Sartaf Vordapal 🇬🇧

Proud Yorkshire Brit. Voted Labour (a few times) Tory, albeit for personal selfish reasons. Now I realise it's bigger than me. Reform all the way.

[Sartaf Vordapal 🇬🇧 @gt550smoke]

@grok @ScottWarner18 What about Manny Pacquiao's world titles over 8 different weights?

[Sartaf Vordapal 🇬🇧 @gt550smoke]

@BaitsDandydons @Bbmorg Don't forget, also conveniently disposing of the device that would have without doubt backed up her accusations.

[Sartaf Vordapal 🇬🇧 @gt550smoke]

@Alchemyst789 @Bbmorg Maybe. But it takes some mental gymnastics to get from criticising dodgy evidence to condoning rape.

[Sartaf Vordapal 🇬🇧 @gt550smoke]

@JaydenUddoman @NicknameisBush @JamesD74431175 Would you marry her?

[Sartaf Vordapal 🇬🇧 @gt550smoke]

@JaydenUddoman @NicknameisBush @JamesD74431175 Deflect by calling someone names when you don't want to answer as question. Are you a child? Are you even capable of having an adult conversation?

[Sartaf Vordapal 🇬🇧 @gt550smoke]

@CuriousandFemme @JGourd7 @SammiePressdee What are you on about? Of course they count.
And no, neither could keep it in their pants. Neither could wait to get down to it. Loved ones at home or not.

[Sartaf Vordapal 🇬🇧 @gt550smoke]

@CuriousandFemme @JGourd7 @SammiePressdee Yes in summing up. It's probably somewhere on camera too. But not allowed into court during trial. Tbh I wouldn't trust either of them. Neither could keep it in their pants. Maybe there is a message there.

[Sartaf Vordapal 🇬🇧 @gt550smoke]

@CuriousandFemme @JGourd7 @SammiePressdee not protecting anyone. Can't stand him.. I'm questioning the trial process, and the way it seems people want to question the character of a witness they don't like, but not the character of one they do.
RBs previous should be disregarded it's how trials work. Where did he lie?

[Sartaf Vordapal 🇬🇧 @gt550smoke]

@CuriousandFemme @JGourd7 @SammiePressdee Brand's previous is not relevant. That's how trials work.
Again, wouldn't you question the reliability of your accuser if you were on trial or should trials be conducted differently depending on whether you like someone or not? Or whether it's you or someone you hate?

[Sartaf Vordapal 🇬🇧 @gt550smoke]

@CuriousandFemme @fieryseahorse @JGourd7 @SammiePressdee Her character has every bearing on her being a reliable witness in a trial.
Her private life is anonymous apart from the events surrounding the affair, which is very relevant.
Wouldn't you question the honesty of the only witness if you were on trial?

[Sartaf Vordapal 🇬🇧 @gt550smoke]

@grok @GilesKendrick @vernesm @ABridgen @1_True_Voice Trauma and distress can happen in consensual sex, due to guilt and breakdown of her relationship?
Should the nurse have told police?
Would you have had reasonable doubt here? Or would you convict?

[Sartaf Vordapal 🇬🇧 @gt550smoke]

@grok @GilesKendrick @vernesm @ABridgen @1_True_Voice But she was the only witness to her consenting. So what she told others was her account. Would you trust her not to lie to them too. With certainty?

[Sartaf Vordapal 🇬🇧 @gt550smoke]

@grok @GilesKendrick @vernesm @ABridgen @1_True_Voice Can someone who disposes of supposedly vital evidence (phone) lies and cheats on her BF multiple times, be honest enough to be the only witness, that puts a man behind bars?

[Sartaf Vordapal 🇬🇧 @gt550smoke]

@JaydenUddoman @NicknameisBush @JamesD74431175 Many might going on what was allowed about his previous in court. Which was absolutely nothing. It should be irrelevant. Her behaviour is part of the trial and very relevant. I doubt many men would marry her, but somehow she's deemed trustworthy here?

[Sartaf Vordapal 🇬🇧 @gt550smoke]

@davesharp59 @ABridgen The debate isnt whether RB is guilty its about the credibility of the victim as a honest witness. Disposed of phone that had supposedly incriminating evidence, lied to her BF to cheat multiple times, and her possible previous has been hidden.
Is she being honest beyond doubt?

[Sartaf Vordapal 🇬🇧 @gt550smoke]

@NicknameisBush @JaydenUddoman @JamesD74431175 You're still avoiding the question and we all know why. And you already know that the history of the defendants are irrelevant because it's disregarded in trials. So.... Back to you to answer.
Is she the marrying kind, and if not, why not?

[Sartaf Vordapal 🇬🇧 @gt550smoke]

@EnglishKen65 @5DPigeon @samuel_leeds @rustyrockets You do know rough sex can be consensual?

[Sartaf Vordapal 🇬🇧 @gt550smoke]

@EnglishKen65 @samuel_leeds @5DPigeon @rustyrockets His previous shouldn't have been on trial. It should have been as relevant as his accusers past, which was anonymous.

[Sartaf Vordapal 🇬🇧 @gt550smoke]

@NicknameisBush @JaydenUddoman @JamesD74431175 Love how you avoid the question.
It's relevant to how you view the character of one of only two witnesses to the event, and you are afraid to answer it.

[Sartaf Vordapal 🇬🇧 @gt550smoke]

@CuriousandFemme @JGourd7 @SammiePressdee A woman's character and honesty has everything to do with whether she can be truthful. They are both slime balls, and yes RB should be behind bars, but can she be relied upon to be honest about events that puts a bloke there for 10 years? Not beyond any doubt, no.