Pride is a celebration and a protest. Greens will always stand in solidarity with the LGBTQ+ community as we fight for:
🏳️🌈A ban on conversion therapy
🏳️🌈End the Gender Recognition Reform block
🏳️🌈Improve trans healthcare provision
🏳️🌈Create a kinder, fairer country for all
United Kingdom (Scottish parliament election): the Scottish Green Party (SGP-G/EFA) achieved a record high result of 15 seats, almost double the party's previous seat tally.
The party also won its first two constituency seats, unseating two SNP-G/EFA government ministers.
➤ https://t.co/gtoREMhzES
@Daodaoldn @b1d3nat0r @ElectionMapsUK Absolutely. I’d prefer for more MSPs per region than Wales has, as it does raise the effective vote share needed for a seat from ~5% to ~15%.
An open list system would also be great, to allow folks to choose specific candidates from a list, rather than the party-assigned order.
@Daodaoldn @b1d3nat0r @ElectionMapsUK That’s less ‘strategy’ and more tactical pressures from a system which still relies on FPTP. Neither party encourages it.
I wouldn’t equate tactical voting to “gaming the system”. We should have a fully PR system where voters feel able to vote for the party they best align with.
@AFrazzledScot@scottishgreens Annoyingly the cost argument was convincing for many. I hoped we could at least stand on all of Glasgow-Edinburgh seats as a minimum, where we were almost certainly gonna retain all deposits. Hopefully folks like us pushing to stand in more constituencies win out next time.
@Daodaoldn @b1d3nat0r @ElectionMapsUK An SNP majority comes at the detriment of Green MSPs elected, because of the overhang created by the SNP winning more constituencies than the system can correct for via the list seats
@Daodaoldn @b1d3nat0r @ElectionMapsUK It’s literally not in the interest of Greens or the wider Indy movement for the SNP to have a majority, why would we do that?
@Daodaoldn @b1d3nat0r @ElectionMapsUK Literally had nothing to do with the SNP. It was democratically decided by local members, mainly under grounds of cost for deposits. I didn’t agree with the argument, but that’s what local members voted for.
@JamesKelly But this is where I argue that the SNP’s messaging makes no sense. If Labour are what they’re worried about, why lie and say it’s between the SNP and the Tories? Isn’t that even more disingenuous?
@JamesKelly There’s large parts of the constituency Greens didn’t stand in.
In addition, the Green vote share in 2021 was depressed by SNP-Tory tactical voting, hence why our 2016 share was higher.
With no risk of the Tories getting in, Greens have no reason to vote tactically anymore.
@NiallChristie1 Solidarity Niall. Irrespective of party affiliation, I have great respect for your dedication and commitment to the values you believe in.
Wish you all the best for what comes next.
@InvernessTop My broader worry for Indy is that if the SNP scrapes a majority on 30% of the vote, I’m not sure that would shift the needle at Westminster, or carry salience with the public. The SNP’s high 2011 vote share carried salience.
This whole move further risks the SNP’s credibility.
��️ Progressive and younger voters are worried about the rise of Nigel Farage and Reform UK.
🟡 I defeated the Tories in Edinburgh Central in 2021.
🗳️ To lock them and the far right out, vote SNP and Angus Robertson on May 7th.
@InvernessTop I understand your hesitation. My hope is that we get more regular polling in the lead up to the election, and things are clearer on that front. I suspect Labour would need a significant boost in their polling to win in Central. Let’s see what happens in May!
@InvernessTop Areas with strong Green list vote will have strong const. vote.
This notional list share is higher than the in the old Glasgow Kelvin, where Greens got within 15% of winning from an SNP which is now down 13% in the polling average.
Edinburgh is also the SNP’s weakest region.
@InvernessTop Because the new boundaries include strong Green areas that didn’t have a 2021 constituency candidate, the list comparison is a neater example to make the point. But more granular 2022 locals data, and list shares between constituencies all back up the BBS projection.
@InvernessTop The key reason for the uptick are significant boundary changes which push up the Green baseline.
Comparing list shares in the old vs new boundaries makes this point well. Constituency share would start a little lower due to FPTP pressures, but the pattern would still hold.
@ramacphee5 It’s mostly due to significant boundary changes that took out loads of more Tory and LD areas, and replaced them with strongly Green areas.
Even the 2021 result is somewhat deceiving, as the Green vote share dropped from 13.6% in 2016 due to anti-Tory tactical voting.