![cirnosad's tweet photo. To recap the missiles that can be considered reasonable suspects, given the energy requirement and the export status are:
- The Kh-22M air-launched missile.
- The P-270 ship-launched missile.
- The P-35 ship-launched missile.
There is also one more candidate, due to an important incident that will be stated later:
- The P-700 submarine-launched missile, aka wet launched.
These have the energy to penetrate the outer and inner Pentagon walls along the first floor E-C rings.
But can we eliminate some candidates using one more clue? Some staff at the Pentagon were unfortunately murdered in this incident. A total of 55 active military personnel across the army, navy and marines. We can thus deduce that they at least were not in on this operation. It is inconceivable that the majority would have been in on it at all, in fact to be an insider you would have to be outside the Pentagon on that day.
Why is this important? It means the launch had to be undetectable until the missile was in the air. Between the coast guard, the air force and NORAD, the US was able to detect and track threats to its homeland early and despite the end of the cold war, the US was still on alert as it was engaged in multiple wars at the time.
From these missiles there are only three realistic scenarios. Let's begin by eliminating the most obvious impossibility:
1. An air launched missile, from the ground or air.
Let's say the Kh-22M was smuggled from Ukraine into the United States. You cannot exactly wheel it around the US undetected. Even if you somehow evade all of the interior security, you still have to smuggle this missile into the country. People will ask questions and the mission will inevitably fail. So a ground launch can be eliminated as an option.
Is an air launch, as designed, realistic then? No because we can actually count which planes can carry out such an Kh-22M attack: The Tu-95, the Tu-22[M/M2/M3], B-1B lancer, B-2 Spirit, B-52 bomber. And here I'm being generous and assuming the American planes are going to be heavily modified to carry and launch such an incompatible missile. Not even the F-15 can launch the Kh-22M, because its span is half its length. Such a mission will be detected early or will involve insiders. It will also involve smuggling such jets, the only realistic one being one of the Tu-22 variants operated by Ukraine. Thus, an air launch can be eliminated as an option.
We can thus conclude the Kh-22M was not used on 9/11.
2. A ship launch.
This is arguably even worse than an air launch. All of these missiles are large and easily detected. You have to prepare them on the surface of a ship, and do so near the US coastline. You cannot launch these from shipping containers, and none of them are vertical launch missiles. They need to be raised, inclined and then launched from a large ship.
It will be detected and this mission will fail. Thus, a ship launch be eliminated as an option.
That leaves us with only one option.
3. A submerged launch, or as it is named, a wet launch.
In this scenario, a very slow moving specialised container vessel carries the missile to its launch site, well below the surface. It can be brought near the location by a merchant submarine. The missile can then be launched without being detected and even the booster stage will be completed during the duration that it is submerged. By the time it's in the air it will be at cruise speed.
Of all the scenarios, the submerged option is the most stealthy and flexible. One the missile is in position, it can remain on the sea floor without anyone knowing. This is the principle that the Russian Poseidon operates on. That gives the suspects as much time as is necessary to place the missiles on the sea floor along the US coastline as necessary.
The only difficulty is the bespoke positioning and launch platform itself, but this can be engineered many years (or decades) ahead of this operation and is actually something any small nation can pull off if given the time and motivation.
We can thus conclude that a submerged (or "wet") launch is the only realistic scenario. And only one missile we have not eliminated is capable of it.
The P-700 Granit.
In fact, the P-700 must always be wet launched, even on surface ships using a flood tube. It was designed for a wet launched, and was a Soviet Union sneak attack weapon. It used reinforced armor so that even air defenses cannot stop it. It even employed a multi-missile swarm network, allowing it to coordinate without human intervention once a mission has programmed on all missiles in use.
Thus, even under the two wall scenario, we arrive at precisely one murder weapon: the P-700 Granit.
Well, there's one problem though: How did the suspects obtain this weapon? It was never exported outside of Russia or the Soviet Union. It was never in the hands of Ukraine. I did promise I will explain this...
To get our answer, we have to go back just over a year before September 11 happened.
Specifically, August 12, 2000.
/6](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HTVyekKboAAf1Po.jpg)
![cirnosad's tweet photo. To recap the missiles that can be considered reasonable suspects, given the energy requirement and the export status are:
- The Kh-22M air-launched missile.
- The P-270 ship-launched missile.
- The P-35 ship-launched missile.
There is also one more candidate, due to an important incident that will be stated later:
- The P-700 submarine-launched missile, aka wet launched.
These have the energy to penetrate the outer and inner Pentagon walls along the first floor E-C rings.
