INDOCTRINATION NATION: SICK and TIRED

Left & Right MUST UNITE to Make Americans Aware

[INDOCTRINATION NATION: SICK and TIRED @grampster1958]

@bitcoins1stlady THAT HIT YOU TOOK ON THE NOGGIN DID WORSE DAMAGE THAN YOU THINK!

[INDOCTRINATION NATION: SICK and TIRED @grampster1958]

@ShawnRobinHood7 IT WAS ANOTHER OF A LONG LINE OF ZIONIST MOSSAD/MIC FALSE FLAG OPERATIONS! WHO GAINED?!!

[INDOCTRINATION NATION: SICK and TIRED @grampster1958]

@TheDemSlayer ISRAEL IS THE TRUE ENEMY!

[INDOCTRINATION NATION: SICK and TIRED @grampster1958]

@EthanLevins2 IN DON'T COTTON TO COTTON! CALL YOUR SENATORS AND TELL THEM NO!

[INDOCTRINATION NATION: SICK and TIRED @grampster1958]

@RepThomasMassie AWESOME!

[Thomas Massie @RepThomasMassie]

Beginning today, your congressman can sign a discharge petition to force a vote on Epstein Files Transparency Act II.

EFTA II gives state AGs access to Epstein files required to prosecute perpetrators under state law, and makes it easier for survivors to sue to get their files.

[INDOCTRINATION NATION: SICK and TIRED @grampster1958]

I SUPPORTED TRUMP AND FEEL EXTREMELY BETRAYED! HE IS CLEARLY ANSWERING TO THE CEO!

[INDOCTRINATION NATION: SICK and TIRED @grampster1958]

EXACTLY! For everything there is a reason!

[INDOCTRINATION NATION: SICK and TIRED @grampster1958]

Masked Israeli settlers attack US news crew in West Bank — RT World News
https://t.co/NUzzUDmpkO

THIS IS WHAT TRUMP DEFENDS!

[INDOCTRINATION NATION: SICK and TIRED @grampster1958]

@TheDibsterX UNTIL NOW, I WAS NEVER A FAN! THIS BRINGS NEW MEANING TO WATERGATE!

[The Dibster @TheDibsterX]

Makes you wonder if what happened to Nixon had to do with the Jews.

Seems to me like we have had this Jewish infestation for a very long time!

[INDOCTRINATION NATION: SICK and TIRED @grampster1958]

@JackMedia7 SHARING IS CARING!

[AMERICANDREAM09 🇺🇸 Jack Media ~DREAM @JackMedia7]

No plane hit the Pentagon Sept 11, 2001! Cruise missile! Explosion and damage to building would have been immense! No bodies? No seats, fuselage! No landing gear? FAA states Flight 77 Never Existed! There was no plane! You've been lied to! 911 Truth? 👇 https://t.co/6QtlGDGAAz

[INDOCTRINATION NATION: SICK and TIRED @grampster1958]

@ky_statesman TIME WILL TELL!

[INDOCTRINATION NATION: SICK and TIRED @grampster1958]

MAKE VIRAL!

[INDOCTRINATION NATION: SICK and TIRED @grampster1958]

@skillz17q UNFORTUNATELY, YOUR BOUGHT AND PAID FOR CONGRESS'S HAVE, OVER THE YEARS UNLAWFULLY CREATED A 4TH BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT CALLED ADMINISTRATIVE. WITH IT THEIR EXTORTIVE STATUTORY SCHEME HAS REPLACED THE BILL OF RIGHTS AND IN THE PROCESS, CONVERTED YOUR RIGHTS TO MERE PRIVILEGES!

[All4Freedom🇺🇲🐸🍿 @skillz17q]

1. The Constitution: Supreme Governing Authority
The Constitution of the United States is the foundation of all legal authority. Article VI, Clause 2 declares that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties constitute the "supreme Law of the Land."

In Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137, 177–78 (1803), the Supreme Court established that legislative acts contravening the Constitution are void. Thus, the Constitution is not merely a statute within the hierarchy but the ultimate framework of authority, governing the enactment and application of all federal laws.

Key Rule:

The Constitution governs the validity and scope of all lower-level legal authorities.

2. Acts of Congress: The Enacted Statutory Law
Congress derives its authority from Article I of the Constitution and legislates through a bicameral process requiring presentment to the President (Article I, § 7). The laws Congress enacts—referred to as Acts—are binding federal statutory law.

Enforcement begins by asking the question:

What did Congress actually enact?
Thus, interpretations or judicial preferences cannot override the text explicitly enacted. In Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc., 586 U.S. 63, 68 (2019), the Supreme Court held that courts could not insert unwritten exceptions into statutory text, affirming that statutory interpretation respects legislative supremacy.

Key Rule:

Only provisions explicitly passed by Congress carry statutory force.
3. United States Statutes at Large: Chronological Evidence of Enactments

The United States Statutes at Large is the authoritative publication of federal session laws. Pursuant to 1 U.S.C. § 112, these statutes "shall be legal evidence" in both federal and state courts.

When determining what Congress enacted, the Statutes at Large provide the definitive source for tracing legislative language, original Acts, and amendments. For example, Pub. L. 95-598, codified in 92 Stat. 2549, represents the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 and its enacted language.

Key Rule:

The Statutes at Large are critical for confirming the original text Congress passed.

4. United States Code: Codification With Distinctions
The United States Code organizes and codifies federal statutes into subject-matter titles. However, the Code's evidentiary value depends on whether a title is classified as positive-law or non-positive-law:

Positive-law titles: Specifically enacted by Congress as self-contained federal statutes, treated as authoritative legal evidence.
Non-positive-law titles: Editorial compilations based on enacted laws, serving as prima facie (on their face) evidence of federal law. If the non-positive-law Code conflicts with the Statutes at Large, the enacted text in the Statutes prevails (1 U.S.C. § 204).
Practical Difference:

Positive-law titles hold statutory authority. Non-positive-law titles are rebuttable when discrepancies arise.

5. Legislative History: Context, Not Enacted Law
The Congressional Record and other historical documents provide evidence of legislative deliberations, debates, and intent but are not themselves the law.

The Supreme Court reiterated this in Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis, 584 U.S. 497, 523 (2018), where it stated:

“Legislative history is not the law.”
While legislative history may help clarify ambiguities, statutory interpretation ultimately depends on the enacted text, not the statements or motivations of individual legislators. Thus:

Acts of Congress (supported by the Statutes at Large) → Enacted Law

Congressional Record → Evidence of context; non-binding.
Key Rule:

Courts interpret legislative text, not intent, as controlling law.
6. Judicial Precedent: Interpretation and Application of Law
Federal courts determine how enacted statutes apply to specific cases. Supreme Court holdings on federal statutory or constitutional law are binding on lower courts under vertical stare decisis.

[INDOCTRINATION NATION: SICK and TIRED @grampster1958]

@AlyanaCart75229 I AM FROM MY MAMA!

[INDOCTRINATION NATION: SICK and TIRED @grampster1958]

@_josephine0_ NO! I'LL GET A WOODY!

[INDOCTRINATION NATION: SICK and TIRED @grampster1958]

@TeresaNacli IT IS THE ZIONISTS THAT ARE THE EVIL!