Ageng Priambada

[BITMART SCAM @bitmart_scam]

🚨 NEW ON-CHAIN FINDINGS ABOUT BITMART — WHERE IS OUR MONEY?

While BitMart users are still unable to withdraw their own funds, on-chain investigators continue tracing large transfers from wallets attributed to BitMart that took place before withdrawals were effectively shut down.

According to the published on-chain analysis:

~31.51M USDT on BSC

Destination address:
0x86dbf9ca4e14709668880f2a25590fc9d700370f

The analysis reportedly counted only transfers of $100,000 or more between April and July 2026.

~41.9M USDT on Ethereum

Sender:
0x2982bB64bcd07Ac3315C32Cb2BB7e5E8a2De7d67

Destination:
0x86dbf9ca4e14709668880f2a25590fc9d700370f

That is approximately $73.41 MILLION USDT across BSC and Ethereum alone.

Another ~14.2M USDT reportedly moved through TRC20:

TQsZjoDzJqZgnpmBKNqJaYWGWjs4ZkpnX

According to the published analysis, this address recorded 66 transactions totaling approximately 14.2M USDT between April 2 and July 24.

Investigators also say that SOL, AVAX, ARB and other networks are still being analyzed.

And after all of this, Sheldon says there is no money?

On-chain investigators are reporting tens of millions of USDT transferred from wallets attributed to BitMart before withdrawals were effectively shut down.

Meanwhile, BitMart users cannot access their own money. People cannot withdraw even $1.

So where did these tens of millions go?

Who controlled the destination accounts and addresses? Why were such enormous amounts being transferred shortly before users lost access to their funds?

In my view, what is happening looks less and less like a simple “delay” or technical issue. It looks like assets continue to be moved through different wallets, companies and structures while users remain locked out and unable to withdraw their own money.

If these funds belong to customers, an even more serious question needs to be answered: why are they being moved instead of returned to their owners? And will there be anything left to recover by the time users are finally able to enforce their claims?

If these transfers were legitimate asset consolidation, then @BitMartExchange and @sheldonbitmart should publish the complete wallet list, transaction history, all related entities, customer liabilities, and independently verified Proof of Reserves.

If everything is legitimate and the money has not disappeared, prove it on-chain.

We don't need another announcement about a future announcement. We don't need another form.

Show the money. Show the wallets. Show the related companies. Show the liabilities. Explain the transfers.

Almost two months later, people still cannot access their own funds.

Until BitMart provides a transparent and independently verifiable explanation for these transfers, one question remains:

WHERE IS OUR MONEY, SHELDON?

@BitMartExchange @sheldonbitmart @cz_binance @star_okx

#BitMart #USDT #Crypto #Binance #CryptoNews

[BITMART SCAM @bitmart_scam]

❓️What the fuck is going on here?

People have been unable to withdraw their own money for almost two months, and you spent an entire fucking week preparing an “update” just to give us a new button to submit another form?

Seriously, Sheldon? This is your action plan? Another form, another portal, another way to buy more time?

We don’t need another button. We don’t need another “feedback portal.” You already know exactly what the problem is: people cannot withdraw their money.

Enable withdrawals. Return users’ funds. Publish verifiable information showing where customer assets are and give us a concrete timeline for when they will be returned.

Enough forms. Enough promises. WHERE IS THE MONEY?

[Ageng Priambada @haetfazfer]

@lil_mae231 -4

[Ageng Priambada @haetfazfer]

@farman4x -5

[Ageng Priambada @haetfazfer]

@Astro_Boy020 Gak ribet, yg salah ya yg nyenggol. Mau pelari main hp kek main leptop kek main pc sambil lari bodo amat, yg jelas yg melakukan aksi merugikan yg nabrak, toh si pelari gak lari ditengah jalan. Mau pelari marah atau nggak tanggung jawab itu obyektif, mana yg rugi harus ditutup.

