𝓗𝓐𝓑𝓔𝓔𝓑 🇮🇶

𝘐𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘣𝘢𝘤𝘬𝘨𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘴, 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘴𝘪𝘭𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘴 𝘸𝘦𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘱𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘴 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘬 𝘤𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘭𝘺.

[𝓗𝓐𝓑𝓔𝓔𝓑 🇮🇶 @ha_b0520]

@Latitude32_ @Osint613 A diplomatic answer to keep all sides happy 😃

[𝓗𝓐𝓑𝓔𝓔𝓑 🇮🇶 @ha_b0520]

@fahad_x_fahad @Alberteins1383 @ErbilCitaden كعادتكم تعوون وتسبون ومن واحد يرد عليكم تصيرون فيران 😂

[𝓗𝓐𝓑𝓔𝓔𝓑 🇮🇶 @ha_b0520]

يومُ عاشوراءَ ليس يومَ نزاعٍ تاريخيٍّ فقط، بل هو مدرسةٌ خالدةٌ في معنى الإيمان حين يختبره الظلم، وفي معنى الثبات حين يُحاصر الحق من كل جانب. فيه وقف الإمام الحسين عليه السلام وقفةً لا تشبه وقوف البشر العاديين، بل وقفةَ صاحبِ مبدأٍ يرى الموتَ أهون من أن يمد يده لبيعةٍ تُحوِّل الحقَّ إلى باطل، والعدلَ إلى سلطانٍ جائر.

خرج الحسين لا طلبًا لدنيا ولا رغبةً في سلطان، بل كما قال بنفسه: «إنما خرجتُ لطلبِ الإصلاح في أمة جدي، أريد أن آمر بالمعروف وأنهى عن المنكر». فصار عاشوراء ميزانًا تُوزن به القيم لا الأجساد، وتُقاس به المواقف لا الأعداد.

وفي كربلاء تجلّت أعظم معاني الصبر؛ قلةٌ مع الحقّ في وجه كثرةٍ مع القوة، ودماء طاهرة كُتبت بها شهادةُ أن الكرامة ليست شعارًا بل تضحية. لم يكن يوم الحسين هزيمةً كما يراه البعض، بل كان ولادةً للوعي الإنسانيّ حين يُدرك أن الباطل قد ينتصر بالسيف، لكنه لا ينتصر في الضمير.

فسلامٌ على الحسين يوم وُلد، ويوم وقف، ويوم استُشهد، ويوم يُبعث حيًّا في قلوب الأحرار، وسلامٌ على من حملوا معه رسالة أن الحقَّ لا يُقاس بكثرةٍ ولا يُهزم وإن قلّ أنصاره.

[𝓗𝓐𝓑𝓔𝓔𝓑 🇮🇶 @ha_b0520]

@QaisLaMukh @TexanWaffenSS @NYCMayor “ألستُ أولى بالمؤمنين من أنفسهم؟ فمن كنتُ مولاه فهذا عليٌّ مولاه، اللهم والِ من والاه، وعادِ من عاداه، وانصر من نصره، واخذل من خذله، وأدر الحق معه حيث دار.”

[𝓗𝓐𝓑𝓔𝓔𝓑 🇮🇶 @ha_b0520]

So you accuse me of using AI because you can’t answer the arguments.

I brought “ألست أولى بالمؤمنين من أنفسهم؟” for a reason. It’s the sentence that immediately precedes “فمن كنت مولاه فعلي مولاه.” You can’t separate the two. The Prophet ﷺ first established his authority over the believers, then used the word mawla. That’s exactly why I brought it up.

And yes, I use AI to polish my English and fix spelling because English isn’t my first language. I don’t use it to invent history or fabricate evidence.

Every historical point I’ve made comes from sources that I can cite. If you think they’re wrong, refute the sources and the arguments—not my grammar or the fact that I use AI to improve my writing.

Attacking how I write instead of what I wrote only shows you have no answer to the actual evidence is all you have 😄.

[𝓗𝓐𝓑𝓔𝓔𝓑 🇮🇶 @ha_b0520]

Again, you resort to insulting mothers because you can’t address the actual issue.

You’re calling mut’ah “prostitution,” but that only shows you haven’t studied Shia fiqh.

In Shia jurisprudence, mut’ah is a marriage contract with clear conditions: mutual consent, a specified dowry (mahr), an agreed duration, observance of the waiting period (iddah) afterward, and any child born from it is fully legitimate with established lineage and parental responsibilities. Those are legal responsibilities—not prostitution.

You don’t have to agree with it. Sunnis reject it, and Shias accept it. But disagreeing with a ruling is different from deliberately misrepresenting it.

