PulseChain is better than zcash $zec. Why? Well Zcash was just emergency patched, and the network down for many, because a vulnerability was discovered, and patched, but its impossible to know if it was ever exploited, unless an exploiter confessed. It's a funny property of most privacy coins, that you can't detect if someone inflation bug (minted a bunch of free coins) or not, because you can't actually count up the total supply.
PulseChain is safer software. Ethereum is PulseChain's testnet, and it's a wonderful test net!
OKX posted an article about Richard Heart and HEX
Let's make it go viral and show some gratitude to @okx for doing this.
Thank you @okx@wallet, the #PulseChain community really appreciates this, we would also like to ask you about considering for a $PLS listing, thank you.
$PLS $PLSX $HEX
Let’s show @Rabby_io and @MEXC that they made a BIG mistake by removing #PulseChain
Retweet so they'll see how many we are, regret and maybe think again about it
$PLS $PLSX $HEX $PRVX
Brother…. Just call it good. You have proved your point. America is NO longer a place for free speech. Unless you are brown or a wigger that has cucked to earn their spot. Let’s move onto making this place Great Again… for Americans. The way they did it to America….covertly 1776
The PulseChain Train is coming to town, passing all barriers and breaking all resistances. Post exactly which things you think people most be most excited to know, including PulseX and HEX. If you were writing someone a heartfelt letter, what would you want them to know?
Before AI the threat to you from the global panopticon of surveillance was theoretical. AI made it real. It's quite affordable to mine all the things you've ever said you've ever made to make a case against you. You're fucked. They only need to point the eye of Sauron at you.
🏆 Happy anniversary to the greatest legal victory in crypto history. 🏆
One year ago today, the clerk signed the final judgment and officially closed the case.
Complete victory for @RichardHeartWin .
The SEC came with everything.
$1 billion securities claim.
Fraud allegations.
They even tried to sue software code.
And after 21 long months of fighting the most powerful financial regulator on earth..
Judge Carol Bagley Amon saw through all the claims and threw it all out.
Every. Single. Claim.
“The only SEC enforcement action against a crypto participant dismissed in its entirety by a federal judge.”
That’s not a settlement.
That’s a complete victory.
Richard didn’t just fight for himself.
He fought for every builder, every holder, every person who believes open-source code is free speech.
He even fought for the people who hate him.
And he won for all of us.
HEX. PulseChain. PulseX.
More regulatory clarity than any asset in crypto.
2026 is OUR season.🫡❤️🔥
🍾 HAPPY ANNIVERSARY 🍾
#HEX #PulseChain #PulseX #RichardHeart #CryptoFreedom
I have to call out all you cowards out there. Privacy is a human right, and your forefathers died for the right for you to have privacy. Some large portion of you dgaf, and are gross for it. Cowards. Even worse, are those that actively work to destroy what your forefathers died 4
Richard Heart teaches you how bridges work. Example. Chain A to Chain B.
Coins lock on Chain A.
MAGIC
Coins mint on Chain B.
What's this MAGIC step?
Chain B doesn't know what's happening on Chain A, so TRUST must be introduced.
You have to TRUST validators to not collude with each other to lie about what happened on Chain A.
Validators could lie about how much went in on chain A, and inflation bug chain B, then some could bridge back the inflated coins and empty the original coins locked on Chain A.
What if a validator dies?
What if a validator gets hacked?
What if a validator tries to get others to collude with him to lie?
What if a validator holds his validating ransom.
Some people think that there should be a timelock over the power to try and fix the above problems. LOL.
What's the counter balance to the above problems? More trust. You might want some mechanism to add / remove, subtract the quantity of validators needed.
In the end, every single bridge has social risk, just like every single chain has social risk. They're computers, run by humans, on networks, and none of those 3 things is perfect.
You can only buy down the risk of the original sin of chain B not knowing the true state of chain A, by spreading validation geographically, and across parties and hope for the best, but you can't completely eliminate the risk. The largest hacks in crypto history have been bridge hacks.
So now ask yourself, why in this bearest of bear markets does Richard have to teach you about bridges and risks again, for the umpteenth time? As though something has changed? I've been telling you these same exact things over and over again. But I guess some need reminding, or prefer to talk about risk in every thread about benefits. Makes you wonder.
TLDR: All bridges are risk, and when done well, that risk appears to be far lower than centralized exchange risk.
You're welcome for the education. Again.
P.S. Some people have swapped bridged in tokens for native tokens, and enjoyed the experience.
P.P.S. I think some folks find it far easier to post negatively than positively. If y'all one of those, work on yourself. Consider it personal development.