@BlackTM_ I did a first principles breakdown of corruption and realized that there's only 3 conditions that all need to true for corruption to happen, remove any one condition, a corrupt act can't happen. So why don't institutions just focus on eliminating these conditions?
Humanity already knows it's on the wrong path. The signals are everywhere. The question is not diagnostic. It's architectural: who benefits from the current trajectory, and are we willing to build the alternative before the trajectory becomes terminal?
@PempheroMphande There is a synergistic relationship within systems: the whole serves the parts, and the parts serve the whole. If the whole is misaligned with the system's desired emergence, then the parts fundamentally benefit from this misalignment. The parts will resist realignment.
There is a synergistic relationship within systems: the whole serves the parts, and the parts serve the whole. If the whole is misaligned with the system's desired emergence, then the parts fundamentally benefit from this misalignment. The parts will resist realignment.
Every system responds to its core architecture which incentivises the end emergent output. If a system is failing it's perceived design then it's the design that needs to be altered, not its outcomes.
@slicemagazine Even if the woman was in the wrong (allegedly), there's no justification in how this was handled. If she was your mother, would you turn a blind eye?