Under British Prime Minister Keir Starmers leadership, those with an opinion are BANNED from entering the country.
Those who wish you harm, or have committed extreme crimes are WELCOME.
This is modern Britain.
🚨Local man EXPLODES at a council meeting in Crowborough regarding illegal migrants being housed in his community 🇬🇧
“600 MEN in a community of 20,000 and you think you can control them? NO YOU CAN’T!”
All across the UK the sentiment is the same ⚠️
🚨 BREAKING: Kemi Badenoch asks Keir Starmer why he and Rachel Reeves have not RESIGNED over their Budget LIES 🇬🇧
EVERYONE KNOWS THEY SHOULD RESIGN, THE WHOLE OF LABOUR NEEDS TO GO 🚫
#PMQs
Something shifted today. The Budget row stopped being a story about dishonesty and became something darker: a government moving to remove the one man who could expose it. Rachel Reeves hasn't simply misrepresented the public finances. She hasn't simply engineered a false fiscal crisis. She is now clinging to office because the one man who could contradict her – the chairman of the OBR – has been shoved aside hours before he was due to give evidence. That is not politics. That is the state reaching for the dimmer switch to keep the truth out of sight.
Richard Hughes's resignation was dressed up as noble self-sacrifice, but the timing gives the game away. He falls on the morning Reeves faces her fiercest scrutiny. He disappears from the witness table where he was meant to confirm, under oath and in public, that the Chancellor had the upgraded forecasts before she warned the country of a black hole that did not exist. And he falls after days of pressure from ministers who suddenly lost their patience with the one body they had spent months claiming proved their credibility. A watchdog that tells the truth is useful to them. A watchdog that contradicts the script is disposable.
This is the true scandal. Not the lie, but the purge. A government that cooks its own numbers is untrustworthy. A government that removes the referee to protect a minister is dangerous. Reeves has not merely broken faith with the public – she has broken the independence of Britain's fiscal institutions. The OBR was created to keep politicians honest. Today it has been reminded, in brutal terms, that honesty carries a price.
Starmer cannot wash his hands of this. His fingerprints are all over the weapon. He attacked the OBR for its timing. His ministers briefed against Hughes. His MPs questioned his position. Reeves withdrew her confidence just as the narrative turned against her. And then, as the walls closed in, the man at the centre of the row quietly exited the stage. Starmer held a press conference insisting there was "no misleading," a line delivered with the weary certainty of a man who hopes repetition can replace truth. It cannot. The public is not blind. They can see the choreography.
A Prime Minister who stays silent while his Chancellor misleads the country is weak. A Prime Minister who allows the watchdog to be trampled to spare his Chancellor is complicit. This government now faces a crisis of legitimacy of its own making. It asked the country to trust it. Then it undermined the very institution designed to earn that trust. This is not the behaviour of grown-ups. It is the behaviour of a government that fears scrutiny because it knows scrutiny will expose the lie.
We should be clear about what happened today. The head of the OBR resigned in the middle of the biggest fiscal scandal in years. He resigned on the eve of giving testimony that could have ended Reeves's career. And he resigned under a cloud of ministerial pressure, pointed criticism, and barely disguised frustration from Number 10. This government has not only misled the public – it has interfered with the mechanisms designed to correct that misconduct.
A country can survive a dishonest Budget. It cannot survive a government that silences the people who catch it.
And that is where Britain now stands. If the ethics system fails to act, if Parliament shrugs, if the OBR is cowed into submission, then the lie becomes law and the truth becomes optional. Reeves may cling on. Starmer may brazen it out. But a government that protects itself by toppling the watchdog is not a government with a future. It is a government already rotting from the inside.
"Richard Hughes's resignation was dressed up as noble self-sacrifice, but the timing gives the game away. He falls on the morning Reeves faces her fiercest scrutiny."
“I think Elon Musk is an idiot”
“Why because he invented SpaceX & Tesla?”
“People are waking up - they’ve been lied to the entire time”
“You’re terrified because he’s allowed speech you can’t control”
Incredible exchange - you can literally watch the Liberal Left malfunction in real time as they realise they’ve lost control of the narrative.
Council tax bills set to rise at fastest rate in 20 years.
The average home's council tax bill will increase by £359 by 2029
So what happened to “Labour would freeze your council tax”?
Or “Not a penny more on your council tax…No ifs, no buts”?
Non-stop lies.
🚨 "VICE PRESIDENT J.D. VANCE CALLS OUT EUROPE—‘WE DON’T SHARE VALUES WITH TYRANNY!’" 🚨
🔴 J.D. Vance just dropped a truth bomb. While American taxpayers fund Europe’s defense, countries like Germany are jailing citizens for speech crimes, and Romania is canceling elections it doesn’t like.
🔴 This is NOT democracy. If a nation silences its people, crushes dissent, and rejects basic freedoms, can they really call themselves allies?
🔥 WHY IS AMERICA SUBSIDIZING AUTHORITARIANISM? 🔥
📢 WHAT THIS MEANS:
⚠️ Europe depends on American defense—but refuses to defend free speech.
⚠️ If a government criminalizes speech, it’s not a democracy—it’s a dictatorship.
⚠️ True allies respect liberty—those who don’t are no different from the regimes we oppose.
💥 The world is waking up—so when will the American taxpayer stop paying for tyranny? 💥
🚨 Should America continue defending countries that jail their own citizens for speaking the truth? 🚨
🚨 BREAKING: The TRUTH is surfacing, and it’s chilling. 🚨
Keir Starmer defended the father of the Southport killer—a Rwandan warlord linked to genocide. Under Tony Blair, he was brought to the UK alongside 9 other alleged killers under a “special provision.” Starmer fought to stop his extradition for GENOCIDE.
Where are the other 9? What was this secret deal? Why the silence?
The British people deserve answers, and this cover-up cannot stand. The safety of our citizens must come before globalist schemes.
It’s time for accountability. No more lies. No more betrayal. 🛑
🇷🇺🇺🇸 “In case of a nuclear war 99% of people in the Untied States, Europe, China and Russia would die.
5 billion would subsequently starve”
You, who reads this tweet, would be dead!
-> Folks Ukraine is not worth that!