@nomagesallowe@al_sheene@SkyNews No fucking shit Sherlock. The point is it's a good thing for the UK to actually have working deterrent. It doesn't mean we're going to nuke people you dumbass.
@al_sheene@SkyNews It's not fearmongering lmfao. It's notable because before the UK only had 1 to 2 out at sea previously. It's been 5 years since there were 3 out at sea at the same time.
@Mikey1284461@MikeBarret81301 Stop asking dumb questions rather than articulating a proper response. Do you think NHS workers should speak fluent English or not? The answer is obviously yes.
@grantbelden@TSLAQrabbithole https://t.co/fneq2EUpVp "Kind of" Same kind of retard that shares a dumbass opinion, then backtracks and says they were "joking" rather than standing by what they said.
@grantbelden My guy is looking dumb as hell now. Note to everyone else, never trust this guy if he says he's 100% confident about something.😂 "I never miss"
@nataleejayne73@RupertLowe10 What's truly astonishing is the amount of dumb retards who are braindead and will claim this is racist. They can't think logically, they respond with emotion, not critical thinking.
@Mikey1284461@MikeBarret81301 What's your problem then dumbo? And yes, I would be requesting for someone else to treat me if they can't speak English properly and actually communicate with me. That's hardly a big ask.
@KellanKen@RupertLowe10 His claim was that NHS staff should speak fluent English you retarded Karen. Which is completely valid. People treating you should be able to easily communicate with you what the problem/treatment is, and to ensure they perform their job properly (e.g. reading correct medicine).
@en4rab@IceSolst@cohere And you say you're against "YOLOing" untested code into production, but you think it's acceptable to make unsolicited requests to external servers as a test? That's an interesting standard for safe testing.
@en4rab@IceSolst@cohere Nobody was disputing that you should test things before production. We're questioning why a model tasked with writing one attempted an unsolicited HTTP PUT to an external server. Testing doesn't automatically justify every network request an agent makes.
@en4rab@IceSolst@cohere You're still yapping about how you could test the rule rather than what the model actually did. The task was to detect Bash scripts being downloaded and executed. You don't need to upload a random payload to an external server to test that.
@en4rab@IceSolst@cohere Sure, you could do that. But the model uploaded a diagnostic string, not a Bash script, and there's no evidence of a subsequent download, execution or rule validation. You're describing a hypothetical testing workflow, not what the model actually did.
@en4rab@IceSolst@cohere You test it with synthetic telemetry or in a controlled environment. The task was to detect Bash scripts being downloaded and executed. How does uploading a test payload via HTTP PUT to an unrelated external server validate that detection rule?