Alexander Solzhenitsyn gave the most controversial speech *against* Western Civilization at Harvard in 1978.
As a survivor of the Russian Gulags, they expected him to praise the West. Instead, he made a jarring accusation:
The West is a dying civilization. If it doesn't change its ways, it is doomed to collapse.
In fact, he said this has been the case for 500 years, when the West made a crucial mistake:
"How did the West decline from its triumphal march to its present debility?
...the mistake must be at the root, at the very foundation of thought in modern times. I refer to the prevailing Western view of the world which was born in the Renaissance…
I refer to humanism — the proclaimed autonomy of man from any higher force above him."
Solzhenitsyn said humanism made man autonomous from God, Truth, and objective morality.
If all morality is subjective, then man has nothing to live nor die for. Naturally, he loses his courage, embraces materialism, and grows effeminate to modern evils.
So, what is the solution?
A return to belief in a transcendental morality under God:
"If, as claimed by humanism, man were born only to be happy, he would not be born to die. Since his body is doomed to death, his task on earth evidently must be more spiritual…
The fulfillment of a permanent, earnest duty so that one’s life journey may become above all an experience of moral growth: to leave life a better human being than one started it."
All cultures live, or die, based on their respect of the True, Good, and Beautiful.
To save the West, Solzhenitsyn says start with beautifying your soul, for that is both how you live well, and begin to make civilization itself beautiful again.
Men like Rupert Lowe are the leaders the West needs: clear-eyed, unafraid, and decisive.
These invaders will learn that remigration is one option, but not the only one available to them.
Crimes like those detailed below will be met swiftly and without mercy.
“I do not believe that Europeans, upon learning that they are in danger, will allow themselves to be displaced. The past has shown that historic awakenings occur very slowly, but once they have begun, nothing can stop them.”
- Dominique Venner
“What is falling, we should also push.”
— Friedrich Nietzsche, Thus Spoke Zarathustra
When Oswald Spengler wrote of the “decline of the West,” he was describing a vast historical process which has now reached its final stages. Even at this late hour, few possess the moral or intellectual fortitude required to grasp the full extent of that decline. What confronts us is not merely a political order grown corrupt or inefficient, but the degeneration of an entire civilization. Every major institution of Western society bears the unmistakable marks of decay. Social, economic, religious, cultural, and political forms alike have been hollowed and rotted out from within.
Not since the final centuries of imperial Rome has the world witnessed a collapse of comparable magnitude. Here we find the businessman, whose god is Mammon; the politician, who prostitutes himself in parliamentary brothels; the preacher who admonishes one to worship alien gods while proclaiming the evils of race; the teacher, who advocates feminism and homosexuality as an alternate lifestyle; the military officer, who is more concerned about his retirement benefits than his honor as a soldier—as well as the ordinary citizen who, sated with beer and TV, accepts it all with hardly a peep of protest. All of these are symptomatic of a disease, a cancer, a terminal illness which has condemned existing civilization to death.
According to the great cyclic law governing the rise and fall of cultures, Western civilization as an organic entity is finished. No recovery is possible. There is no meaningful sense in which it can be saved, nor should such an attempt be made. What has become decadent should not be preserved; it must be broken.
Modern Western civilization has become a grotesque parody of genuine culture, a hollow imitation drained of substance and meaning. Its values are false and alien, anti-natural, anti-racial, and thus hostile to life itself. What we are witnessing is the final phase of organic deterioration, a process that will run its course and end in collapse and chaos. Nothing can halt it.
Faced with this prospect, one must ask how a man is to respond to the impending death of a civilization in which he was born and formed. Does one retreat into self-hedonistic indulgence or nihilistic despair? Does one abandon reason in favor of comforting illusions, whether religious or ideological? Or does one deny reality altogether and cling to nostalgia for what has been irretrievably lost?
The decisive question, then, imposes itself with unavoidable force. Does the death of a culture mark the end of all purpose? Does it signal the extinction of meaning itself, leaving existence emptied of direction and necessity?
For us, there is only one answer. Action, clear-eyed and disciplined, imposed upon chaos without illusion or restraint.
