Standing behind a kid on the train, maybe 8-10 years old, and he's watching an AI edit of Jeffrey Epstein as Tony Stark start to finish on tiktok . He finished it and then gave it a like
We’re watching Bluey and one of her friend’s dads is in the army. I say “This is propaganda and that guy is a murderer.” My wife asks what is wrong with me and my kid tells me to “shut up.” I’m out of here. Time to get drunk. Fuck these people.
The next time Trump or any of his lackies wants to go on about “protecting women’s sports” from trans women, just remember the video of him mocking the women who won Olympic gold medals 4 days ago.
I'd loveee every player on team USA to explain the inciting the women's team "joke"(???) to me <3 would love to hear why they all erupted in laughter!!! im clearly a stupid moron bc i'm a woman and I don't get it!!! so please explain it to me!! 😝😝😍😍
It’s now ableist to say that Black people should be protected from being called a n*gger in front of a world audience. You lot are fucking jokers lol. You watched the smiles fade from those men’s face in real time and can’t empathise enough to think it should’ve been prevented.
can’t even put into words how insane it is that the stars of SINNERS had to deal with racial slurs being hurled at them while presenting an award and the only thing they get told is that the person has a disability so it can’t be helped
There should not be separate practical standards for how a woman registers to vote versus how a man registers to vote. A citizenship verification system that routinely requires women to produce more documentation than men to prove the same eligibility creates unequal access, even if the rule is written as gender neutral.
Millions of married and divorced women have legal names that no longer match their birth certificates, meaning they must provide additional records such as marriage licenses, court orders, or updated passports simply to clear the same hurdle as a man.
When one group must assemble a longer paper trail to exercise a fundamental right, that moves beyond routine administration. At best, it creates an additional and undue burden. At worst, it risks disenfranchising eligible voters who cannot easily obtain or afford those extra documents. Voting standards should be uniform and equal.
If I were a leftist, my thought process in 2016 would’ve been:
“Hillary is not my ideal candidate, but if we secure a liberal majority on the Supreme Court now, that could be useful for a further left candidate in 2020 or 2024”
Can a leftist tell why this wasn’t their mindset?
Republican bills are like "Murder is wrong and the age of consent is now nine years old." Democrats vote against it (because murder is already illegal) and republicans come back with, "WHY ARE DEMOCRATS PRO-MURDER?!"