Meanwhile on Bluesky they are bragging about throwing garbage at @bourne_beth2345 for holding a sign that said, “No boys in girls sports.”
A dude who claimed to be a psychologist witnesses the event and then decides to lecture Beth on the difference between battery & assault.
Why are you friends with someone who sees womanhood as a costume and a commodity? The man is a creep and a pervert who violates women’s spaces and privacy. I don’t think you’re as much of a sex realist as you pretend. No exceptions. No compromises. No quarter asked or given. Any man who transgresses in our spaces, any man who thinks that womanhood is a feeling he can own, is the enemy.
7. Here’s another anonymous pervert. This one gets his rocks off by dressing like a little girl, pigtails and all.
Remember, these men dress themselves up like their own preferred victims. This is autopedophilia with an AGP twist, and I’d bet my pension that his hard drive is full of CSAM.
6. Not sure who this bloke is (god i love british slang) but once again we see a man using a filtered image as “proof” that he deserves to be in women’s spaces.
Let me be clear. I don’t care if a man looks like this incel loser, or if he looks like Miss America. Men do not belong in women’s spaces, and their appearance is immaterial to this fact.
You don’t get to violate women’s rights, even if you can present a convincing illusion of womanhood. You’re still a man, so GTFO, creep.
5. And of course we can’t forget Fred Wallace. I’ll let @FindingDore sum him up, because she did it brilliantly. Apologies for the damage to y’all’s eyes.
3. I’m not sure who this charmer is, but imagine planning a date with her, only to have him show up. This is exactly why first dates should always take place in public.
2. “Orchia” Minn. His head tilt game isn’t as strong, but he gets bonus points for naming himself after the Greek word for “testicle,” although “Orca” would have been more appropriate.
Profile Pics vs Reality: A Thread
Let’s see the stubbled and entitled faces/Of the men demanding entry into women’s spaces…
And yes, I’m taking submissions. These fake photos are part of the lie we’re being sold.
1. “Steph” Richards. Just look at that head tilt, ladies!
So… we’re expected to believe that in California, out of three candidates, the third place candidate, who conceded her campaign because she was mathematically eliminated from the run-off, suddenly received tens of thousands of votes from mail-in votes which all came in *after* Election Day, while the other two candidates received no late mail-in votes, and the second place candidate (who was surging as a Republican candidate in the bluest state in the country) is now in third place and mathematically eliminated from the run-off.
… and we’re supposed to trust that this is an honest and true election.
If you’re not angry about this, you need to be.
@SexMattersOrg Thanks for this. For the vast majority of women, toilets & changing rooms are things we use all the time and where we’re most likely to be impacted by trans-identifying men breaking the law. They are NOT a trivial matter for us, and no more negotiable than prisons or refuges etc.
NEW: Poll shows that the vast majority of people prefer straightforward single-sex facilities in workplaces and public spaces.
This varies little by age or voting pattern. Politicians who prevaricate over the Supreme Court judgment are out of step with the public.
Sex Matters commissioned an independent, nationally representative poll. We asked:
“For each of the following, do you prefer them to be single sex or mixed sex?”
@OkayBiology I'm fairly sure Dave, my next door neighbour, wouldn't rape me in the changing rooms at the swimming pool either but he's still not fucking allowed in there.
Why are men so determined to let other men into spaces where little girls are peeing or undressed? 👀
“Isn't it ironic that puberty is considered so agonizing for the "trans" mind that they're told it must be chemically ended, yet a girl in school who's too uncomfortable managing her period in a bathroom because boys could be in there is told to suck it up. “
Female-only spaces aren't just about preventing harm; they're about personal consent and boundaries. When we eliminate sex-separated spaces, we effectively strip women and girls of the ability to consent to who views or shares their most vulnerable, private moments.
These spaces were originally designed, in part, to allow women to enter public life, the workplace, and education comfortably and equitably. Removing those spaces ironically pushes women out of the public square.
Isn't it ironic that puberty is considered so agonizing for the "trans" mind that they're told it must be chemically ended, yet a girl in school who's too uncomfortable managing her period in a bathroom because boys could be in there is told to suck it up.
Girls may even avoid the restroom altogether because of boys in the space, causing genuine physical discomfort and harm, but her well being is discarded in order to ensure boys never have to be uncomfortable by admitting to and abiding by the constraints of their sex.
Misogyny 101
@OkayBiology Why are all these men so hell bent on invading, or allowing other men to invade our spaces? And why the hell are they trying to stop us speaking?
The only men who are a danger to women in female toilets & changing rooms are the men demanding access to them. 🚺
And that includes the men who campaign for other men to be allowed access to female only spaces.
There should be a special register for men who make these demands🚩
The only men who are a danger to women in female toilets & changing rooms are the men demanding access to them. 🚺
And that includes the men who campaign for other men to be allowed access to female only spaces.
There should be a special register for men who make these demands🚩