And here, the first important consideration is that our worldview has never regarded culture as determinative. Rather, it upholds the primacy of race and recognizes in the racial principle the potential source of all higher culture. The immediate corollary of this outlook, of course, is that the death of a civilization is not of the same order as the death of a race.
Here the question of preservation assumes its highest importance. Who will endure the coming collapse? What will emerge in the aftermath of Western dissolution? These are not speculative concerns. They are questions of survival. What is at stake is the preservation of a viable racial nucleus capable of carrying history forward beyond the ruins of the present order.
And in order for the nucleus not merely to survive, but to endure as a historical force, it must disengage itself from the chaotic degeneracy that surrounds it. It goes without saying that any attempt by the White race to separate itself from the general decadence of Western civilization is fraught with danger. For more than a millennium, the destiny of White man has been bound to the history of the West in an inseparable manner. Whether he can withstand the shock of cultural disengagement remains uncertain. Yet the undertaking must be attempted, for there is no other path forward.
Unless our race, or at least a viable segment of it, can through conscious effort detach itself from the disintegrating cultural mass, it will be overwhelmed along with it. Only through the creation of a New Order, arising consciously from the ruins of an Old Order that is exhausted and beyond recovery, can there be any future worthy of the name for White man.
What is crucial is not whether a decadent civilization survives, but whether a race capable of culture endures. For what is at stake is not the life of a civilization as such, but the eternal life of a people capable of the highest culture. That is the real issue of our time.
As long as the White man exists, he will bear within him the Promethean spark which cataclysmic tragedy can only serve to fan into a bright new flame of creative expression. And just as contemporary Western culture freely adapted elements of the preceding Classical period into its historic fabric, so will it be with the post-Western culture of the New Order as it appropriates as a timeless legacy those features of the West which have remained worthy and undefiled.
Ted Kaczynski was right. We think of him as a "schizo extremist", but his philosophy predicted the response to the Epstein files — nothing.
The Epstein files makes it clear: everyone in the government are traitors; they're all "in on it".
So, why does no one overthrow the tyrants, like our ancestors overthrew the British during Revolutionary War?
Ted Kaczynski claims that:
"Several hundred years ago, violence was not considered immoral in European society. In fact, under suitable conditions, it was admired. The most prestigious social class was the nobility, which was then a warrior caste."
The Western world was once defined by hierarchy, rule of great men who organized the lesser in accordance with God’s will. The ideal of Empire propelled us to dominate the world. The warrior held the most valuable position in the hierarchy, as his force was necessary to conquer and maintain the law decreed by the higher.
Now the “man of action” is spat upon, anyone who remotely suggests organization is quickly labeled a “fed poster” and singled out for elimination. Why? What caused this shift?
With traditional, Aryan hierarchy abandoned, technological progress has become our organizational principle. This was, however, not always the case.
Progress was "held in check" by tradition until the 1700s, when:
The "French Revolution [lead to the] disappearance of religious and social taboos [and replaced them with] materialism, the suppression of the various hierarchies, regicide, and the struggle against the clergy”.
Modern civilization may appear to be “collapsing”, but it is rather being molded to “smooth out” any differentiation that may impede technological expansion. Progress is the force of inversion in itself that mandates everything degenerate into a lowest, collective, indistinguishable sameness.
The will of technology is to expand as efficiently as possible; it organizes civilization in such a way that barriers to its expansion are rapidly eliminated — this means the total deletion of unique expressions of identity.
The “efficiency principle” functions as follows:
"In addition to suppressing racial, ethnic, religious, and other group hostilities, it also has to suppress or harness for its own advantage all other tendencies that could lead to disruption or disorder, such as machismo, aggressive impulses, and any inclination to violence”.
All cogs in the machine must function at maximum optimality at all times to quicken advancement. Individual expressions of uniqueness become impediments to progress. Therefore, all must become the same. All must become normalized, standardized, stripped of any hindrance.
Culture is first targeted and destroyed. The time required to produce beautiful works and architecture is the first to go. We don't need quality. We need quantity. We demand simple, mass production to expand the urban environment as quickly as possible.
Families are ripped up from the wilds and quickly filed one by one into concrete honeycomb towers to forever remain.
This process of coaxing members into urbanized environments and removing them from folk practices has caused a crisis of skill.
