@Ana_Bastet911@ApatheticAddict@CoreyWriting "Not about this case"? He told his victim that reporting him would harm Palestine and filed warrants weeks after the allegations. The misconduct and the warrants are not separate stories. The warrants were his leverage and shield. You can't get more "about this case" than that.
@Ana_Bastet911@ApatheticAddict@CoreyWriting So evidence from a cop guilty of serious misconduct is fine as long as a judge signed the warrant? No civilized court works that way. Everything he touched gets reviewed unless the institution’s prejudged conclusion matters more than its process. Which one is the ICC? 😂
@Ana_Bastet911@ApatheticAddict@CoreyWriting The ICC’s own governing body found he committed “serious misconduct,” suspended him, and scheduled a removal vote for next week. When the court itself concludes its prosecutor is compromised, “but judges signed off” on his ex parte submissions isn’t the flex you think it is.
@Ana_Bastet911@ApatheticAddict@CoreyWriting The ICJ is corrupt but it it’s you trying to have it both ways. I only revealed the consequence of your premise.
The ridiculous ICC warrants coming from a sex offender prosecutor that threatened his victim that coming forward would “hurt Palestine” - that’s merits a rofl 😂
@Ana_Bastet911@ApatheticAddict@CoreyWriting Not that the corrupt ICJ means much (especially the ludicrous 2004 "occupation" ruling), but if you insist, no court has ruled about any disproportionality or failure to protect according to real IHL, not X imagined one. Hamas OTOH broadcasts their war crimes live. Law book lol
@trishaposner@EmmaVigeland I wonder what her conversation partner has to say on the Nazi treatment of black people. History shows he shouldn't be very excited about "secret Nazis".
@ApatheticAddict@CoreyWriting Yes, and, for an encore, further claiming what I said.
Whatever moral principle you feel is reasonable, this “right of the occupied” does not exist anywhere in international law. Also any party involved in a “liberation struggle” must still obey IHL and not rape, behead, etc…
@havivrettiggur Let's not forget that per the Sinwar documents, the operation's objective was committing and broadcasting atrocities, hostage taking, and burning of villages.
For Hamas' inverted plan, Israeli military casualties were the collateral damage, not the target.
@shaunmmaguire@RoKhanna So if, on a scale of 1 to 10 we assign 10/7 a 10, and Ro recommends we go to 6 or 7 or 8…
What are we talking about here? How many rapes and beheadings are in a level 7 massacre?
Ro and Scahill are cynical opportunists and not different in any meaningful way.
@DrEricDing Nothing to do with AI, this is just cheating on a take-home test. Some people did this before AI and even before the internet. It was just as easy to ask a friend.
This says more about the moral leanings of this class (and, possibly, Brown admissions) than anything about AI.
@ConceptualJames Good distinction, but glosses over the fact that for them, "Palestine" is the lynchpin of the omni-cause, the load bearing instrument for the entire "Capitalist Empire", and Israel the source of all of the world's evils.
It's a classic Soviet/Antisemitic chocolate vanilla swirl.
@mkhammer Her point has nothing to do with schools and budgets.
It’s a credentialed winding way to get to “the war machine” and “genocide”. Religiously like an “amen” at the end of a sentence.
That’s the point of the answer for her. She never meant to talk about schools and doesn’t care.
@havivrettiggur@JosephineS40946 בבירור בן-גביר הוא פיגוע עצמי תודעתי קולוסאלי.
אבל בגרמניה 20-30% פשיסטים. בישראל בערך 10%. קנצלר גרמניה, אם רק היה רוצה, היה מסוגל להבין איך אפשר לקיים דמוקרטיה ליברלית, גם עם שוליים צעקנים. הוא בוחר לא להבין, וזה בגלל הדמוגרפיה בברלין יותר מאשר בגלל בן-גביר.
@AndrewKolvet Strawman as will never come to this. But yes, even this if that's what it takes to open the strait. Otherwise, what's stopping hostage taking the Panama Canal, Gibraltar, Suez... How about if they demand Vermont to open them? I've asked such strawmen and you don't have answers...
@ConceptualJames Zionists don’t believe Iran will uphold the deal for one second.
They are worried that just like with UNSC 1701 promised disarmament of Hezbollah in South Lebanon, pressure on Iran will stop and benefits of the “deal” paid out anyway. This has happened many times before.
@realLainey@literaryeric 80-90% of Palestinian society, including those opposed to Hamas, support “armed resistance” (I.e. 10/7) from the river to the sea.Same support across 500m Arabs and slightly lower among 2B Muslims.
#2 doesn’t help.