Angiography-Derived FFR as Novel Parameter in Assessing Flow-Limiting CAD? Commentary https://t.co/vT2gjggYPg
on Westra et al.
https://t.co/m2TYsIecX3
Comparable diagnostic accuracy of QFR and invasively measured FFR but low concordance with PET determined MFR.
Published in IJC Heart & Vasculature.
DOI: https://t.co/LaikhYrFEr
In this analysis in a symptomatic cardio-metabolic risk population, 54% had evidence of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) as determined with PET. Thereof, 65% had classical CMD and 35% had endogen CMD.
@DrMarthaGulati Normally, editors take out insulting comments but sometimes they may miss it. I always tell my fellows, "when you want to publish, you need thick skin and don't take reviewer comments personally". Just keep going .....
This #WomensHistoryMonth, we're shining a spotlight on #RadWomen leaders at MIR.
Farrokh Dehdashti, MD, is the Drs. Barry A. & Marilyn J. Siegel Professor of Radiology, senior vice chair and division director of nuclear medicine.
@lesleejshaw I believe this will be an ongoing investigation for years to come.... In the end there is much clinical reasoning when you weigh in all factors such as age, symptoms, comorbities, LVEF etc. for optimal patient care!