If you want an honest discussion, criticize what Shias actually believe—not a strawman filled with insults.

[𝓗𝓐𝓑𝓔𝓔𝓑 🇮🇶 @ha_b0520]

That explanation raises more questions than it answers.

If Ali had supposedly “failed,” why would the Prophet gather tens of thousands of Muslims, raise Ali’s hand before everyone, and end by saying, “O Allah, befriend whoever befriends him and oppose whoever opposes him”?

If it were only about calming a few complaints from Yemen, a private conversation with the complainants would have been enough. Instead, the Prophet made one of the most public declarations of his life immediately after the Farewell Pilgrimage.

Your explanation doesn’t fit the scale of the event. It reduces one of the most significant sermons in Islamic history to a local HR dispute.

[𝓗𝓐𝓑𝓔𝓔𝓑 🇮🇶 @ha_b0520]

You’re asserting your interpretation as if it’s the only one, but the Arabic language doesn’t support that.

The Prophet ﷺ first asked:

“ألستُ أولى بالمؤمنين من أنفسهم؟” (“Am I not more entitled to the believers than they are to themselves?”)

When they replied, “Yes,” he immediately said:

“فمن كنت مولاه فعلي مولاه.”

The connection between “أولى” (having greater authority) and “مولاه” is exactly why Shia scholars understand mawla here to mean authority and guardianship—not merely “close friend.”

This isn’t something Shias invented. Classical Arabic scholars such as Abu Ubaydah, al-Farra’, al-Zajjaj, and al-Zamakhshari all acknowledged that mawla can carry the meaning of “awla” (one with greater authority or entitlement) depending on the context.

As for Yemen, repeating “Ali was a joke” isn’t evidence. If the Prophet believed Ali had failed, why did he publicly praise him at Ghadir instead of publicly rebuking him? Your interpretation doesn’t answer that question—it simply assumes its own conclusion.

[𝓗𝓐𝓑𝓔𝓔𝓑 🇮🇶 @ha_b0520]

You keep calling mut’ah “prostitution,” but it’s obvious you haven’t actually studied what Shia scholars teach.

If you’re going to criticize mut’ah, at least learn what it is first. Don’t base your beliefs on random videos or propaganda. Throughout history, people have spread misinformation to discredit groups they disagree with. That’s why serious people go back to authentic sources, not viral clips.

Also, if you’re going to criticize Shia jurisprudence, be consistent. Some Sunni scholars permit misyar marriage, which is also a form of marriage with different conditions. Sunnis and Shias simply differ on which type of marriage they consider religiously valid.

Disagree if you want, but don’t replace scholarship with insults. If you’re interested in the truth, study both sides from their own sources instead of repeating stereotypes.

[𝓗𝓐𝓑𝓔𝓔𝓑 🇮🇶 @ha_b0520]

Your argument doesn’t hold up.

You say “mawla only means ally.” The Qur’an itself proves otherwise:

(فَنِعْمَ الْمَوْلَى وَنِعْمَ النَّصِيرُ)
(Qur’an 8:40)

Does that mean “Allah is your ally”—or your Protector and Guardian? The meaning of mawla depends on the context. It does not only mean “ally.”

As for Yemen, Imam Ali was carrying out the Prophet’s orders. Some people complained because he refused to bend the rules for them. The Prophet defended Ali—he did not condemn him.

And if Ghadir was only about a complaint from Yemen, why did the Prophet stop thousands of pilgrims after the Farewell Hajj, gather them in the desert, raise Ali’s hand publicly, and declare, “Whoever I am his Mawla, Ali is his Mawla”?

Your explanation doesn’t account for the scale and significance of what happened at Ghadir.

[𝓗𝓐𝓑𝓔𝓔𝓑 🇮🇶 @ha_b0520]

I’ve said what I had to say.

You answered with insults, not evidence. You called everything “lies,” yet you never addressed Ghadir, Khaybar, Karbala, or any of the historical points I raised. Instead, you chose profanity and insults toward Shias, Iraqis, and Ahl al-Bayt.

As for saying Iran will become “Shia-free,” history doesn’t change because of slogans or wishes. People follow what they sincerely believe to be the truth, and no amount of hatred can erase that.

I leave the judgment to Allah. May Allah guide us both to the truth, soften our hearts, protect us from arrogance and hatred, and grant us the humility to accept the truth wherever it is.

والسلام.

[𝓗𝓐𝓑𝓔𝓔𝓑 🇮🇶 @ha_b0520]

You keep saying “lies,” yet you still haven’t refuted a single historical point with evidence. You just repeat insults.

