babahooey

[babahooey @grda]

@MarioNawfal Absolutely shameful. He needs to apologize.

[Robert W Malone, MD @RWMaloneMD]

The DoJ announces that the SPLC paid klan members a monthly salary to stay in the KKK and recruit new members. That a non-profit would do this is sick and sad. Just what were they thinking?

[Tyler O'Neil @Tyler2ONeil]

🚨READ IT

The Justice Department just secured a superseding indictment against the Southern Poverty Law Center, and it reveals some new bombshells

🧵1/20

https://t.co/uRCbnWaBzr

[Restore Halifax @RestoreHalifax]

Gad Saad explains suicidal empathy and its destructive effects on society.
https://t.co/Pp2DEi9yRh

[Ihtesham Ali @ihtesham2005]

A Norwegian neuroscientist spent 20 years proving that the act of writing by hand changes the human brain in ways typing physically cannot, and almost nobody outside her field has read the paper.

Her name is Audrey van der Meer.

She runs a brain research lab in Trondheim, and the paper that closed the argument was published in 2024 in a journal called Frontiers in Psychology. The finding is brutal enough that it should have changed every classroom on Earth.

The experiment was simple. She recruited 36 university students and put each one in a cap with 256 sensors pressed against their scalp to record brain activity. Words flashed on a screen one at a time.

Sometimes the students wrote the word by hand on a touchscreen using a digital pen, and sometimes they typed the same word on a keyboard. Every neural response was recorded for the full five seconds the word stayed on screen.

Then her team looked at the part of the data most researchers had ignored for years, which is how different parts of the brain were communicating with each other during the task.

When the students wrote by hand, the brain lit up everywhere at once.

The regions responsible for memory, sensory integration, and the encoding of new information were all firing together in a coordinated pattern that spread across the entire cortex. The whole network was awake and connected.

When the same students typed the same word, that pattern collapsed almost completely.

Most of the brain went quiet, and the connections between regions that had been alive seconds earlier were nowhere to be found on the EEG.

Same word, same brain, same person, and two completely different neurological events.

The reason turned out to be something nobody had really paid attention to before her work. Writing by hand is not one motion but a sequence of thousands of tiny micro-movements coordinated with your eyes in real time, where each letter is a different shape that requires the brain to solve a slightly different spatial problem.

Your fingers, wrist, vision, and the parts of your brain that track position in space are all working together to produce one letter, then the next, then the next.

Typing throws all of that away. Every key on a keyboard requires the exact same finger motion regardless of which letter you are pressing, which means the brain has almost nothing to integrate and almost no problem to solve.

Van der Meer said it plainly in her interviews.

Pressing the same key with the same finger over and over does not stimulate the brain in any meaningful way, and she pointed out something that should scare every parent who handed their kid an iPad.

Children who learn to read and write on tablets often cannot tell letters like b and d apart, because they have never physically felt with their bodies what it takes to actually produce those letters on a page.

A decade before her, two researchers at Princeton ran the same fight using a completely different method and ended up at the same answer. Pam Mueller and Daniel Oppenheimer tested 327 students across three experiments, where half took notes on laptops with the internet disabled and half took notes by hand, before testing everyone on what they actually understood from the lectures they had watched.

The handwriting group won by a wide margin on every question that required real understanding rather than surface recall.

The reason was hiding in the transcripts of what the two groups had actually written down.

The laptop students typed almost word for word, capturing more total content but processing almost none of it as they went, while the handwriting students physically could not write fast enough to transcribe a lecture in real time, which forced them to listen carefully, decide what actually mattered, and put it in their own words on the page.

That single act of choosing what to keep was the learning itself, and the keyboard had quietly skipped the choosing and skipped the learning along with it.

Two studies. Two countries. Same answer.

Handwriting makes the brain work. Typing lets it coast.

Every note you have ever typed instead of written went into your brain through a thinner pipe. Every meeting, every book highlight, every idea you captured on your phone instead of on paper was processed at half depth.

You did not forget those things because your memory is bad. You forgot them because typing never woke the part of the brain that would have made them stick.

The fix is the thing your grandmother already knew.

