Luke Yamaguchi

Health educator and wellness consultant creating greater well-being in our world through education and empowerment. Tweets are not medical advice.

[Aaron Siri @AaronSiriSG]

FDA’s vaccine committee just shamelessly voted to recommend an updated Covid-19 vaccine, ignoring its incredible trail of harm. Here is the text of the three-minute speech I delivered to the committee before they voted: 

If you’re interested in making an evidenced-based and not belief-based decision regarding Covid-19 vaccines, please review the data and evidence in the letter we submitted to this committee.

Don’t ignore the tens of thousands of individuals that have contacted just our law firm regarding serious injuries from Covid-19 vaccine.

Don’t ignore the over 40 thousand individuals seriously injured from these products that are members of just one group – React19.

Don’t ignore the fact CDC fought us in court for over 2 years to hide from the public the data which showed that over 7% of the 10 million V-safe users reported needing medical care after a Covid-19 vaccine, on average 2 to 3 times each, with over 70% of those medical encounters resulting in hospitalization, emergency room or urgent care.

Don’t ignore the fact FDA fought for years to hide the data, which has been just recently released, showing that when FDA properly conducted Empirical Bayesian analysis internally, it resulted in incredible safety signals that were hidden from the public.

Don’t ignore the fact that in the clinical trial for Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine there were 21 deaths in the vaccinated group and 17 deaths in the placebo group, meaning more in the vaccinated group, during the same time period and I note the placebo group actually had slightly more people than the vaccinated group.

Don’t forget that those seriously injured by these products have been abandoned because pharma has been given complete immunity for their injuries under the PREP Act and the CICP has almost no funding to pay claims and is designed to deny compensation – to call the CICP a perverse mockery of justice and betrayal would be far too kind.

Five years after assuring the world these products are safe, they still need PREP Act immunity for the harms they supposedly won’t cause.

Until this immunity is lifted and the harms actually accounted for, this committee should decline to recommend any further Covid-19 vaccines.

But, given the prior statements made by some members of this committee about these products, statements reflecting belief- and not evidence-based views about them, it will no doubt be hard to objectively consider the data and evidence regarding these products. But please try. Thank you.

https://t.co/7xTXO0dPv8

[Luke Yamaguchi @gutresolution]

@WhiteHouse Genius-level marketing move right here.

[Luke Yamaguchi @gutresolution]

@JoeRoganRecaps Grok knocks it out of the park with its answer to this question: https://t.co/4QF4fyN32b

[Luke Yamaguchi @gutresolution]

@TulsiGabbard @ODNIgov Thank you for your service Tulsi!

[Luke Yamaguchi @gutresolution]

A new documentary film called 'Duty to Disobey' is premiering on June 30. Using this link you should also be able to watch all three Vaxxed documentaries for free.
https://t.co/yU3LjKMAmO

[Luke Yamaguchi @gutresolution]

@garysavage1 @AngelaBelcamino This was my experience as well. Never got vaccinated and only got COVID once.

[Champagne Joshi @JoshWalkos]

Anders Sørensen, a Danish clinical psychologist and researcher known for his work on psychiatric drug withdrawal and hyperbolic tapering, spoke Monday at the MAHA Institute summit about psychiatric drug dependency and withdrawal.

Listen closely to what he says.

[Camus @newstart_2024]

“I’m 23 years old… and my clitoris is completely numb, like the back of my elbow. I can’t orgasm. I can’t feel love for my own mother. I can’t even enjoy music anymore.”

That was Laureen Friedman’s raw testimony at a recent Safety Advocates on Mental Health Care panel.

She lives with PSSD — Post-SSRI Sexual Dysfunction. After taking Zoloft, she woke up one day with total genital numbness, zero libido, permanent inability to orgasm, and a sudden emotional numbness she describes as “chemical castration” and an “emotional lobotomy.” What used to be a deeply emotional, empathetic, songwriting young woman now feels disconnected from the core human experiences of love and pleasure.

She says she was never warned this could happen even after stopping the drug.

Millions are prescribed SSRIs every year, often without being told about rare but potentially permanent side effects like PSSD. People deserve full informed consent about what they’re risking.

Have you or anyone you know experienced lasting sexual or emotional side effects from antidepressants?

[Rand Paul @RandPaul]

The DOJ's deadline to charge Fauci for lying under oath about funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan is in 6 days. We can’t allow the statute of limitations to run out. He MUST be charged!

Agree? RT.

[Rand Paul @RandPaul]

The DOJ has ONE WEEK left to charge Anthony Fauci for the worst cover-up in modern medical history.

He lied to Congress about funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan. Millions died. Trillions were spent. And Fauci walked away with book deals and fawning media coverage instead of handcuffs. I re-upped my criminal referral to the DOJ because the evidence is overwhelming, and justice has been delayed long enough.

RT if you’re ready to see Fauci behind bars.

