@CaterinaCatK Thatโs even more interesting as a plot point. You make the client a married man with the moral dilemma of being a witness. He takes it upon himself to try to solve the crime without his wife knowing.
@ShiningArowsR17@CasandraBels1@CynicalPublius Whoa buddy, I never said it was required. But your lengthy reply is evidence that what I said was true. Here you are, openly discussing unlawful orders. Thanks for proving my point.
@ShiningArowsR17@CasandraBels1@CynicalPublius The fact that you see a reminder of their oath to the constitution and a reminder of not to play cards games as being on the same scale is very indicative of your lack of seriousness of deploying soldiers against American citizens. Firing on unarmed civilians is serious.
@ShiningArowsR17@CasandraBels1@CynicalPublius Anything that causes line troops to discuss amongst themselves the potential legality of orders is useful. They will probably be wondering if they should shoot unarmed civilians, if theyโre ordered to.
@ShiningArowsR17@CasandraBels1@CynicalPublius Proper training requires positive affirmation that the subject matter has been understood. So no, this is only a reminder, not a replacement for annual training.