We literally forgot how to rebel against the system, after generations of urban and suburban life. We cannot remotely fathom how to revive, let alone value, American folk practices related to frontier life — homesteading, self-production of food and resources, hunting, trapping, etc.
The Americans were able to win the Revolutionary War because of our frontiersman culture. Our people fought perfectly integrated with nature and supplied one another with goods produced by our folk.
We maintained a rugged, self-sufficient population and an ascetic warrior culture across generations in such a way that most everyone was both ready and capable enough to fight “at any minute”.
Rebellion today is impossible; we are completely reliant upon the system for all goods, income, defense, etc. The list of our needs is endless and eternal. It makes no difference that we “notice” the chains around our necks and the Satanic pedophiles who whip us.
We have no skill, no virtue, no ability to fight. Rather, we are happy to be slaves, so long as we have access to an unlimited amount of “goyslop” to distract us.
Even we revolutionary types are too useless to act. In our profound stupidity, we "high IQ" members confuse the act of “noticing” our chains with rebellion in itself. In fact, we're "noticing" ourselves to death.
To pretend that knowledge alone constitutes an authentic revolutionary act against "the system" shows how useless we've become.
We lack the skill to engage authentic acts of resistance. We lack the will to go beyond our prison. Worse, we rationalizes the prison as our home, our most holy value. Surely, we believe, someone more powerful will save us, will come to our aide in our time of need. So, we go out triumphantly and vote, consenting to continue our demise.
Until we are able to overcome materialist fixation and our authentic belief that the slave system is a value we will continue to lose and rationalize passivity as an ideal.
The White man built and sustains the gloriousness of Western civilization, yet they claim our only options are replacement by a resentful slave class from below and domination by a predatory alien caste from above. There is a third option. We take back what’s ours.
We’ve seen how these elections go.
We’ve seen what we get out of them.
We’ve seen who owns all our politicians.
Anyone still doing partisan politics or telling you how important elections are is the definition of goycattle
“Now that all the Western empires are gone, Western Man, relieved of his duty to civilize and Christianize mankind, reveling in luxury in our age of self-indulgence, seems to have lost his will to live and reconciled himself to his impending death.”
Pat Buchanan
I am completely convinced that Trump has no intentions to do anything at all to help the country.
He's protecting the deep state, working for Israel, leading the collapse of the Republican party, and kicking the hornets nest everywhere to sew chaos and division.
What is Trump's new plan for the 50 million illegals in the United States?
He has backtracked on mass deportations.
He changed his philosophy to only going after "criminals." (Note: they are all criminals).
He just threw ICE under the bus publicly.
What is the plan?
Every time a talking head opens his mouth, it’s a reminder of exactly what we’re up against: lies piled upon lies, and treason most foul.
“When we win, do not forget that these people want you broke, dead, your kids raped and brainwashed, and they think it’s funny.”
—Sam Hyde
The depth psychologist Carl Jung, possibly as early as the 1920s, based on a trip he made to America, predicted that American whites would eventually be unable to resist the heavy downward pull of the primitive life of blacks.
Jung predicted that whites would eventually "go black":
"What is more contagious than to live side by side with a rather primitive people? Go to Africa and see what happens. When it is so obvious that you stumble over it, you call it going black...
"The inferior man has a tremendous pull because he fascinates the inferior layers of our psyche, which has lived through untold ages of similar conditions...
"Blacks remind us not so much of our conscious as our unconscious mind—not only of childhood but of prehistory."
What Jung could not foresee at the time was that American culture would later celebrate integration as its greatest moral triumph and encourage whites to "go black" as proof that integration was succeeding, that America was the exceptional nation that had perfected its liberal constitution—creating, as Obama put it, a "post-racial" culture in which, as Michael Jackson sang, "it don't matter if you're black or white," since whites now behave like blacks.
Anyone not demanding remigration is condemning their kids to being a hated minority with nowhere to run.
I don’t know how a parent could hate their children that much.
Evil is inexplicable.
“The martyrs of the last times will be the greatest of all, for the first fought against the Emperors, but the last will battle with Satan.”
– St. Augustine
Why isn’t ICE operating in friendly red states to clean out the massive illegal problem in states like Texas instead of sending half their field agents to clash with libtards in Minnesota?
The answer is because this government isn’t actually interested in deporting people