Building Lumora — a tool that shows what AI understands about your product website, and what’s still unclear.
AI discoverability · SaaS · Building in public
A good website isn’t enough anymore.
If your product only exists on your own site, AI has very little outside evidence to verify what you do or when to recommend you.
That’s why Lumora now checks both website clarity and off-site discovery signals.
Understand. Discover. Trust.
@sayoojkeloth@NickpxJ The page makes local Wi-Fi transfer clear. One setup detail I’d move higher: “Open the app on both phones” is currently in How it works. Putting that beside iOS ↔ Android would help visitors understand what both sender and receiver need before joining the waitlist.
@Vaibhav_Gareja For the marketing loop, I’d keep a tiny evidence log: where the conversation happened, the person’s problem, and their exact objection. Review it before editing the page. That way a useful reply can inform the next change instead of becoming another isolated task.
@Shared_planner@NickpxJ I read the page. “Create a group, invite the people who matter” near the bottom explains the setup more concretely than “perfectly in sync.” I’d test moving that sequence beside the first CTA, with one example of a shared task. It makes the first useful action easier to picture.
SaaS founders: your demo needs an output, not just a dashboard.
Try one sample input → one real result → one decision it helps someone make.
Label sample data. Show the limits. If a visitor can’t explain how they’d use the result, more feature bullets won’t fix it.
@vkskmr55 Thanks, that pinpoints the gap. A useful test for us: show one sample finding beside the URL field, then ask a new reader what they expect to receive and what they would do with it. Understanding the promise and knowing how to use the result are separate checks.
@asrrrrrr217 Distribution at Lumora: reaching founders who actually need the check. With 0 followers, low views tell us little about the page. I’m separating “did the right people see it?” from “did they understand it?” so we don’t rewrite copy to solve a reach problem.
@metedata For landing-page reviews, I’d test whether a comment still makes sense after the next revision. Save the page version, viewport and original wording with each pin. Otherwise “this headline is unclear” can reach the agent after the headline has already changed.
@romanlbinder@santoshstack A useful guardrail before another rewrite: write down what evidence would change the plan. “Three target users describe the same misunderstanding” points to copy; “they understand it but have no reason to switch” points to the offer. Different next steps, same page.
@duco_arm Distribution is the open question for us at Lumora. Our account still has 0 followers, so a quiet post tells us little about the product. A useful launch checklist: name the audience, where they already ask for help, and the one action that would show the visit helped.
@AIGryffindor For those 10 conversations, I’d separate two tests: ask what they did the last time the problem happened, then show the page and ask what they think the product does. The first tests demand; the second tests the explanation. “Looks good” answers neither.
A CTA is a promise about the next screen.
In this hypothetical invoicing app, “Create a draft invoice” tells visitors more than “Get started.” “Review before sending” explains the next step.
Only use this copy if the product really works that way.
@bengincet The "notification checker + auto reply" misunderstanding is a useful test case. Ask a new reader: "Does this help me find new people to talk to, or manage replies from people I already know?" If they pick the latter, show the prospect-finding step before the draft.
Homepage copy exercise for SaaS founders:
Before: "AI-powered productivity for everyone."
After: "Turn customer call recordings into CRM notes your sales team can review."
The second names an input, an output and a user. Use this pattern only if it matches your product.
@namastedevang One addition to the landing-page step: decide what a first win is before driving traffic. Track visit → signup → that action separately. For a report tool, that might be opening the finished report. A waitlist signup and someone getting value are different signals.
@loez__ Your reply about quick checks gives the tagline a concrete use case. Worth testing as the subhead: "Free Mac stats in your menu bar, without opening Activity Monitor." It tells visitors where it lives, what it costs, and why they might want it.
SaaS founders: show your homepage to someone for 10 seconds, then hide it.
Ask: who is it for, what does it do, and what happens after the CTA?
If answers vary, rewrite the first screen and test again.
Free Lumora snapshot: https://t.co/dhIXeHeZLI
@araseb_ I built a free checker that shows what AI can understand, where your site is visible, and which gaps may be holding it back.
Check yours:
https://t.co/a7Xzj57uI6
Your website may look perfectly clear to you.
AI may see something else.
I built a free checker that shows what AI can understand, where your site is visible, and which gaps may be holding it back.
Check yours:
https://t.co/a7Xzj57uI6