No one is forced to become Shia. Every year, people from Sunni, Christian, atheist, and other backgrounds study early Islamic history for themselves and choose Shi’ism because they become convinced by the evidence. You may disagree with their conclusion, but you can’t pretend they all converted because someone forced them.

As for those born Shia, we’re encouraged to study our beliefs, question them, and strengthen them through knowledge—not blind imitation. If Shi’ism were built on lies, it wouldn’t survive scrutiny after 1,400 years.

The irony is that instead of discussing Ghadir Khumm, Karbala, or the historical sources, you’ve spent this conversation insulting Shias, Iraqis, and even the family of the Prophet ﷺ. That isn’t how someone confident in the truth behaves.

Truth doesn’t fear questions. It doesn’t need profanity, racism, or insults to defend itself. If you have historical evidence, present it. If all you have is “Shia lies,” then you’ve already admitted you can’t answer the actual arguments.

[𝓗𝓐𝓑𝓔𝓔𝓑 🇮🇶 @ha_b0520]

The difference is simple: you’re using insults, while I’m using history.

You claim Shias insult everyone, yet Grand Ayatollah Sayyid Ali al-Sistani and many other Shia scholars have repeatedly forbidden insulting the wives of the Prophet (pbut) or revered Sunni figures because it only spreads hatred. If some individuals do it, they are acting against the guidance of our highest scholars—not representing Shi’ism.

As for Imam Ali, your claim that he was “just a soldier” ignores both history and the Prophet’s own words. At Ghadir Khumm, the Prophet publicly declared: “Whoever has me as his mawla, Ali is his mawla.” Shias understand this as the Prophet appointing Ali as his successor. After the Prophet’s death, events unfolded differently, and that disagreement is one of the central historical differences between Sunnis and Shias.

You mock Imam Ali’s leadership, yet this is the same Ali who carried the banner at Khaybar after others had failed. The Prophet said he would give the banner to “a man who loves Allah and His Messenger, and Allah and His Messenger love him,” and Ali led the victory. Calling him “just a soldier” ignores one of the most famous events in early Islamic history.

Regarding Aisha, Shia scholars differ with some of her political decisions—especially her role in the Battle of the Camel against Imam Ali—but disagreement with her actions does not justify insulting her. Criticizing a historical decision is different from abusing someone’s honor.

You’ve spent this entire discussion calling people names and insulting Ahl al-Bayt. If your position were based on evidence, you wouldn’t need profanity or personal attacks. History deserves evidence, not arrogance.

[𝓗𝓐𝓑𝓔𝓔𝓑 🇮🇶 @ha_b0520]

You know you’ve lost the argument when you stop talking about history and start talking about my nationality.

“I’m Iranian, you Iraqis are our shoes.” Seriously? That’s not an argument—it’s arrogance. Your passport doesn’t make your opinion a historical fact.

Then you claim Imam Ali and Imam Husayn were “bad” and “made dumb mistakes.” Imagine having the arrogance to think you know better than the men whom the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) praised, loved, and entrusted. Imam Ali was one of the greatest companions of the Prophet, and Imam Husayn gave his life rather than legitimize tyranny. Whether you’re Shia or Sunni, they are among the most honored figures in Islam.

You haven’t quoted a single historical source. All you’ve done is insult Iraqis, insult Shias, and insult Ahl al-Bayt because you couldn’t answer the facts.

History doesn’t remember Imam Ali and Imam Husayn as failures. It remembers them as symbols of justice, courage, and sacrifice. The only thing your comments demonstrate is that arrogance is much easier than evidence.

[𝓗𝓐𝓑𝓔𝓔𝓑 🇮🇶 @ha_b0520]

You’re lying about history.

The people who killed Imam Husayn were the army of Yazid, led by Umar ibn Sa’d under the orders of Ubayd Allah ibn Ziyad. That’s a documented historical fact. Claiming “the Shias killed Husayn” is a distortion of history. The people of Kufa who abandoned him after being terrorized by Ibn Ziyad are not the same as saying “Shias killed him.”

And calling Imam Husayn’s stand “a dumb mistake” is insulting the beloved grandson of Prophet Muhammad . Husayn refused to legitimize the rule of Yazid because he believed it violated the principles of Islam. He chose martyrdom over allegiance to tyranny.

As for Ashura, yes, Muslims commemorate Allah saving Prophet Musa (Moses). But pretending that this somehow erases the massacre of the Prophet’s own grandson at Karbala is another attempt to rewrite history.