But can we eliminate some candidates using one more clue? Some staff at the Pentagon were unfortunately murdered in this incident. A total of 55 active military personnel across the army, navy and marines. We can thus deduce that they at least were not in on this operation. It is inconceivable that the majority would have been in on it at all, in fact to be an insider you would have to be outside the Pentagon on that day.
Why is this important? It means the launch had to be undetectable until the missile was in the air. Between the coast guard, the air force and NORAD, the US was able to detect and track threats to its homeland early and despite the end of the cold war, the US was still on alert as it was engaged in multiple wars at the time.
From these missiles there are only three realistic scenarios. Let's begin by eliminating the most obvious impossibility:
1. An air launched missile, from the ground or air.
Let's say the Kh-22M was smuggled from Ukraine into the United States. You cannot exactly wheel it around the US undetected. Even if you somehow evade all of the interior security, you still have to smuggle this missile into the country. People will ask questions and the mission will inevitably fail. So a ground launch can be eliminated as an option.
Is an air launch, as designed, realistic then? No because we can actually count which planes can carry out such an Kh-22M attack: The Tu-95, the Tu-22[M/M2/M3], B-1B lancer, B-2 Spirit, B-52 bomber. And here I'm being generous and assuming the American planes are going to be heavily modified to carry and launch such an incompatible missile. Not even the F-15 can launch the Kh-22M, because its span is half its length. Such a mission will be detected early or will involve insiders. It will also involve smuggling such jets, the only realistic one being one of the Tu-22 variants operated by Ukraine. Thus, an air launch can be eliminated as an option.
We can thus conclude the Kh-22M was not used on 9/11.
2. A ship launch.
This is arguably even worse than an air launch. All of these missiles are large and easily detected. You have to prepare them on the surface of a ship, and do so near the US coastline. You cannot launch these from shipping containers, and none of them are vertical launch missiles. They need to be raised, inclined and then launched from a large ship.
It will be detected and this mission will fail. Thus, a ship launch be eliminated as an option.
That leaves us with only one option.
3. A submerged launch, or as it is named, a wet launch.
In this scenario, a very slow moving specialised container vessel carries the missile to its launch site, well below the surface. It can be brought near the location by a merchant submarine. The missile can then be launched without being detected and even the booster stage will be completed during the duration that it is submerged. By the time it's in the air it will be at cruise speed.
Of all the scenarios, the submerged option is the most stealthy and flexible. One the missile is in position, it can remain on the sea floor without anyone knowing. This is the principle that the Russian Poseidon operates on. That gives the suspects as much time as is necessary to place the missiles on the sea floor along the US coastline as necessary.
The only difficulty is the bespoke positioning and launch platform itself, but this can be engineered many years (or decades) ahead of this operation and is actually something any small nation can pull off if given the time and motivation.
We can thus conclude that a submerged (or "wet") launch is the only realistic scenario. And only one missile we have not eliminated is capable of it.
The P-700 Granit.
In fact, the P-700 must always be wet launched, even on surface ships using a flood tube. It was designed for a wet launched, and was a Soviet Union sneak attack weapon. It used reinforced armor so that even air defenses cannot stop it. It even employed a multi-missile swarm network, allowing it to coordinate without human intervention once a mission has programmed on all missiles in use.
Thus, even under the two wall scenario, we arrive at precisely one murder weapon: the P-700 Granit.
Well, there's one problem though: How did the suspects obtain this weapon? It was never exported outside of Russia or the Soviet Union. It was never in the hands of Ukraine. I did promise I will explain this...
To get our answer, we have to go back just over a year before September 11 happened.
Specifically, August 12, 2000.
/6](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HTVyd8QaYAA0Qqe.jpg)
Olivia
Online
Tanya Ridlogv
@gynxo
Joined July 2016
713 Following
203 Followers
8.5K Posts
Taiz will decide the outcome of the war in Yemen.
Pray for Ansarallah's victory.
Simon was murdered for this recently, and the goyimforce (police) are ruling it a "sewercide" of course.
Funny how all the selective moralists who praised Ukraine’s attacks on the bridge in Russia’s Crimea are now squealing when Russia hits the bridges in Kiev and calling it a “war crime.”
Btw, who remembers this fella? 👇🏻
🧵🇸🇾 1/5 Syrian War Death Toll Thread
In the Assad vs. Jolani debate, @doctor_rahmeh seemed to suggest that Assad was just as bad as Israel in terms of violence commanded against civilians (see video).
