prolétaire intellectuel leader d'opinion.
Film scholar, British cinema, classical Hollywood, melodrama and stuff!
Also on buesky: @drhadrienf2.bsky.social
Afin de mettre d'ordre dans mes affaires, et pour quelques hypothétiques âmes perdus que mes divagations littéraro-cinématographiques intéressent, voici le thread de mes threads.
@richard_maurhut@epchapman1986 but the only big non-academic movie critic I can stand is Bazin so I'm not really the best judge of that kind of literature 😅
More seriously any artist can be criticized but it takes more than just calling them "middlebrow"...
@richard_maurhut@epchapman1986 I am not familiar with this particular critic by Skorecki. Knowing I am not surprised that he judged Scorsese harshly. I don't care much for the kind of cantankerous ejaculation Skorecki was know for. Although he was a real thinker he often annoys me (even when I agree)
@richard_maurhut@epchapman1986 And I think both Bergman and Scorsese are brilliant artist of the highest order, the fact Scorsese is also a popular filmmaker makes it all the more admirable.
@richard_maurhut@epchapman1986 But that says nothing about their respective artistic worth (and let's be clear this is all this discussion is about, OP used middlebrow as a disqualifying term, that's what people are protesting against). It's screen between us and the work itself .
@elladorn_@QuicksilverClay Oh? you realized that alone, all by yourself? A significant progress!!! Yes "middlebrow" isn't really a rigorous term. It doesn't really have a stable significant because it's just a set of implied values you can used to pass Judgement without having to really argue your point.
@QuicksilverClay@elladorn_ Most of Bergman's films are middlebrow. Most of what we call arthouse films are middlebrow, very few are actual avant garde, experimental/really hermetic work. It doesn't say much about their artistic quality. Using "middlebrow" as a term of dismissal like OP is rather idiotic.
perfect, though almost tbh, but shot for shot and cut to cut his style is so obviously his own and so frequently copied by lesser artists that its power can be forgotten, which is one of the hallmarks of a great artist. Like Bergman. AI is causing an unfortunate new moralism,/
Not only is he as “singular” as Bergman, through his work in film restoration and advocating for international cinema he is also easily the most influential American director seriously trying to help create a more film literate US public. It’s not to say every single movie is/
Whatever you think abt Scorsese’s decisions, this is the kind of ignorant take we use to justify denigrating wildly important artists. Scorsese is one of the most singular, influential, and stylistically masterful directors in history, “arthouse” and “mainstream” alike./