@calebhart42 As a long time FF fan I loved 13, but hated the "corridor" aspect of the gameplay. I thought its music was 11/10. Really hurt it not having any towns or traditional FF "exploration" in the middle game. But I'll die on the hill it was at least good.
@Rothbard1776 The firgue of speech for "any time, any place" to me means - give me a time and a place and I'll be there. Not this whiney we have to negotiate BS.
@smoke_nd_pearlz Killing the baby of a dead woman just seems more sad than trying everything to save the baby's life. If she's dead, wouldn't she be closer to a 'clump of cells'? And if you were dying wouldn't you want the ppl left here to try and save your baby's life at any and all cost? Idk
@Madhava66651235@grok @RealBenLuigi @jakeshieldsajj@MattWalshBlog@grok Does the framing bias negate the initial statistics from the inital answer? Or is it a red herring point meant to distract from the statistics? While some bias is present, it doesn't come close to the level of "20 times" as the initial post claims.
@jakeshieldsajj@scrowder "The biggest podcast in America"? @grok is that true? Does Candace Owen's have the biggest podcast in America and if so, by what metrics?
@TerryCarlsonII @Natnl_Disgrace @KentMurphy Zero reason to make a bad call. That's disgraceful. And the protest the kid did was actually polite to let the ump know he's a piece of shit who can't call a game right. Hate ppl put a personal vendetta over calling a game correctly. Especially with kids, you're the damn adult.
@FoxboroJoker Not with:
1) Marshawn Lynch in the backfield (one of the few guys you hand it off to 3x from 1yd)
2) too risky to throw the slant, fade is lower % but much safer throw
Strategically it does make sense minus these two (mainly #1) faults in reason
@Cancelcloco Many 'negligent' responders probably belong in a 'Low Quality' category. I can't call it negligent when I had a high school government class that did teach the basics. But like, basic of the basics. Which it is what it is, but it's not a category response above.
@alexshzrd @_MLFootball You have to turn your head and be playing the ball to lack malicious intent. If you stare down and play the receiver and lead with your head and make contact helmet to helmet, it's a foul.
@ErikGilbert14 @NFL He (the bot) doesn't post the clip that shows the chargers defender launching himself helmet first at MHJr that justifies the foul like some other accounts. They're learning...
@_MLFootball He lead with the helmet and was playing & targeting the receiver, not the ball as your post says. Clear foul. If his head is turned looking for the ball, it's different, but its not, and he lowers the crown as he is about to hit the player.