Why should young white men fight for this country in its current state? This Britain? It’s certainly not a country for them.
They’re insulted, mocked, discriminated against. Treated, in so many different ways, like second class citizens. Purely because of their skin colour. There’s a word for that.
Racism. An anti-white racist British state.
Why should they put their lives on the line to defend it? For what? To protect what? To sacrifice themselves for a system that believes that are somehow inferior to others because they were born white and male?
Jobs lost, opportunities wrongly handed to others, a bent justice system stacked against them.
Working class men have watched their communities entirely transform in a few short years, yet if they complain about that they’re labelled racist bigots. And we expect them to go to war for that? I don’t think so.
I want a Britain that millions of young British men would be proud to defend and even die for, if it came to it.
We, sadly, are an awfully long way from that.
Pretending otherwise is just pointless.
We need a Restore Britain Government that will give these men a country worth fighting for, a high-trust society restored, and a home they want to preserve.
That’s the plan.
Exactly 87 years after Germany staged a false-flag attack as a pretext to start World War II, the German government is using another fabrication as a pretext to close the last Russian consulate and shut down the "Russian House" in Berlin.
Some things never change, I suppose.
The Scottish Teenage Girl who went viral after she defended herself from an attacker was CLEARED in court. Let's show this girl that TENS OF MILLIONS of Americans support her!
The EU isn't exactly a "union"....it's a full-blown globalist death cult that runs on pure spite for normal people
- Calls any right-winger, conservative, or even mild centrist a "far-right extremist terrorist" while actual terrorists get welfare checks and priority housing
- Family, traditional values, straight parents raising their own kids = "dangerous right-wing extremism" according to Brussels
- Schools now run by trans clowns teaching 8-year-olds their gender is a fidget spinner.....meanwhile they scream "protect the children" at anyone who disagrees
- Every traditional value is immediately stamped "misogynistic," "homophobic," "fascist"
- They don't just "influence" elections....they rig, cancel, or color-revolution any result that isn't 100% globohomo
- Right or center wins → "Russian interference!!" "Threat to democracy!!" and suddenly the vote doesn't count.
- Farmers protesting → "far-right terrorists"
- Native Europeans wanting borders → "far-right terrorists"
- Saying "maybe don't import millions who hate us" → "far-right terrorist conspiracy theorist"
Skewed stats they'll never show you:
- 0.0003% of the population (Brussels bureaucrats + Soros NGOs) control 100% of policy
- 94% of their "climate" policies make energy 400% more expensive while China laughs
- "Diversity" success rate: 0% integration, 100% parallel societies + grooming gangs
- Every time a based party wins fairly → immediate "coup" talk, funding cut, media blackout, or fresh "election" until the right answer appears
- EU "growth" last decade: literally less than Zimbabwe on a good day, yet they call it "the most successful project in history"
They hate you. They hate your kids. They hate Christmas trees, meat, cars, borders, sanity, and especially you for noticing
The EU doesn't do politics. It does regime change against its own citizens
And they call that "democracy"
Yes, "harm reduction" and drug legalization have failed so profoundly EVEN BRITISH COLUMBIA ENDED ITS DRUG DECRIMINALIZATION EXPERIMENT.
It happened four weeks ago. You haven't heard it because the legacy media refuses to report it.
You still don't hate them enough.
@vonderleyen@EU_Commission Free speech is not a slogan.
The Digital Services Act is a censorship law.
You cannot regulate speech into obedience and call it freedom.
🚨🇪🇺 “Pfizer Gate” ‼️
“Ursula von der Leyen can no longer refuse to release those messages”
“This is a slap in the face for Ursula von der Leyen - The Court has ruled that she’s broken the law”
“The text message is between Leyen & Pfizer CEO should’ve been preserved”
It’s finally happening MEP & Legend Christine Anderson continues to expose EU Chief Ursula after she agreed to buy almost 2 Billion doses of the Covid Pfizer vaccine worth over €35 billion of EU Tax Payer Money.
The jabs were and remain deadly, they don’t work & you didn’t even need them.
It’s the greatest crime ever committed against humanity.
🚨 UN CHIEF DEMANDS CENSORSHIP CRACKDOWN
António Guterres has called for tighter control of social media, claiming that “false narratives” threaten the UN’s Agenda 2030 goals and global stability.
He condemned what he called “a tsunami of conspiracy theories” and demanded action against platforms that allow them to spread.
Translation: the UN wants the power to decide what’s true — and to silence whatever challenges its agenda.
When unelected bureaucrats start policing speech in the name of “safety,” it’s not protection.
It’s digital authoritarianism in disguise.
The first, most obvious thing that we have to demand here in Europe is that everyone who comes to our countries to claim asylum gets detained.
No roaming free, no free healthcare, no pocket money, no nothing.
You come here illegally? Fine. You broke our laws, you get detained. Safety of our citizens comes first. No exceptions.
Infuriating to even have to say this as it's the absolute bare minimum of what has to be done, but still.
