@IrenicCounselor@VPofPeePeeVol2@Polymarket Exactly. Also maybe acknowledge that it has helped catch criminals. That way people are less likely to think you just want to get away with things.
You can claim misuse all day. How about site well proven instances
@Arthera_William@Polymarket no i mean that they provide useful data that can hypothetically always be used properly. to stop crimes. like fent traffic, human trafficking, and auto theft
@chrypto41@Polymarket Yeah I agree. Iโm just engagement baiting at this point. I wanna hear their best slop.
If an individual did that legally somehow it would border on stalking. I think flock has more of an excuse but the cops and buyers are still being a bit sus.
? Not sure I understand. These cameras are meant to help police. Far be it from me to side with those who have malicious intent.
I have heard stories about how flock has helped solve crimes. Those stories along with the negative stories coming out of china inspired me to try and steal man the argument for keeping the cams.
I think there might be a middle ground here. I donโt want totalitarianism nor am I laid by flock.
Flock should not be used to perpetually track people. That is stalking unless there is probable cause. It should be a data base searchable via warrant if location of an individual is concerned or without a warrant if all they need are plates.
My point is that the good can be retained without the misuse.
Flock should not be used to perpetually track people. That is stalking unless there is probable cause. It should be a data base searchable via warrant if location of an individual is concerned or without a warrant if all they need are plates.
My point is that the good can be retained without the misuse.
Flock should not be used to perpetually track people. That is stalking unless there is probable cause. It should be a data base searchable via warrant if location of an individual is concerned or without a warrant if all they need are plates.
My point is that the good can be retained without the misuse.