I am never happy criticizing Islam.
With every post I make, every article I publish, every interview I give, I wrestle within myself. This world is cruel, and it needs more kindness, and it saddens me that I can't contribute more of it.
If Islam were confined to a certain geography, I wouldn’t concern myself with it. If Islam were reformable, if it were possible for an open, high-trust society to survive it, I wouldn’t risk my life or waste my energy discussing this backward, dark ideology.
But the problem is that Islam is none of these things.
Islam is an expansionist ideology that, wherever it exists, erases individual liberties. And with that, it destroys creativity and prosperity.
What we have witnessed in the West since October 7 has been the rebranding of Islam using the lexicon of the left.
It is a moral obligation to stand against its expansion, to educate decision-makers about the threat it poses to the West, and to ensure that the Church, which plays a decisive role in shaping U.S. political direction, is equipped with the right tools and not deceived by false narratives.
Committing to moral obligations is a discipline that brings no earthly pleasure. I find no pleasure in combating Islam.
However, I can't live with myself if I choose to live a quiet, normal life while knowing that I might be able to make a difference, even if I am not very optimistic about the future.
According to the official body representing Muslim police officers in Britain, pointing out that Hamas beheaded and raped people on October 7 makes you Islamophobic.
That's the position laid out in a since-deleted policy paper by the National Association of Muslim Police, which defended Hamas against "unverified stories about acts of violence" and claimed the reports "significantly contributed to increasing hatred towards Islam."
NAMP is affiliated to 16 of Britain's 43 police forces. The College of Policing calls them "an important part of policing" that plays "a crucial role in supporting our workforce."
The same paper, written by NAMP's then vice-president, describes the IDF as a "Zionist terrorist group" and brands Zionism as "one of the manifestations of anti-Muslim hatred."
This is legitimately terrifying.
Zack Polanski, the head of England’s Green Party, was photographed wearing a shirt reading “Free Marwan.”
Marwan Barghouti is in prison for his role in orchestrating multiple terror attacks that killed innocent people.
Leaders of democratic nations must oppose terrorism. That is a baseline that cannot be allowed to change.
Since Andy Burnham wants to be the next Labour leader, here’s a reminder:
Andy accused victims of Pakistani-Muslim grooming gangs of trying to “propagandise” the issue.
He tried to block the grooming gangs inquiry in Manchester and nationally.
He claimed that Pakistani-Muslims grooming gangs are a “thing of the past” despite clear evidence that little girls are still being victimised to this day, including in his local area.
And what does he call the LITTLE GIRLS who were raped under his watch?
Not children.
Not little girls.
“Young women.”
Even on the most basic level, Burnham tried to shift the blame onto victims and refused to acknowledge that they were children.
Countless little girls were raped, exploited and even murdered by Pakistani-Muslim grooming gangs, while powerful men like him turned a blind eye.
Andy Burnham belongs in prison, not Parliament.
And certainly not in 10 Downing Street.
The Somerset Farmhouse of 1 North Street, Williton were approached by a "food influencer" that wanted to charge them £2,000 for a review.
They put out a video of Sally eating a sausage roll instead 😆.
Lets make Sally and the Somerset Farmhouse famous for free.
This is a clip that is so on point it may be very uncomfortable for some to watch. However, the Chinese man featured in the clip is saying out loud what I have written about at length and many academics have articulated.
You’ll have to excuse the captions which struggles with his Chinese accent, but that doesn’t detract from the message.
🎥 TikTok - https://t.co/FvZxHZpe4Z
There is a grotesque double standard at the heart of the Nowak scandal.
Ordinary people are told to trust “the process” and wait patiently for the IOPC, the CPS, the Attorney General — yet Hampshire Police didn’t wait.
They tried to shape the process, in real time, with a trial‑time statement to squash “disinformation” and an early push that there was “no indication of misconduct” by any officers involved.
They even let it be known that Henry had been arrested on suspicion of racially aggravated assault, effectively laundering the murderer’s “wicked lie” through official channels while his victim’s body was barely cold.