Pick up a pen. Write the thing down. The slower road is the faster one.

[illuminatibot @iluminatibot]

The US ranks 3rd in gun violence out of 193 nations. Remove the top 5 Democrat-run, liberal cities with strict gun control, and it drops to 189th. This shows gun control cause increase violence

[Tristin Hopper @TristinHopper]

To any future historians reading this, this era will make a lot more sense if you remember that every name is the opposite of what it really is. The antifascists are fascists, the antiracists are racists, the fact-checkers are propagandists, etc. Hopefully this has been fixed by your time.

[Vitaliy Katsenelson @vitaliyk]

I came to America to escape people who talk like this.

“Having a different relationship to property” is communist code for ownership being conditional and political. It is the same idea that destroyed entire societies, now rebranded with softer language and moral smugness.

Property rights are not optional. They are the operating system of a free society. Every serious economist in history agrees on one point: incentives matter.

Ayn Rand said it perfectly: “You can ignore reality, but you cannot ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.”

Housing is expensive because activists and politicians make building illegal, slow, and politically toxic. Fixing supply is hard. Attacking ownership is easy. That is why failed thinkers always choose the latter.

I have more respect for flat earthers than communists. Flat earthers are harmless, and everyone agrees they are idiots. Communism keeps getting recycled as virtue despite its body count and total record of failure. Communists, democratic socialists, or whatever they like to call themselves nowadays are society’s most dangerous idiots, especially when they are elected into positions of power.

I lived under collective property. It meant decay, shortages, corruption, and people pretending to work while the system pretended to function.

I did not come to America to hear these ideas again, dressed up as justice.

I came here because this country understood something rare: freedom requires ownership.

I have seen how this ends.

It never ends well.

[JD Vance @JDVance]

This is important--money is fungible--and it's why the Democrat and media lie that health care is not going to illegals is so preposterous. Consider, for instance, two state Medicaid programs--Ohio and New York. New York gives Medicaid to illegals and Ohio doesn't.

When the government gives billions of dollars to New York for Medicaid, that frees up state money in New York that can then be spent on illegals.

It's like if you give a mobster $100 but he PROMISES you he won't spend the money to buy a gun and commit a crime. Well, he takes the $100 you gave him and buys food, and then takes the money he would have spent on food and uses that money to buy the gun instead. This is what "money is fungible" means.

Additionally, because medical services are limited in supply, when an illegal accesses health. care, it drives up the cost for everyone. So New Yorkers are paying a higher price for medical services, and the federal government is subsidizing those higher prices.

So everyone in the media, from George Stephanopoulos to Jake Tapper, repeating these Democrat talking points, is engaged in the Democrat propaganda war.

Democrats shut down the government to give health care money to illegal aliens. It's really that simple.

[Wade Miller @WadeMiller]

Here is how it works… federal dollars go to a Democrat state for healthcare, and since money is fungible, they then move state dollars over to fund illegals, which is made possible by federal dollars filling the gap where state dollars should be going.

So functionally federal dollars make funding healthcare for illegals possible.

On top of that, a lot of this money funds the infrastructure that is then used to provide healthcare benefits to illegals.

On top of that, any illegals committing fraud that has gone undetected could qualify for coverage, and how hard are liberal states looking at that problem? Not much at all.

[Polymarket @Polymarket]

BREAKING: YouTube admits it censored Americans at the request of the Biden administration.

[Wall Street Apes @WallStreetApes]

The Smith-Mundt Act is trending on X, don’t let this momentum die

We must Restore the Smith Mundt Act and call it The Charlie Kirk Act to end legalized mainstream media propaganda

