Most companies find out about a breach 194 days too late.
HackCheck customers find out in 4 minutes.
$374K in breach costs avoided. The math speaks for itself.
https://t.co/1sFNxntYuZ
@BleepinComputer 200 flaws. 33 critical. 6 zero-days. One Patch Tuesday. Patching is reactive by definition: the window between disclosure and exploitation keeps shrinking. Know what’s exposed before the next one drops.
@BleepinComputer GitHub finally moving on npm supply chain security. Good step. But policy changes don't retroactively clean up the credentials already stolen from compromised packages.
@TheHackersNews Actively exploited Exchange flaw, now patched. Exchange 2016, 2019, SE all affected. If you’re still running on-prem Exchange and haven’t patched: your credentials are already at risk
@BleepinComputer The Miasma source code just hit GitHub. Every copycat now has a blueprint for stealing CI/CD credentials and poisoning repos. This one’s going to get worse before it gets better.
@BleepinComputer ShinyHunters going after PeopleSoft: HR data, payroll, employee records. When the extortion gang has your people data, the credential exposure follows. It’s all connected.
Most companies find out about a breach weeks after it happens. By then, the damage is done.
HackCheck surfaces threats the moment credentials hit a breach database, stealer log, or dark web channel before attackers can use them.
Check your exposure at https://t.co/1sFNxntYuZ
@TheHackersNews OpenAI adding Lockdown Mode to block data exfiltration via AI tools. The fact that this feature needs to exist tells you everything about how attackers are using AI right now
@haveibeenpwned 1,000 breaches in HIBP. That’s not a milestone: that’s a pattern. 103k corporate emails from Baker Distributing just dropped on ShinyHunters’ pay-or-leak site. Half were already in the database.
@BleepinComputer Law firms are a goldmine: privileged comms, client financials, M&A data. Fake IT support call gets an employee to hand over credentials willingly. No malware needed.
@IntCyberDigest@nattyfried A username is all it takes to pull someone’s email and phone number from Meta’s recovery flow. No auth required. This isn’t a sophisticated attack: it’s a design failure.
@TheHackersNews Zero interaction, full privilege escalation, already being exploited. Patching is reactive by definition—by the time it’s public, someone’s already been hit.
@IntCyberDigest 57 packages, 286 malicious versions, under 2 hours. GitHub secrets, cloud creds, SSH keys, password managers—all gone before anyone noticed. The pipeline is the new perimeter.
@TheHackersNews Stolen hash, no crack needed—just lateral movement across your whole network. And it’s still unpatched. Credentials don’t have to be cracked to be weaponized.
@AikidoSecurity 30+ packages, malicious binary on preinstall. This is exactly why credential monitoring can’t stop at the perimeter - stealer logs catch what the supply chain drops.
@elhackernet@H4ckmanac A 16-year-old leaked data from Spain’s Attorney General and National Security. If a teenager can do it, imagine what a motivated threat actor can.
@CyberScoopNews A Google security engineer used internal data to bet on a prediction market. The most dangerous credential isn’t the one that got stolen: it’s the one being misused right now.