Jennifer Stisa Granick

I'm back. Personal account, opinions are mine and mine alone.

[Jennifer Stisa Granick @granick]

@d0tslash @907tothe703 @EFF Half price for shitposters.

[Jennifer Stisa Granick @granick]

@OrinKerr Thanks again for flagging the interesting cases, Orin. Can a pardon somehow vacate or depublish an existing opinion? It wasn't moot at the time it was litigated, so ....?

[Jennifer Stisa Granick @granick]

Supporters of the @NewCollegeofFL takeover cite the school's trajectory towards failure under the old model. And yet, despite millions more dollars, the school is getting worse. I'd rather fail while trying to do the right thing.

https://t.co/ynVPuF9r2C

[HannahL @HannahL]

Delighted to be in conversation with the amazing Ben Fountain this Saturday @OrindaBooks 3pm. If you’re in the east bay, join us. Free. Registration recommended. Link in bio.

[Jennifer Stisa Granick @granick]

I subscribed to @404mediaco today because their reporting is so excellent. If you are a privacy or security expert, it's a mistake to miss their coverage. You should take a look.

[Jennifer Stisa Granick @granick]

ACLU hiring NPAD Senior Policy Counsel (for reproductive freedom): https://t.co/cot0QsZ4pe #jobs

[Jennifer Stisa Granick @granick]

Good ole JD Vance, always good for a larf, bless his heart.

https://t.co/VAyIsNvPuy

[Jennifer Stisa Granick @granick]

Cat Missing in Yellowstone Returns Home to California After an 800-Mile Trek https://t.co/vZJsJQcSIS

[Jennifer Stisa Granick @granick]

@ChrisSliney @christopherrufo @SohrabAhmari The poor dear can't identify a chicken.

[Jennifer Stisa Granick @granick]

@ChrisSliney @christopherrufo @SohrabAhmari That didn’t stop a kind of conspiracy scavenger hunt by hordes of influencers and gawkers from unfolding across the city. https://t.co/hFmy88Duwf

[Jennifer Stisa Granick @granick]

The NACDL's 4AC is looking for a new Resource Counsel: https://t.co/Ml74GG9tZz (deadline Oct. 4).

#jobs

[Jennifer Stisa Granick @granick]

@daphnehk It should be a Nine Inch Nails song.

[Jennifer Stisa Granick @granick]

The best thing is, now you get to debate the sufficiency of evidence, rather than admit that your credulous old man believes whatever he sees on the Internet.

Such an obvious tactic, but people keep falling for it because we forget that they aren't interested in what happened.

[Jennifer Stisa Granick @granick]

First, make something up and then demand that other people prove that nothing like it ever happened. Then, if there is no evidence of your thing, assert that it must be a cover up. Do whatever you can to muddy the waters.

[Jennifer Stisa Granick @granick]

@ChrisSliney @christopherrufo @SohrabAhmari The reward incentivizes fake "proof". Making stuff up and then saying, hey Internet, I'll pay you if you can come forward with something isn't a recipe for truth finding. The responsibility is on the first guy who decides to say it.

[Jennifer Stisa Granick @granick]

@christopherrufo @SohrabAhmari Actually, lies would be better because then at least he would know what was going on. Should have said hallucinations.

[Jennifer Stisa Granick @granick]

@christopherrufo @SohrabAhmari Trump humiliated himself insisting on something patently silly & baseless because it was race-baiting, critical to his campaign. If he were able to concoct any factual basis, we would already know about it. Rufo isn't about journalism. It's $$ for a cover up of Trump's lies.

[Jennifer Stisa Granick @granick]

@christopherrufo @SohrabAhmari I'll offer $5k for evidence of Bigfoot. Teach the controversy the woke MSM won't cover.

[Ashley Gorski @ashgorski]

We're in the 9th Circuit today, arguing on behalf of Muslim Americans challenging unconstitutional religious questioning by CBP.

Border officers target Muslims returning home for irrelevant and intrusive questions like "Do you pray every day?" More here: https://t.co/9Z1gfv1aSh

[Jennifer Stisa Granick @granick]

"I like this baseless fantasy this man made up, why are you all assuming it's wrong? Let's pay someone to come up with something/anything so we switch from the embarrassing "hallucination" to "experts disagree over the (paid for post hoc) 'evidence '".

[Jennifer Stisa Granick @granick]

Wierdo offers to pay for video of someone eating a dog.

[Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ @christopherrufo]

I want to know the truth. Conservatives must be careful with the facts, and not let the narrative go beyond the evidence. Right now, the assumption is that this did not occur. But, if evidence emerges, it's in the public interest to bring it forward.