Mike Benz talks with Joe Rogan about what Barack Obama really did by repealing the Smith–Mundt Act
‌
🚨 It’s SO MUCH BIGGER than just allowing use of propaganda on Americans, it allowed for:
‌
- Infiltrate and co-opt the universities
- The unions
- The media
- The politicians
- The judges
‌
It allowed
‌
- Foreign policy establishment can fund groups that effectively work with prosecutors domestically or that work at media, dual sort of dual use
- To give them foreign grants to do media propaganda abroad but they operate here, or social media censorship to coerce foreign countries to pass foreign censorship laws that explicitly and are intended to attack US social media companies and in US peer-to-peer speech
‌
“1948, Congress recognized the Frankensteinian monster they were creating by authorizing a covert permanent department of dirty Tricks. And this is their phrase, not mine, to do this cloak and dagger to infiltrate and co-opt the universities, the unions, the media, the politicians, the judges, the whole swarm army. You know what I have been calling for a long time, the USAID Truman Show”
‌
“That are effectively a movie set being constructed by the US State Department and its sister influence orgs — The CIA”
‌
“So the Smith–Mundt Act was always designed to say, listen, you can do this dirty stuff abroad, but it can't come home. We have that protection, which lasted for 70 years and only, we only lost it a decade ago.” By BARACK OBAMA
‌
ALL THESE THINGS and more were to be allowed to be used OVERSEAS ONLY, the Smith–Mundt Act was created to ensure that
‌
But then Barack Obama got installed, he repealed the Smith–Mundt Act and now ALL THESE TOOLS were used against the American people and we paid for it all
‌
Every person in America needs to watch every second of this video. There would not be a single Democrat voter left. Obama was installed to start the takedown of America and use our own agencies against us
‌
You could also argue THIS is why we have so many activist judges

[Gunther Eagleman™ @GuntherEagleman]

BREAKING: RFK Jr. is on Fox this morning and he's CALLING OUT the Democrats who revealed their true colors during the Senate Hearing!

"I’ve come to realize that those hearings are performative, they’re theater and they’re not the crowned debate or open conversation that democracy would give us at its ideal and all of those senators are taking hundreds of thousands of dollars including in some cases millions of dollars from the pharmaceutical industry so they don’t want to hear the answers to the questions that they ask me."

BOOM!

[babahooey @grda]

@saras76 @nicksortor Yes! Mute or block all of them as well.

[Nick Sortor @nicksortor]

@Rightanglenews Apparently these people didn’t learn when I called out the Big Soda influencers earlier this year.

I don’t play nice with people who take money to undermine my country and our President.

[babahooey @grda]

@Rightanglenews This is disgusting. Just found out that I can’t trust these people and every post they make. Can someone compile a list of these paid pushers? I muted the accounts Nick mentioned including the ones here. This is eye opening.

https://t.co/YSTHWiKFzR

[Nick Sortor @nicksortor]

These influencers were given a couple templates to use by Influenceable, with one of those templates SPECIFICALLY telling them to mention Trump’s Diet Coke habit

This was done to invoke an EMOTIONAL response from loyal Trump supporters, making them feel as if banning soda from SNAP would be anti-Trump.

This is an incredibly dirty tactic, meant to manipulate loyal followers.

[babahooey @grda]

@DefiantLs @nicksortor Disgusting and https://t.co/AYQMKmP3No lost. Will be tuning you and other accounts that does this without disclosing.

[Nick Sortor @nicksortor]

🚨 BEWARE: Large accounts are being paid to attack Trump’s tariffs on India to their “MAGA audience”

Posts with the EXACT SAME talking points went out at practically the same time.

And of course, no disclosure.

Many of these accounts are foreigners. Don’t fall for this crap.

[Right Angle News Network @Rightanglenews]

BREAKING - Independent journalist Nick Sortor has uncovered a deep network of X influencers being paid to promote pro-Indian messaging.

[babahooey @grda]

Trust lost.

Shouldn’t these “influencers” supposed to be disclosing that they were paid to post?

If not, there needs to be a law for transparency ASAP.

[Nick Sortor @nicksortor]

🚨🧵 EXPOSED: “INFLUENCEABLE” — The company cutting Big Checks to “influencers” on behalf of Big Soda

Over the past 48 hours, several large supposedly MAGA-aligned “influencers” posted almost identical talking points fed to them, convincing you MAHA was out of line for not wanting soda purchases with food stamps (SNAP)

Some even slimely invoked PRESIDENT TRUMP as an emotional manipulation tactic, referring to his Diet Coke button.

Not a SINGLE ONE of them disclosed they were paid for these posts, which led readers to believe a general SODA BAN was in the works.