[Ageng Priambada @haetfazfer]

@BitMart_zh We are waiting for the announcement that makes another announcement? How is this a joke?

[Joe’s Crypto @Joes__Crypto]

BitMart，请先回答一个最基本的问题：

为什么用户突然变成了“债权人”？

BitMart 在最新的“重组”公告中明确使用了：

“distributions to creditors”——向债权人进行分配。

很多普通用户可能不知道，“用户”和“债权人”这两个词，在重组语境下完全不是一回事。

如果你是“用户”，平台托管的是你的资产，你要求的是���

返还属于你自己的资产。

但如果你被放进“债权人”的框架，事情就可能变成：

平台欠你一笔债，你需要进入重组程序等待确认、排序和分配。

这两者的法律性质，可能天差地别。

而最讽刺的是——

BitMart 自己的 User Agreement 第 2.7.1 条写得清清楚楚：

用户 Digital Asset Wallet 内资产的所有权始终属于用户，不会转移给 BitMart；

BitMart 为用户持有的数字资产不是 BitMart 的财产；

甚至明确写明，这些资产不应受到 BitMart 债权人的索赔。

那么现在问题来了：

既然这些资产从来不是 BitMart 的财产，为什么今天用户反而被放进了“creditors（债权人）”的分配框架？

我们存进去的是自己的 USDT、BTC、ETH。

不是借钱给 BitMart。

不是买 BitMart 的债券。

更没有任何用户同意把自己的资产变成 BitMart 的融资。

所以请 BitMart 在 9 月 9 日的 roadmap 中正面回答：

你们所谓的“creditors”到底包括哪些人？是否包括普通平台用户？
如果包括，BitMart 凭什么把用户资产定义成对平台的“债权”？
BitMart 是否认为用户现在只是普通无担保债权人？
如果是，请公开具体法律依据，并解释这与 BitMart 自己 User Agreement 第 2.7.1 条如何不矛盾。
如果不是，那么请停止模糊措辞，直接说明：

用户账户里的资产是否仍然100%属于用户本人？

如果答案是“是”，那就更简单了：

属于用户的资产，就应该返还用户。

不要一边在 User Agreement 里告诉所有人：

“资产属于你。”

等到无法正常提款、开始谈重组的时候，又突然告诉大家：

“你是债权人，等我们分配。”

这不是一个文字游戏。

这关系到所有 BitMart 用户最后究竟是在取回自己的资产，还是在等待一家公司的债务重组分配。

9 月 9 日，我们等的不是下一篇公关稿。

我们要的是答案：

我们的资产，究竟还是不是我们的？

@sheldonbitmart
@BitMartExchange
@BitMart_zh
@JackClawAI
#BitMart

https://t.co/gxNvb6KW4u

[Ageng Priambada @haetfazfer]

@sheldonbitmart @echobaseglobal @BitMartExchange Where is my money? Please return it, and open the transparency

[Joe’s Crypto @Joes__Crypto]

Sheldon，你既然今天愿意公开回应，那就不要只讲“同一团队”“IP 和设备全部交叉”“获利金额很大”这些结论。

之前用户公开提出的几个核心问题，你��现在其实一个都没有正面回答。

第一，相关交易到底是不是在 BitMart 商务团队知情甚至参与推动的情况下进行的？

你自己今天已经承认：

当时存在“0 滑点补贴活动”，并且“有大量新招的内部 BD 参与”。

既然如此，这件事情就更需要解释清楚。

活动是 BitMart 的，BD 是 BitMart 的，交易发生在 BitMart，使用的也是 BitMart 提供的官方功能。

如果平台认为这种交易模式违规，请直接公布当时适用的具体规则，以及究竟是哪一笔交易违反了哪一条规则。

不能活动期间让 BD 推动用户参与，活动结束以后，再用一句“风控问题”把责任全部推给用户。

第二，你现在公开说“IP 和设备全部交叉”，那就请把证据公布出来。

这个问题最简单，也最好验证。

你既然敢公开说：

“200 多个账号，IP 和设备全部交叉，同属一个团队。”

