🔥 BIG: The SEC has approved Paxos as the first blockchain-native clearing agency in the US, a milestone for crypto and traditional finance convergence.
agree it would be pure nonsense if ETH were corporate equity.
But Ethereum is not designed purely to maximize value capture for ETH holders. For some people in the Ethereum ecosystem, it may still count as success if the network is widely used and ETH stays valuable enough to secure the protocol.
That part is bittersweet. The philosophy built on top of cryptography is part of why I fell in love with crypto in the first place — but of course we also want financial returns.
As someone who has been in the Ethereum space since around 2016, this article really resonated with me in a bittersweet way.
Many people, myself included, have long thought about the relationship between Ethereum’s utility as a network and the price of ETH. This article captures that tension very well.
Ethereum is now at least one of the most technically mature smart contract platforms, and the “weak version” of crypto — crypto as infrastructure for TradFi, institutions, and the U.S. financial system "at cost" — is clearly gaining traction. Because of that, parts of the Ethereum ecosystem, such as the EVM and Solidity, will most likely continue to be developed and adopted regardless of what happens to the ETH price.
I spent the weekend putting my thoughts about $ETH and Ethereum into this article
I built my career, community, and business on Ethereum, so the decision to sell deserves a deeper explanation
I hope this is sufficient
Thank you, all
@Cowbayc1 Yeah, I think both moves can make sense: holding the asset you believe in, while also reallocating some capital to major new trends like AI.
It feels increasingly consensus that crypto is a natural payment rail for AI agents.
Hopefully that brings new momentum back to ETH.
@GuruVerseX Yeah, it’s ironic that ETH’s price seemed better supported by OG vibes and foundational tech than by actual global adoption and much more mature infrastructure.
@Okada_DeFi0x That’s right. And now that Ethereum’s roadmap is more L1-centric again, each L2 needs a clearer reason to exist beyond just being a generic L2. One path is to create token-specific utility or value accrual that L1 itself does not provide.
I’m not sure there is a single “best move” back toward the strong version of crypto.
It may get harder and harder to recreate the vibes of past crypto summers as TradFi and institutions enter the space. They probably care much less about CROPS than crypto OGs do — at least until they get hacked 😂
So there’s a bit of a chicken-and-egg problem. But I agree with David’s point here:
https://t.co/8PtrATCPd3
A KOL-led surge in market cap can attract new entrepreneurs and capital, which can then create new interesting apps.
Those apps don’t have to be entirely new categories, or convince ordinary users that decentralization itself matters. It may be enough if the winning product just happens to run on decentralized rails — e.g. Polymarket beating Kalshi.
@CryptoLadyHQ That’s right. However, I read David’s article as arguing that ETH may stagnate or continue to underperform other, more trendy assets — not necessarily decline outright.
It’s already true that ETH has underperformed many other crypto assets over the past few years.
Past returns don’t guarantee that Ethereum’s future network growth will keep translating into ETH value capture.
As Eric pointed out at https://t.co/2c8NXSaYon, ETH’s early run was extremely violent and already rewarded early investors enormously.
But maybe that early period was the exception, driven by momentum and the ETH-as-money narrative. If Ethereum is designed to provide utility at cost, then the network can keep succeeding while the asset price stops compounding in the same way.
I don't really blame David, ETH has grossly underperformed the general crypto market for many years now. I think a lot of his views here are valid and as I've mentioned, I've personally divested a lot out of ETH the past 1-2 years now. To this point, everything I've switched into has greatly outperformed ETH.
Honestly, I don't even think ETH underperforming is really related to any fundamental wrong doing. One thing I think a lot of people fail to realize is how violent the initial ETH run was. It's going to take a long time to shake off the breadth of millionaires that were created in such a short period of time.
At the end of the day, maximalism to a single coin when it comes to portfolio management is pretty silly. The market doesn't lie, there's no reason to trade against it. You can always trade back into a coin if it gets hot.
I think the article is making an even harsher point.
A high P/E stock with a small dividend still implies some equity-like value capture. But Ethereum may end up providing enormous utility at cost, with the surplus captured by users, apps, L2s, stablecoins, and institutions — not necessarily ETH holders.
In https://t.co/8PtrATCPd3, David speculates on the conditions under which ETH, the asset, could regain momentum.
That’s exactly the tension.
It makes sense to sell ETH if Ethereum’s utility keeps growing but ETH value capture remains decoupled from that growth.
More and more people may use stablecoins on Ethereum rails regardless of the ETH price. ETH could become a less attractive asset to invest in, while Ethereum and other EVM chains become everyday infrastructure for ordinary people.