventually disappear.
Agents, chat, voice, infra, videos, games--that's it
One guy tweets that his team cancelled their @linear plan, and some people go rushing to declare SaaS and UI/UX dead.
But the guy that cancelled its @linear plan is building a SaaS with lots of UI/UX in it.
Also, this 👇 https://t.co/vA9U1lRalE
Issues created in @linear by people and via MCP are up 400% this year.
Another fast growing trend: more customers are building their own internal agents and using Linear as the shared layer for workflows, communication and context between people and agents.
As teams move faster, connecting goals, requests, reasoning and the work matters more, even if it sometimes happens after the fact in the review.
Here is one customer oriented example we can do in our Linear:
- Pick a top-10 customer. Ask the agent for a brief of their top requests and the reasoning we've captured
- Write it to a doc in Linear and decide what to build with some people
- Have the agent turn the decisions into projects and issues, carrying the customer requests and meeting notes with them
- Teams send their agents to work on them
- At the QBR, ask agent to generate a report and show the customer what has actually landed or them, how and why
Now multiple these kind of workflows 100 or 1000 times where someone is learning something worth fixing, or trying ideas and finding beta customers for it. Or just aligning across the team or cross function.
Not posting our revenue chart, but it looks a lot like this one