那就不要只说结论��

请直接公布经过适当脱敏的 IP 记录、设备标��/设备编号、登录时间，以及对应的账号关联关系。

至少让大家能够验证：

哪些账号使用了同一个 IP？

具体什么时间登录？

哪些账号使用了同一台设备？

对应的设备标识/设备编号是什么？

200 多个账号里面到底有多少账号存在你所谓的“IP、设备交叉”？

你说的是“全部交叉”，那就把证据拿出来。

不要一句“风控检测到 IP、设备交叉”就想把 200 多个账号全部打成“同一团队”。

后台数据全部在 BitMart 手上，现在又是你自己主动公开提出这个指控，那举证责任当然在你。

如果涉及用户隐私，可以脱敏。

但账号 A、账号 B、IP 尾段、设备编号脱敏值、登录时间、关联逻辑，这些完全可以整理出来。

拿数据说话。

否则一句“IP 和设备全部交叉”，谁都可以说。

第三，为什么正常使用 BitMart Copy Trading 2.0 的用户会被集体限制？

Copy Trading 2.0 是谁开发和提供的？

BitMart。

带单员是谁审核通过的？

BitMart。

用户使用平台官方提供的跟单功能进行交易，最后却有 200 多个账号被一起限制。

即使你真的能够证明部分账号存在 IP 或设备关联，也请继续回答：

IP 重复违反用户协议哪一条？

设备重复违反用户协议哪一条？

关联账号本身是否等于违规交易？

如果等于，请把当时生效的规则原文拿出来。

不要把：

“存在关联”

直接偷换成：

“资金可以被长期限制”。

这是完全不同的两件事情。

第四，为什么已经完成 KYC 的用户，到现在依然没有明确处理结果？

部分用户按照 BitMart 要求完成了 KYC，最后得到的依然只是：

“继续等待进一步通知。”

所以请直接回答：

完成 KYC 后为什么还是不能处理？

如果 KYC 不是解除限制的条件，当初为什么要求用户完成？

如果还有其他审核条件，就一次性公开说明。

而不是让用户无限期等待。

第五，200 多个账号、70几万 USDT，现在到底准备怎么处理？

这才是用户真正关心的问题。

你今天花了大量篇幅解释：

谁是“同���团队”、谁是“KOL 代表”、谁赚了多少钱、4 月和 7 月是不是同一件事情。

但是最核心的问题你还是没有回答：

钱什么时候处理？

所以请 BitMart 直接回答：

① 哪些具体订单违规？

② 分别违反当时生效的哪一条规则？

③ 你所谓“IP 全部交叉”的具体数据是什么？

④ 你所谓“设备全部交叉”的具体设备标识/编号和对应关系是什么？

⑤ 为什么使用官方 Copy Trading 2.0 的跟单用户也被限制？

⑥ 完成 KYC 后为什么仍然无法处理？

⑦ 200 多个账号、70几万 USDT，目前到底是什么处理状态？

⑧ 什么时候给出明确处理结果和资金返还时间表？

Sheldon，既然是你自己公开提出“IP 和设备全部交叉”这个说法，那就别只丢一句结论出来。

IP 拿出来。

设备记录拿出来。

违规订单拿出来。

对应规则拿出来。

可以脱敏，用户隐私不用公开。

但请不要再用一句无法验证的“风控判定”糊弄所有人。

你有 BitMart 的后台数据，用户没有。

现在是你公开指控 200 多个账号“全部交叉”，那就由你公开证据。

拿得出来，大家看证��。

拿不出来，就别再拿“IP、设备”四个字当万能理由。

@sheldonbitmart
@BitMart_zh
@BitMartExchange
@JackClawAI
#bitmart

[Ageng Priambada @haetfazfer]

@sheldonbitmart @bfs20x Liar, Before going bankrupt bitmart offers a 10.5% usdt lock for up to 6 months