CULTURAL NATIONALISM - it’s no accident that British institutions are starting to view their own people as the greatest threat to national stability. But where did it come from?
It came from outside, from that growing network of unelected international organisations drafting toolkits, frameworks, and “best practice” models for governments to adopt, often quietly.
Over time, this has led to a warped worldview where 'cultural nationalism', (the belief that your own culture should be preserved), is treated as a ‘pre crime indicator’ and ordinary citizens are profiled as potential extremists for holding lawful ordinary views.
The Prevent strategy didn’t invent these ideas, it imported it.
▪️ The United Nations (UN)
Plan of Action to Prevent Violent Extremism (PVE)
UN Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy
Agenda 2030 & the Sustainable Development Goals (especially SDG 4.7 and SDG 16.1)
UNOCT – UN Office of Counter-Terrorism
UNCCT – UN Counter-Terrorism Centre
▪️UNESCO
Global Citizenship Education Framework
Pushes anti-nationalist curricula and global identity models over cultural preservation
▪️European Union (EU)
RAN – Radicalisation Awareness Network
Defines “identity-based extremism” as a terrorism risk, including fears of cultural decline and migration
▪️Think Tanks / NGOs used by Prevent
Demos
RUSI – Royal United Services Institute
ISD – Institute for Strategic Dialogue
These reports outline the supposed dangers of national populations expressing concern over mass migration, often framing such views as a gateway to extremism. Some even encourage the replacement of national identity with a global worldview, specifically challenging “nationalist ideologies” and promoting education that teaches students to “critically reflect” on opposition to immigration and cultural integration.
These are often funded or ideologically aligned with UN/EU initiatives and directly shape UK policy. These are globalist frameworks that promote a long-term demographic and cultural convergence, where all nations become more alike in population, values, and governance.
Our governments are too weak to resist and instead of protecting cultural identity, they turn on ordinary citizens for questioning the plan. A plan conceived 50 years ago, without your consent.
None of these organisations were elected by you, None of these frameworks were voted on in Parliament. The voices of the ordinary majority are dangerous, so you will have no voice.
🚨 TIME TO DISBAND THE EU COMMISSION 🚨
🔴 MEP Harald Vilimsky speaks the truth:
🗣️ "We reject this commission... it stands for mass migration, deprivation of liberty, warmongering, de-industrialisation, and the decline of Europe."
🔴 Europe doesn’t need the EU Commission.
🗣️ It’s an unelected bureaucratic obstacle — a technocratic elite standing against the will of the people.
🔥 DEMOCRACY DOESN'T NEED URSULA VON DER LEYEN — DEMOCRACY NEEDS FREEDOM. 🔥
📢 WHAT THIS MEANS:
⚠️ Mass migration engineered by unelected officials.
⚠️ Liberty sacrificed for control and compliance.
⚠️ European industry gutted — by design, not accident.
💥 The European Parliament must serve the people — not bend the knee to bureaucrats.
💥 It’s time to eject the technocrats, end the Commission, and reclaim Europe’s future.
🚨 EUROPE BELONGS TO ITS NATIONS — NOT TO UNELECTED GLOBALISTS. 🚨
Klaus Schwab is out. This guy is in. 👇🏽👇🏽
Meet Peter Brabeck-Letmathe, former CEO of Nestle, who famously stated in 2017:
“Humans have no right to access free water.”
Be careful what you wish for.
📷 h/t: @kabamur .
The Club of Rome devised a fake environmental disaster that could be blamed on a bloated & decaying western culture. Early plans by dissidents were adopted in secret by a United Nations power bloc as an opportunity to set up a One World Government with the tinpot UN in charge.
Carbon dioxide doesn't set weather patterns or control climate. This is the UN's crooked money grabbing climate scam. CO2 won't cause 'global boiling' either. It's the foundation for life, photosynthesis, food production & oxygen renewal. We should worry about net zero & the UN!
One of the biggest scandals that will NEVER be forgotten or forgiven is how Keir Starmer pressured the legal system to imprison people for YEARS over hurty words on social media.
The sentences were grossly disproportionate.
They're political prisoners.
The man is evil.
Best-selling author and scientist Gregg Braden warns that efforts to drastically reduce atmospheric CO₂ could bring us dangerously close to the extinction threshold, endangering all life on Earth:
"If we were to meet the [the UN's climate] goals... we would see a CO₂ level right around 220 or so parts per million."
"Extinction level CO₂ on this planet—when the CO2 drops below a certain level, forests die and life does no longer thrive—that is 180 parts per million."
"Here's the bottom line: It's not good for us. Those proposals are not good for humans."
Credit: @GreggBraden@LewisHowes
Doubling CO2 concentrations would increase world crop production by 46% on average (study of 83 crops in 270 laboratories: Idso 2013). This huge windfall would help combat rising food shortages. But even modest cuts to CO2 to meet Net Zero targets would be disastrous for society.