[Rand Paul @RandPaul]

The COVID cover-up goes all the way to the top. Fauci funded the Wuhan lab. Senior intelligence officials hid classified evidence from the president himself. Scientists were silenced. Millions paid the price.

The DOJ has until May 11th to prosecute Fauci before the statute of limitations runs out.

I am not letting this go. The American people deserve justice.

[Nancy Mace @NancyMace]

The five-year statute of limitations on Anthony Fauci's perjury before Congress expires on May 11. The Department of Justice has eleven days to act.

Dr. Fauci lied under oath about research the National Institutes of Health was funding overseas, research the Government Accountability Office and the NIH's own deputy director have since confirmed.

The American people were ordered into quarantine. Masked. Separated from dying parents. Locked out of their churches.

The American people deserve answers.

[Luke Yamaguchi @gutresolution]

@JamieBonkiewicz Wow. That's a pretty wild take.

[Luke Yamaguchi @gutresolution]

@DrunkRepub 🤣

[Luke Yamaguchi @gutresolution]

@DrEricDing What's the efficacy rate for flu vaccines again?

[Sama Hoole @SamaHoole]

The year is 1950. Your doctor lights a cigarette and tells you smoking is fine. He read it in a study. He is telling the truth about having read it. He does not know, or is not saying, that the study was funded by the tobacco industry.

The year is 1958. Your doctor tells you to eat less fat. The evidence is contested. The contestation is not in the public messaging. The food industry has been helpful in clarifying which findings deserve attention. Some researchers who published contradictory data have been quietly defunded. Ancel Keys is on the cover of Time magazine.

The year is 1962. Your doctor prescribes thalidomide to your pregnant wife for morning sickness. It has been approved. The FDA gave it the green light in Europe. Twelve thousand children will be born with severe limb malformations before anyone in an official capacity acknowledges the problem. The families are told the drug was safe. The drug was approved. Both of these things remain true.

The year is 1972. Your doctor prescribes Valium. Britain is in the grip of a benzodiazepine wave that will last two decades. The dependency risk is known internally. It is not shared. Your doctor is not lying to you. He was not told either.

The year is 1999. Your doctor prescribes Vioxx for your arthritis. It is newer than ibuprofen, well-tolerated, and Merck has a study showing it works. Merck also has internal data suggesting it roughly doubles the risk of heart attack. This data will not reach your doctor for four more years. Fifty thousand people are estimated to have died in the interim. Merck eventually settles for 4.85 billion dollars. No criminal charges are brought.

The year is 2002. Your doctor prescribes OxyContin. Purdue Pharma trained its sales representatives to tell doctors the addiction risk was less than one percent. That figure came from a letter, not a study. The letter was about patients with terminal cancer on short-term doses in hospital settings. Your doctor is a GP with a patient who has a bad back. Nobody draws a distinction. Nobody is required to.

The year is 2008. Your doctor checks your cholesterol. Your LDL is elevated. You are prescribed a statin. Nobody mentions that the number needed to treat for primary prevention is approximately 250. Nobody mentions that the muscle deterioration you'll notice over the next two years is listed as a rare side effect rather than a documented pattern affecting a meaningful percentage of patients. The trial that informed the prescription was funded by the manufacturer.

Now it is today.

Your doctor has new guidelines. New studies. New consensus.

He is confident.

He has always been confident.

The confidence has never been the problem.

The confidence is, in fact, precisely the problem.

[Kenny Carmody @KennyCarmody]

Something worth understanding about why so many people still do not question the COVID injections.

It is not simply laziness or indifference. The psychology of not-knowing is more active than that. For many people, the effort required to genuinely examine what happened would mean confronting the possibility that they were deceived by institutions they trusted, that decisions they made cannot be unmade, and that people they dismissed or treated poorly were raising legitimate concerns. Some may call it Cognitive Dissonance.

That is a significant psychological cost. And many people are simply not ready to pay it.

But the facts remain regardless.

The definition of vaccine was changed by the CDC in 2021, from a product that produces immunity to one that produces an immune response. The change was not incidental. The mRNA products did not meet the prior definition and the definition was adjusted to accommodate them.

The trials that supported emergency authorisation were of insufficient duration to assess long-term safety. The participants who experienced adverse events were in some cases removed from the efficacy analysis. The placebo group was vaccinated early, eliminating the possibility of genuine long-term comparison.

The transmission protection that was used to justify mandates, the claim that vaccination prevented you from passing the virus to others, was never established by the trial data and was acknowledged by Pfizer’s own representative under European Parliament questioning to not have been studied.

These are not interpretations. They are documented.

[Luke Yamaguchi @gutresolution]

@AaronSiriSG @realDonaldTrump Gosh darn-it.

[Luke Yamaguchi @gutresolution]

@elonmusk 😅

[Luke Yamaguchi @gutresolution]

@CMShehbaz Thank you for working for peace in the world.