[BitMart债权委员会【官方】 @hyperliquidPro]

致BitMart夏尔特：
BitMart 受害用户的处境已经得到国内媒体关注，事件不再只是圈内部纠纷。大量用户听信平台理财宣传，资产被锁无法提取。我们要求停止口头画饼，不要继续用路线图搪塞大众。9-9日之前，尽快公布真实资产底数、明确兑付比例与时间节点。如果持续回避责任，国内外司法途径会持续推进，所有证据都会完整提交，不要走到无可挽回的地步。 @sheldonbitmart @BitMart_zh @BitMartExchange

2026-9-4日

[viio @arvicizz]

Update regarding my Bitmart Withdrawal!

Still on hold, newest update it not automatically cancelled.. but status update to creted and stuck!

Are u serious? I really need this money for my mom medical treatment chemotherapy

@BitMartExchange

[Travladd 𐤊 @travladd]

I have NO idea how this has basically zero coverage.

@BitMartExchange still owes users tens of millions of dollars in funds, likely $30,000,000 - $100,000,000+

Still spreading awareness for those people.

[Ageng Priambada @haetfazfer]

@DesoulDrew Is it still not possible to wd?

[Ageng Priambada @haetfazfer]

@Owolabi105 @BitMartExchange Still can’t

[Droom @DesoulDrew]

BitMart has my money it’s been 30 Days we need answers. I’m not a rich person this is all I have I was recently fired and I have no money someone please get this message out ya boy is struggling

[BITMART SCAM @bitmart_scam]

🚨 THIS IS NO LONGER JUST ABOUT FROZEN WITHDRAWALS. WE ARE TALKING ABOUT HUMAN LIVES.

We are already receiving messages from relatives of users about people who committed suicide after losing access to their money.

Today, a family from India contacted me. According to them, their brother committed suicide after approximately $1,500 of his funds became tied up in the situation surrounding BitMart. The family is ready to provide information and participate in the legal process.

We are publishing this as a statement from the relatives; the circumstances of the death and any possible connection to BitMart must be officially established by the competent authorities.

Sheldon, we are talking about just $1,500.

Even if we believe BitMart’s displayed withdrawal limit of up to $2,000 per day, why couldn’t this person withdraw even his own $1,500?

How much more has to happen before users are given access to their own funds?

This message and other similar testimonies must be preserved and provided to lawyers and law enforcement authorities.

Behind the numbers on the screen are real people and real families.

Share this. Stories like this cannot be allowed to go unnoticed.

[Littlewhale ₿ 🐂🀄️ @littlewhaleB]

Bitmart and Sheldon first off all you guys announced so called orderly wind down on 26th July and freeze all user's assets then completely go silent no one till today withdrawal their assets from bitmart now 21st August bitmart think restore the platform that is completely fine but do you guys ask your user's they are ok with this decision or not restore platform or wind down now this is upto you I and all bitmart user's want our assets 100% don't update later that we will give upto some % because decision you make at your own choice .. not a single user's should affect and 100% user's assets will be available for withdrawal ....thank you
@BitMart_zh
@BitMartExchange
@sheldonbitmart
#bitmart
#bitcoin
#solana
#bnb
#tron

[King David @KingDavid21973]

