@KatjaGrace On the other hand, lacking our social mores, it could easily determine that killing every human being is the most efficient way to achieve some other goal it is given, e.g. "minimize human suffering" -- no more humans means no more human suffering.
@KatjaGrace I am somewhere around here on the whole issue. From what I've seen, I'm unconvinced that we've reached a point where AI is even capable of independently wanting anything, let alone to kill us all.
@ChurchofSatan@dorfmeisterdo By definition anyone who ever speaks has last words once they pass away. Are you saying Anton LaVey was a lifelong mute, or that he never died?
@SenSanders So, thought experiment: assuming we're currently on the path to artificial superintelligence (ASI), which is debatable, does this result in no one creating ASI, or does it result in ASI being created in secret with less oversight and fewer guard rails?
@slatestarcodex@hormeze I think the framework is sound but "solemn" is not the right adjective. It's more like "deeply engaged". As adults we engage in important things, but children engage in unimportant things as well, including giggling or following your mood moment to moment.
@s8n I always worded this differently. I don't care why there's a gap in their resume, life happens. So I said "is there anything you'd like to highlight about what you were doing during this gap?", in case they were like, building houses for Habitat for Humanity or some shit.