@Grady_Booch@CatRosu@unclebobmartin@AlbertoBasalo For what it's worth, I also don't see the "mob" that Bob constantly refers to. I see a profession working vigorously to protect its integrity. There are some topics for which we, as a profession, have to be willing to stand on. Even if it's not comfortable.
@AlcesBull I always found a great deal of value in Real Options as positioned by Chris Matts: https://t.co/lwcUpbANQM
Also, Impact Mapping as a way to think about the outcome first: https://t.co/NwgBuSd4nX
Might be a great companion guides to your DM:)
@AlcesBull Or, be specific about what it means to be a leader? Not all employees want the responsibility that falls within these boundaries. And, to some extent, could be an unfair expectation. I think there's a big difference between being enabled and being a leader.
@johncutlefish I think it comes down to your appetite for mistakes. If you're willing to "learn as you go", then yes. When pushed, it's hard to be open to learning as you go. Without experience, it's hard to answer the hard executive questions. Creates doubt. Most not willing to risk their jobs
@gregyoung Personally, I might first do one with HIGH interaction, fewer attendees, capture that as a "prepared" session, and maybe offer that as a lower-cost second option. Less interaction on the second. Maybe just "email me" or https://t.co/2ZGmzp4wHO type of thing.
@AlcesBull We see a fair amount of this as well. We've developed a heuristic to keep the relationship in balance. Which is, the second I care more about this focus/goal/change than you do, then we need to re-evaluate the importance of said focus/goal/change. Keeps it honest at least.
@AlcesBull Phenomenal conversation. Not only a more attainable goal, but often far more profitable. The longer I'm at this myself, the more value, and interest, I find in the "unsexy" aspects of business. Definitely unappreciated by many in the current culture.