BitMart’s restructuring announcement does not resolve the withdrawal crisis. Customers were told withdrawals would remain available during the wind-down, yet many users still cannot access their funds.
The core issue is simple:
If customer assets are fully backed, why can’t customers withdraw them?
BitMart is now discussing restructuring, creditor distributions, and future plans instead of providing clear answers about current customer balances, liabilities, available reserves, or a firm withdrawal timeline.
Affected users should act now, not wait.
BitMart’s own User Agreement requires a formal complaint before arbitration, and it contains a batch-arbitration process for 100 or more substantially similar claims. That could give coordinated users a powerful legal path if handled by the same law firm or organization.
Potential civil claims may include breach of contract, conversion, misrepresentation, consumer-protection violations, and restitution, depending on the evidence and jurisdiction.
The most important evidence to preserve includes:
account balances and withdrawal attempts
transaction IDs and blockchain hashes
support communications
BitMart’s wind-down notices
promotional offers made before the shutdown
wallet movements linked to BitMart
screenshots showing frozen or inaccessible funds
Claims of fraud or insolvency should not be stated as proven unless supported by evidence. The stronger legal position is to demand answers to the questions BitMart has still not answered:
Where are the customer assets?
Are they fully backed?
Why are withdrawals blocked?
Who controls the assets now?
Are customers being treated as creditors?
What is the actual shortfall, if any?
Retaining restructuring lawyers does not excuse BitMart from accounting for customer assets.
The strongest response is:
Demand the funds. Preserve the evidence. Coordinate affected users. Trigger the formal complaint process. Prepare coordinated arbitration or litigation. Require BitMart to prove where the money is.

[BITMART SCAM @bitmart_scam]

🚨 @BitMartExchange, your latest statement is misleading users.

Instead of providing concrete answers about withdrawals, BitMart is talking about restructuring and possible future distributions.

So why do the actions of Sheldon Xia (@sheldonbitmart) and BitMart give users serious grounds to suspect fraud?

1. Forced closure of positions.
Trading pairs were delisted without proper advance notice, resulting in the forced closure of both long and short positions. The delisting notice appeared on the website around the same time, and many users simply never saw it.

2. Users cannot withdraw their money while funds continue to move.
On-chain transactions from known wallets associated with BitMart continued despite users being unable to access their funds. Who controls these assets, where are they being sent?

3. No transparent explanation of customer assets.
There is still no clear, independently verifiable information about available assets, liabilities, or a concrete timeline for returning customer funds.

4. Social media accounts and communications disappeared.
According to affected users, members of the team close to Sheldon deleted or removed access to multiple social media accounts. Telegram accounts and conversations were also deleted.

5. Wallet balances dropped dramatically in July.
According to on-chain monitoring by affected users, balances of wallets associated with BitMart fell dramatically — reportedly by roughly two-thirds during July. These movements require a transparent explanation.

6. APRs were increased before the shutdown.
Shortly before the shutdown announcement, users were offered higher APRs — 11% and above — and encouraged to deposit more funds into Savings.

Afterward, funds held in Savings at these rates were moved back to users' spot accounts without the promised interest being credited.

If the platform was already experiencing liquidity or reserve problems at that point, users deserve to know when management became aware of them and why it continued attracting funds.

7. Registrations and deposits remained available after the shutdown announcement.
Despite announcing a shutdown, new users could still register and deposit funds. At the same time, there was no prominent warning on the main page informing users that they might be unable to withdraw their money. As a result, people could continue depositing.

8. Sheldon disappeared from public view while continuing to suggest that everything was fine with the exchange.
Despite the withdrawal crisis and numerous unanswered questions, Sheldon largely disappeared from public communication while publishing statements that created the impression that the situation was under control.

9. Offices were closed, while regulatory claims raise further questions.
Affected users report that BitMart offices have closed. There are also serious questions regarding representations made about BitMart's regulatory/licensing status in Australia.

10. Tens of thousands of affected users are reporting the same problem.
Telegram communities alone contain tens of thousands of people discussing the situation. Accounts may display daily withdrawal limits of approximately $500–$2,000, yet affected users report being unable to withdraw even $1.

11. The situation has spread far beyond the exchange itself.
Personal information concerning members of Sheldon's family, including his wife, has reportedly been published in Chinese darknet communities. According to reports, rewards are also being offered there for information that could help locate Sheldon.

The involvement of White & Case as restructuring counsel does not mean withdrawals have resumed and does not guarantee that customers will recover their funds.

All of these allegations and observed on-chain movements require transparent answers and an independent investigation.

@BitMartExchange: Where are the customer assets? Who controls them now? Where did the funds go? And when will users finally get their money back?

#bitmart