In the debate, @doomernat22 responded by pointing out that in Syria there were around 200k pro-Assad combatant deaths, 200k anti-Assad combatant deaths, and 200k civilian deaths, whereas in Gaza, the civilian-to-combatant deathtoll is closer to "ten-to-one" (see video).
Doomernat is broadly correct.
In summary, this thread will show that in Syria, unarmed civilians were around 11% of the total deathtoll, whereas in Gaza, unarmed civilians could be up to 97% of the total deathtoll.
There's no moral equivalence between Assad and Israel either.
➡️ In Syria, both sides were fighting to rule the country with varying degrees of foreign assistance summoned by each side.
➡️ In Palestine, Israel is attempting to racially exterminate the Palestinians for not being Jewish, which is how the conflict began back in 1947.
Why does this matter?
Because all this moralising from supporters of the Jolani junta that rules Syria about how bad Assad was only serves to ensure that Syria remains non-cooperative with the Axis, and non-confrontational with Israel (see 1-2).
⬇️ First let's look at the Gaza deathtoll.
~References~
1) "Damascus Says Iran’s Support for Assad Cannot Be Ignored": https://t.co/yc4MWci39K
2) Iran demands $300 billion from Iran: https://t.co/2hgUoso75c
Who to follow
Leading Report 
@LeadingReport
Leading source for breaking news.
Tuvia Gering 陶文亚
@GeringTuvia
Planet Nine | Discourse Power on Substack | Non-resident Fellow @INSSIsrael, @ACGlobalChina | China-Israel | China-Middle East| @Krauthammer Alum |
1/4 Black Garrett
@QTRBlackGarrett
Co-Host of Friday Night Tights, Typo King. Internet drifter. Professional fool. Nightshift editor. All of my LINKS https://t.co/IZbjwGlqYd
All you need to do is look at what is happening in Syria to see why Sunnis are nothing more than bioweapons.
Sea Peoples 2.0.
We cannot coexist with these demonic creatures.
Kosher criminals busted again! Syracuse has had enough!
Notorious slumlord Mendy Kletzky who willfully neglected nearly 20 Syracuse properties with over 100 code violations for years has been kicked out of the city’s rental market. He also neglected to pay $340,000 worth of property taxes water bills for years.
A judge has given Kletzky, of Brooklyn, 90 days to sell the 18 rental properties he still owns in Syracuse. He must also pay $6.6 million in fines and interest for open code violations, including lead paint violations, going back as many as 1,000 days.
I wonder why his properties haven’t been seized?
Kletzky filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy of course in February 2026, which temporarily paused the city’s lawsuit, although his associated LLCs did not file for bankruptcy.
Does Kletzky have a criminal history?
Kletzky has been in legal conflict with Syracuse since 2007, including a 2018 guilty plea for lead paint violations, and has consistently used Limited Liability Companies (LLCs) to shield personal assets from judgments.
Good MiG-31I art from a talented artist.
Source: https://t.co/9YMkuExo8Q
Follow his tg channel, please :3
This creature injected a grieving mother of a Russian sailor aboard the Kursk, angrily shouting at a Russian deputy PM (✡️) with a sedative that made her faint.
It's almost impossible to obtain a clean version of this video today. The AP video cuts just before this shown collusion among international Jewry.
Whenever we hear the canard of Hamas hiding weapons in a mosque, we should remember this historical plaque put up by the City of Tel Aviv celebrating the Jewish terrorist militia Lehi hiding weapons in the basement of a synagogue.
🇾🇪⚔️🇸🇦 Yemeni ballistic missiles struck Riyadh, the capital of Saudi Arabia, for the second consecutive day
Middle_East_Spectator
Funny thing is, life in most major Ukrainian cities stayed relatively comfortable for years after the war started. Busification was happening from year one, but really ramped up in late 2024. Russia didn't really target energy until early 2025. Can you imagine anything like that happening in a US war, that the enemy's population just keeps living normal, uninterrupted lives for years, going to restaurants and throwing huge parties? Some Age of Chivalry shit right there
It is useless to appeal to the humanity of those people who did it. These are not people, but demons. And their souls are damned forever. Therefore, Russia has no illusions about the US, Israel, or the West in general. We will continue what we do now.
Poor fools
👊👌
"I’m a 21-year-old Irishman"
🚨Prominent Saudi Scholar Says That It Is Forbidden To Fight Israel But Urges Muslims To Fight Yemen
Dr. Abdulaziz Al-Rayez has drawn major criticism after his double-standards were pointed out for the world to see.
