Goates

Islamic content, religious discussions & apologetics.
This account is managed by Goates (@goatesology) and Realist (@viral_x4).

[Goates @Goatesology]

For centuries, both ancient Greek logicians and medieval Muslim theologians split language into two distinct categories: Literal and Metaphorical.
If you said "the lion entered the room" to describe a brave warrior, they claimed you were using a "metaphor" because the literal definition of a lion is a four-legged animal.

In Kitab al-Iman and Majmu' al-Fatawa, Ibn Taymiyyah completely revolutionized linguistics by declaring that the abstract split between literal and metaphorical language is a complete myth.
He argued that words do not have a fixed, isolated "literal" definition in a vacuum.
Instead, meaning is strictly defined by immediate context and communal usage.
If a community uses the word "lion" to mean a warrior, that is its true meaning in that context.

In Western academia, it wasn't until the 20th century that the famous philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein shook the world with his theory of "Language Games", arguing that meaning is defined entirely by its use in context.
Ibn Taymiyyah developed this advanced, usage-based semantic framework 600 years prior.

Link: https://t.co/EJlkYeaDQ3

[Goates @Goatesology]

Deuteronomy 22:28-29 is about r3pe 🍇

Thread 🧵 with Scans/Evidences 👇

[Goates @Goatesology]

@johnnyprofile General humanity bud

[Goates @Goatesology]

@RabbaniAzzyIII @nick_matau Hey @nick_matau you're getting intellectually nuked by your superiors, the Muslims. That's what happens when you debate someone who actually knows what they're talking about. Go kiss the ass of whoever pays you to humiliate yourself in public.

[Goates @Goatesology]

LOL the bible permits grape, evil book

[Goates @Goatesology]

Deuteronomy 22:28-29 is about r3pe 🍇

Thread 🧵 with Scans/Evidences 👇

[Goates @Goatesology]

Do Jinns Have Phones? Btw Phones didn't exist at the time of Ibn Taymiyyah, that makes it more crazy!!

[Goates @Goatesology]

Evidence for Biblical Corruption, more incoming in the future, so retweet all my tweets and like 🔥👇

[Goates @Goatesology]

Corruption in The Bible, PART 1.

FORGERY in the Gospel of Mark: Mark 11:26.
This verse doesn't even appear in some translations because it's a corruption, you'll see.

Thread 🧵 with the evidences for the claim 🔥

Credits: Canadian Psycho

[Goates @Goatesology]

New evidence for Hijab obligation in early Christianity!!

[Goates @Goatesology]

This christian document orders otherwise, the Christian women must cover themselves outside of formal church worship.
And Btw many Church Fathers praised Hijab/Niqab and ordered this for public life.

[Goates @Goatesology]

This christian document orders otherwise, the Christian women must cover themselves outside of formal church worship.
And Btw many Church Fathers praised Hijab/Niqab and ordered this for public life.

[Goates @Goatesology]

This christian document orders otherwise, the Christian women must cover themselves outside of formal church worship.
And Btw many Church Fathers praised Hijab/Niqab and ordered this for public life.

[Jerome Chukwuwem @JeromeChukwuwem]

This is restricted to worship in the temple. Not out on the street

[Goates @Goatesology]

Corruption in The Bible, PART 1.

FORGERY in the Gospel of Mark: Mark 11:26.
This verse doesn't even appear in some translations because it's a corruption, you'll see.

Thread 🧵 with the evidences for the claim 🔥

Credits: Canadian Psycho

[Goates @Goatesology]

Corruption in The Bible, PART 1.

FORGERY in the Gospel of Mark: Mark 11:26.
This verse doesn't even appear in some translations because it's a corruption, you'll see.

Thread 🧵 with the evidences for the claim 🔥

Credits: Canadian Psycho

[Goates @Goatesology]

For centuries, both ancient Greek logicians and medieval Muslim theologians split language into two distinct categories: Literal and Metaphorical.
If you said "the lion entered the room" to describe a brave warrior, they claimed you were using a "metaphor" because the literal definition of a lion is a four-legged animal.

In Kitab al-Iman and Majmu' al-Fatawa, Ibn Taymiyyah completely revolutionized linguistics by declaring that the abstract split between literal and metaphorical language is a complete myth.
He argued that words do not have a fixed, isolated "literal" definition in a vacuum.
Instead, meaning is strictly defined by immediate context and communal usage.
If a community uses the word "lion" to mean a warrior, that is its true meaning in that context.

In Western academia, it wasn't until the 20th century that the famous philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein shook the world with his theory of "Language Games", arguing that meaning is defined entirely by its use in context.
Ibn Taymiyyah developed this advanced, usage-based semantic framework 600 years prior.

Link: https://t.co/EJlkYeaDQ3