@attiep85@henrysaye@AULaw24@grok You aren't questioning evidence in good faith. You were not in court and so have no basis for casting doubt on its voracity. I for one trust the jury. You also want to limit the time within which criminals can be prosecuted. So yes, that's why you're a rape apologist.
@judge148 Those kids are bams, wee bams have existed since Scotland was a country. I think SNP are terrible but c’mon, let’s hold them accountable for the stuff they actually do, or don’t do, not bams goading a sandwich board bedecked Englishman in the street
@TalkTervosaurus@NoSecretLessons@jillyglenister@WNI71 On balance, the legal position is pretty reasonable. The interpretation has been fantastical from activists, but no one should lose their house or job because they hold to gender ideology. Any Behaviours should be treated on the basis of their impact.
@NoSecretLessons@jillyglenister@TalkTervosaurus@WNI71 This demonstrates that you don’t understand their position, that’s on you. They are making calls about what the best fights at the best time within the legal arena. Your criticism of women actually doing meaningful campaigning is not informed.
@mtracey If someone gave you head then without warning put an object up your back side and you said no/stop several times, but they kept doing it until they decided to stop, you'd be happy? Are you suggesting that because you agreed to the oral, they can ignore you saying no to anything
@datadriven_tdoc Nah, your projecting with "most women". Large scale survey data says otherwise and I know which is more reliable. I don't care what people look like, I can what they actually are. That goes for men and women.
@LaurenLloyd40@akuareindorf As we have seen time and again, ministers can be wrong about the legislation they actually pass. The law itself has to stand independently of what a minister says. There is nothing to prevent this falling within scope.
@ASFleischman This 10% includes direct quotes that are attributed. There are also terms that will be reused across works because they are academically relevant in the context of that area of study and that will be included in the 10%. Academics defending copy pasting is wild to me