This weaponisation of religious authority, directing Muslims to fight other Muslims & forbidding resistance against Israel has become a popular trend amongst Gulf backed scholars. It fits into a larger campaign led by Gulf Arab media to convince Muslims that their enemy is Iran & its allies, including the Palestinian resistance.
To recap the missiles that can be considered reasonable suspects, given the energy requirement and the export status are:
- The Kh-22M air-launched missile.
- The P-270 ship-launched missile.
- The P-35 ship-launched missile.
There is also one more candidate, due to an important incident that will be stated later:
- The P-700 submarine-launched missile, aka wet launched.
These have the energy to penetrate the outer and inner Pentagon walls along the first floor E-C rings.
But can we eliminate some candidates using one more clue? Some staff at the Pentagon were unfortunately murdered in this incident. A total of 55 active military personnel across the army, navy and marines. We can thus deduce that they at least were not in on this operation. It is inconceivable that the majority would have been in on it at all, in fact to be an insider you would have to be outside the Pentagon on that day.
Why is this important? It means the launch had to be undetectable until the missile was in the air. Between the coast guard, the air force and NORAD, the US was able to detect and track threats to its homeland early and despite the end of the cold war, the US was still on alert as it was engaged in multiple wars at the time.
From these missiles there are only three realistic scenarios. Let's begin by eliminating the most obvious impossibility:
1. An air launched missile, from the ground or air.
Let's say the Kh-22M was smuggled from Ukraine into the United States. You cannot exactly wheel it around the US undetected. Even if you somehow evade all of the interior security, you still have to smuggle this missile into the country. People will ask questions and the mission will inevitably fail. So a ground launch can be eliminated as an option.
Is an air launch, as designed, realistic then? No because we can actually count which planes can carry out such an Kh-22M attack: The Tu-95, the Tu-22[M/M2/M3], B-1B lancer, B-2 Spirit, B-52 bomber. And here I'm being generous and assuming the American planes are going to be heavily modified to carry and launch such an incompatible missile. Not even the F-15 can launch the Kh-22M, because its span is half its length. Such a mission will be detected early or will involve insiders. It will also involve smuggling such jets, the only realistic one being one of the Tu-22 variants operated by Ukraine. Thus, an air launch can be eliminated as an option.
We can thus conclude the Kh-22M was not used on 9/11.
2. A ship launch.
This is arguably even worse than an air launch. All of these missiles are large and easily detected. You have to prepare them on the surface of a ship, and do so near the US coastline. You cannot launch these from shipping containers, and none of them are vertical launch missiles. They need to be raised, inclined and then launched from a large ship.
It will be detected and this mission will fail. Thus, a ship launch be eliminated as an option.
That leaves us with only one option.
3. A submerged launch, or as it is named, a wet launch.
In this scenario, a very slow moving specialised container vessel carries the missile to its launch site, well below the surface. It can be brought near the location by a merchant submarine. The missile can then be launched without being detected and even the booster stage will be completed during the duration that it is submerged. By the time it's in the air it will be at cruise speed.
Of all the scenarios, the submerged option is the most stealthy and flexible. One the missile is in position, it can remain on the sea floor without anyone knowing. This is the principle that the Russian Poseidon operates on. That gives the suspects as much time as is necessary to place the missiles on the sea floor along the US coastline as necessary.
The only difficulty is the bespoke positioning and launch platform itself, but this can be engineered many years (or decades) ahead of this operation and is actually something any small nation can pull off if given the time and motivation.
We can thus conclude that a submerged (or "wet") launch is the only realistic scenario. And only one missile we have not eliminated is capable of it.
The P-700 Granit.
In fact, the P-700 must always be wet launched, even on surface ships using a flood tube. It was designed for a wet launched, and was a Soviet Union sneak attack weapon. It used reinforced armor so that even air defenses cannot stop it. It even employed a multi-missile swarm network, allowing it to coordinate without human intervention once a mission has programmed on all missiles in use.
Thus, even under the two wall scenario, we arrive at precisely one murder weapon: the P-700 Granit.
Well, there's one problem though: How did the suspects obtain this weapon? It was never exported outside of Russia or the Soviet Union. It was never in the hands of Ukraine. I did promise I will explain this...
To get our answer, we have to go back just over a year before September 11 happened.
Specifically, August 12, 2000.
/6
![cirnosad's tweet photo. To recap the missiles that can be considered reasonable suspects, given the energy requirement and the export status are:
- The Kh-22M air-launched missile.
- The P-270 ship-launched missile.
- The P-35 ship-launched missile.