Stop repeating sectarian propaganda and read the historical sources instead of slogans.

[𝓗𝓐𝓑𝓔𝓔𝓑 🇮🇶 @ha_b0520]

الخبر مضبوط وصحيح

مصادر: جماعات جديدة تتبع مباشرة للحرس الثوري الإيراني وتتجاوز شبكات الفصائل القائمة
مسؤولون عراقيون: الجماعات الجديدة نفذت هجمات بطائرات مسيرة ضد الكويت والسعودية والإمارات.
رئيس الوزراء العراقي الجديد (الزيدي): يدين الهجمات ويتعهد بإجراء تحقيق مشترك مع دول الخليج.
إيران: الدعم المقدم لـ "جماعات المقاومة" ليس محلاً للنقاش.
19 يونيو (رويترز) - أفادت ثمانية مصادر عراقية لـ "رويترز" بأن الحرس الثوري الإيراني أنشأ خلايا سرية جديدة في العراق لشن هجمات على دول خليجية تستضيف قوات أمريكية، متجاوزاً شبكات الفصائل المسلحة المعروفة بهدف تجنب رصدها.
وقالت ثلاثة من هذه المصادر إن ثلاث أو أربع خلايا، تضم كل منها نحو 10 من مقاتلي النخبة الشيعة العراقيين، شنت سبع هجمات على الأقل بطائرات مسيرة بين 20 أبريل و17 مايو. وأضافت المصادر أن الهجمات انطلقت من مواقع صحراوية قريبة من مدينتي البصرة والسماوة الجنوبيتين، واستهدفت مواقع في الكويت والمملكة العربية السعودية والإمارات العربية المتحدة

[𝓗𝓐𝓑𝓔𝓔𝓑 🇮🇶 @ha_b0520]

رفع العقوبات ؟
بقاء البرنامج الصاروخي ؟
اعادة اعمار من قبلكم ؟
انسحاب حماتكم ؟
تصدير النفط ؟
انتعاش اقتصادي قادم ؟

والقادة كلهم يتبدلون بنفس اللحظة الي يستشهدون ببديل يمكل مسيرته على اكمل وجه.
وثاني شي همة بالاساس رايدين الشهادة واحد واحد وتكدر تتأكد انه همة بنفسهم يتمنوها من السيد علي خامنائي الى اصغر جندي استشهد دفاعاً عن ارضه.

وانتوا شوفوا ال ٣٠٠ مليار دولار منين تدبروها وتجمعوها …

ترليونات لامريكا
مليارات لايران
وبعدين لاسرائيل
والقادم اتعس عليكم

[𝓗𝓐𝓑𝓔𝓔𝓑 🇮🇶 @ha_b0520]

القضية أعمق بكثير من مجرد سلاح منتشر هنا وهناك؛ الأزمة الحقيقية تكمن في مركز القرار.

دائماً ما يُطرح موضوع نزع سلاح الفصائل في العراق على اعتبار أن قرار هذه الجماعات عراقي بحت، لكن المتابع البسيط يدرك جيداً أن بوصلتها الاستراتيجية مرتبطة بحسابات "إقليمية" أوسع بكثير.

بمعنى آخر، أي خطوة فعلية لإنهاء فوضى السلاح لن تُحسم في بغداد وحدها، فالأمر مرهون بتفاهمات وتقاطعات مع القوى الإقليمية التي تقف خلف هذه الفصائل.
لو اقتضت المصلحة الإقليمية التهدئة، سنجد أنفسنا أمام عملية اندماج سلسة وتراجع ملحوظ للعمل المسلح. أما في غياب هذا "الضوء الأخضر" فأي محاولة ضغط محلية ستصطدم بجدار صلب، ببساطة لأن نفوذ هذه الفصائل وتغلغلها في مفاصل الدولة الأمنية والسياسية طوال السنوات الماضية أصبح أمراً واقعاً يصعب تجاوزه.

لذا ربما علينا التوقف عن سؤال: "كيف سننزع السلاح؟"
ونبدأ بطرح السؤال الأهم: "أين يُتخذ القرار الذي يسمح أصلاً بنزع هذا السلاح؟".

Lt. Habeeb

[𝓗𝓐𝓑𝓔𝓔𝓑 🇮🇶 @ha_b0520]

@mog_Russ @grok @grok

[𝓗𝓐𝓑𝓔𝓔𝓑 🇮🇶 @ha_b0520]

@mog_Russ @grok ماهي صحة الخبر ومدى تكتم الاعلام الغربي ؟ وهل هي اف ١٥ ام ٣٥ لايتننغ ٢؟