Only after the public saw the bodycam footage, only after protests, only after national outrage, did the chief constable shuffle in front of cameras to say he was “deeply sorry” and that the footage was “distressing” — but still insist he won’t resign.
If this is what we see in one high‑profile case, imagine what happens in the dozens that never make the news.
Keeping Boon in post now is not “stability”; it is an endorsement of a police state‑style information machine.
Boon MUST be dismissed immediately.
ISIS terrorists caught laughing and mocking a Yazidi girl as she’s brutally raped in the background, her screams of suffering completely ignored.
They call us “devil worshippers,” so raping Yazidi women and girls isn’t just allowed; it’s a religious duty in their twisted ideology.
This is pure, demonic evil.
@BritIndianVoice Existing laws ban knives. The faith loophole is a joke and must be closed. You don't see Englishmen carrying the saex so why should immigrants be armed?
2014. Mosul, Iraq.
ISIS ties up 19 Yazidi girls and burns them alive in public.
Their crime? They dared to say NO, no to converting to Islam, no to becoming sex slaves for the terrorists.
Hundreds of local Iraqis stood there watching the flames devour them.
No horror. No sadness. Just smiles, cheers, and celebration.
They welcomed ISIS like heroes.
This is the Yazidi Genocide in its ugliest truth: not hidden in the shadows, but carried out in broad daylight while the crowd applauded.
The world looked away then.
We refuse to look away now.
This cop raped a 7 year old girl 3 times a week for 8 years.
He;
Threatened witnesses.
Pestered a 14 year old girl.
Abused another child and turned up drunk for work.
We all know who David Carrick is but no one knows who Mohammed Younis is?
Two Tier MSM?
https://t.co/oU2xLs7qam
Even Arab leaders admit it.
Everyone is sharing the Bill Clinton clip where he describes how Yasser Arafat rejected a generous peace offer at Camp David that would have given the Palestinians a state on 96 percent of the West Bank, land swaps, and a capital in East Jerusalem. Clinton says Arafat lied to him and that the Palestinian leadership never actually wanted a two-state solution. They wanted to destroy Israel. It’s a video often shared by people like @VividProwess, and it’s an important one for people to see.
Of course, critics immediately dismiss it. They claim Clinton is biased or he’s pro-Israel. They’ll tell you that you cannot trust the American perspective.
Ok, so let us set that aside.
Now watch this.
In this powerful interview, former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, a major Arab leader who was directly involved in negotiations, says exactly the same thing from the Arab side. He talks about the Mena House Conference in Cairo as well as the Camp David negotiations of 1978. All failed because of the Palestinians repeatedly rejecting any offer. The Oslo accords were signed but because Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad were not involved, they derailed the accords and any chance for peace by initiating 4 years of terrorist suicide attacks in Israel. Then came the second Camp David negotiations in 2000 which Arafat agreed to, then rejected and instead initiated the Second Intifada.
Mubarak explains how the Palestinians refused to even participate in the Mena House conference of 1977. He describes repeated opportunities they were given, including a detailed document that called for Israeli withdrawal from the Samaria, Judea and Gaza, security arrangements during a transitional period, and other major concessions. The Israelis were willing to negotiate on difficult issues like who would control security. The Palestinians, according to Mubarak, kept saying no and wasting chance after chance.
He speaks with clear frustration about how for decades the Palestinian side has rejected peace initiatives and realistic compromises.
The video further shows footage from the PLO representative in 1977, as well as old footage of Egyptian president Sadat who was involved in the Mena House and first Camp David negotiations of 1978.
This perhaps is far more impactful than Clinton’s account because it is not a Western or Israeli voice. It is prominent Arab leaders who lived the negotiations, who represented the broader Arab world, and who had zero incentive to defend Israel.
When leaders from both sides of the table describe the same pattern of Palestinian rejectionism and violence, it becomes much harder to dismiss as bias.
The pattern is clear across decades and across different voices… generous offers, repeated refusals, and continued demands for everything while giving nothing in return.
This is not ancient history. It is the core reason the conflict continues today.
If you value the truth, please share.