There is also one more candidate, due to an important incident that will be stated later:
- The P-700 submarine-launched missile, aka wet launched.
These have the energy to penetrate the outer and inner Pentagon walls along the first floor E-C rings.
But can we eliminate some candidates using one more clue? Some staff at the Pentagon were unfortunately murdered in this incident. A total of 55 active military personnel across the army, navy and marines. We can thus deduce that they at least were not in on this operation. It is inconceivable that the majority would have been in on it at all, in fact to be an insider you would have to be outside the Pentagon on that day.
Why is this important? It means the launch had to be undetectable until the missile was in the air. Between the coast guard, the air force and NORAD, the US was able to detect and track threats to its homeland early and despite the end of the cold war, the US was still on alert as it was engaged in multiple wars at the time.
From these missiles there are only three realistic scenarios. Let's begin by eliminating the most obvious impossibility:
1. An air launched missile, from the ground or air.
Let's say the Kh-22M was smuggled from Ukraine into the United States. You cannot exactly wheel it around the US undetected. Even if you somehow evade all of the interior security, you still have to smuggle this missile into the country. People will ask questions and the mission will inevitably fail. So a ground launch can be eliminated as an option.
Is an air launch, as designed, realistic then? No because we can actually count which planes can carry out such an Kh-22M attack: The Tu-95, the Tu-22[M/M2/M3], B-1B lancer, B-2 Spirit, B-52 bomber. And here I'm being generous and assuming the American planes are going to be heavily modified to carry and launch such an incompatible missile. Not even the F-15 can launch the Kh-22M, because its span is half its length. Such a mission will be detected early or will involve insiders. It will also involve smuggling such jets, the only realistic one being one of the Tu-22 variants operated by Ukraine. Thus, an air launch can be eliminated as an option.
We can thus conclude the Kh-22M was not used on 9/11.
2. A ship launch.
This is arguably even worse than an air launch. All of these missiles are large and easily detected. You have to prepare them on the surface of a ship, and do so near the US coastline. You cannot launch these from shipping containers, and none of them are vertical launch missiles. They need to be raised, inclined and then launched from a large ship.
It will be detected and this mission will fail. Thus, a ship launch be eliminated as an option.
That leaves us with only one option.
3. A submerged launch, or as it is named, a wet launch.
In this scenario, a very slow moving specialised container vessel carries the missile to its launch site, well below the surface. It can be brought near the location by a merchant submarine. The missile can then be launched without being detected and even the booster stage will be completed during the duration that it is submerged. By the time it's in the air it will be at cruise speed.
Of all the scenarios, the submerged option is the most stealthy and flexible. One the missile is in position, it can remain on the sea floor without anyone knowing. This is the principle that the Russian Poseidon operates on. That gives the suspects as much time as is necessary to place the missiles on the sea floor along the US coastline as necessary.
The only difficulty is the bespoke positioning and launch platform itself, but this can be engineered many years (or decades) ahead of this operation and is actually something any small nation can pull off if given the time and motivation.
We can thus conclude that a submerged (or "wet") launch is the only realistic scenario. And only one missile we have not eliminated is capable of it.
The P-700 Granit.
In fact, the P-700 must always be wet launched, even on surface ships using a flood tube. It was designed for a wet launched, and was a Soviet Union sneak attack weapon. It used reinforced armor so that even air defenses cannot stop it. It even employed a multi-missile swarm network, allowing it to coordinate without human intervention once a mission has programmed on all missiles in use.
Thus, even under the two wall scenario, we arrive at precisely one murder weapon: the P-700 Granit.
Well, there's one problem though: How did the suspects obtain this weapon? It was never exported outside of Russia or the Soviet Union. It was never in the hands of Ukraine. I did promise I will explain this...
To get our answer, we have to go back just over a year before September 11 happened.
Specifically, August 12, 2000.
/6](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HTVygbMb0AAHLeX.jpg)
All this beauty had an even more beautiful name: Esraa Al-Hessi.
Before she could even turn five, an Israeli army sniper decided that she would be a target today. A single bullet struck her in the head while she was inside her tent east of Deir al-Balah.
What could a little girl who had not yet turned five have possibly done to become the target of a rifle?
She had barely begun to discover the world, but one bullet was enough to make this beautiful little girl sleep forever. She did not even know what death was.
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
241.8M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
114.6M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.9M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107.2M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98.7M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.4M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.8M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
90.1M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
84M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
75.5M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
73.5M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.9M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.8M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
66.5M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
65.3M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
63.1M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.3M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.8M followers
X
@x
60.7M followers