✌🏻Miss Haley ☀️

1989 - wife & mom type A ❤️ type C soul in a type B 🌎

[✌🏻Miss Haley ☀️ @haleyseekstruth]

📰 When the River Rose: What the Flood at Camp Mystic Reveals About a Hidden Crisis in Texas’ Summer Camp Corridor

When news broke that flash floods had struck a cluster of summer camps along the Guadalupe River in Hunt, Texas, the headlines were swift and heartbreaking. Camp Mystic, an elite, all-girls Christian camp nearly a century old, was among those hit hardest. As of this writing, 27 campers were reported missing. Some have since been located, while others remain unaccounted for. Search efforts continue as families pray, grieve, and ask the most impossible of questions: How could this happen?

But behind the heartbreak lies something deeper, something that demands not just compassion, but confrontation. This wasn’t just a natural disaster. This was a reveal, of how concentrated power, tradition, and neglect can create conditions where the unthinkable becomes inevitable.

This is not just about one camp. It’s about an entire ecosystem of children’s camps packed into a small riverfront region, operating in ways that, until now, have avoided serious public scrutiny.

[ELIZABETH LANE @imelizabethlane]

Dear @MrsErikaKirk
Honestly, I didn’t feel the need to make a big post or comment about your attendance at the correspondents’ dinner. Where you go or what you do isn’t really something I focus on unless it has a direct impact on things I care about. That said, there’s a pattern that’s hard to ignore, whenever you’re called out for something people perceive as inappropriate, your response tends to be to insult your critics or position yourself as above them, while dismissing others as malicious. At some point, it may be worth recognizing a simpler reality. Many people just don’t like you. And that’s their right. People are free to form their own opinions, even when those opinions aren’t favorable.

Maybe you genuinely don’t see what you’re doing wrong and maybe the criticism you receive feels completely unfair. But have you ever taken a moment to ask yourself, - What part am I playing in this? If you truly aren’t doing anything wrong, then why do the reactions you get seem so consistently at odds with what you expect?

Guess what, there could be a hundred Candaces in the world criticizing you and it still wouldn’t move people unless what they’re saying actually resonates. People don’t just fall for narratives that easily especially today. You cannot force someone to see something they fundamentally don’t see or don’t believe. That kind of influence is incredibly difficult to manufacture just ask the CIA they will tell you all about it.

Quick history lesson, even organizations like the CIA with billions in funding, massive infrastructure, coordinated networks and thousands of operatives have had to invest enormous effort over long periods to shape public perception in any meaningful way. And even then, results are never guaranteed. So the idea that one commentator (Or two or three) no matter how skilled, can single-handedly turn people against you just doesn’t hold up.

The reaction you’re getting isn’t because of Candace, it’s because of you. Your own actions are what people respond to. That’s the uncomfortable reality, wake up to it already, I say this with no hate. At some point, you have to stop deflecting and ask yourself an honest question: why does this keep happening to me? Why do people consistently react this way? We’re not living in North Korea, people are allowed to form and express opinions freely and as long as America is America they will do just that, it is their right, just like it is yours to be unhappy about it. Dismissing all criticism as manipulation avoids the real issue here.

And let’s be clear: you’re not some untouchable public figure in the mold of Jacqueline Kennedy. That comparison doesn’t land the way you think it does. Whoever told you, you could be her is not your friend, get rid of him/her. Curve your own path. Again I don’t say this to be disrespectful.

This isn’t coming from a place of hate, not at all, it’s frustration. A lot of people are tired of the constant back-and-forth, the blame-shifting and the refusal to reflect. You are clearly bothered by all of this, but I don’t see you saying, ''Oh, you know what? These people don’t like me no matter what I do. It’s so unfair, but maybe I should step out of the limelight for a while and see if things change. So it doesn’t hurt the company.''

No, instead, you come out and you have no problem attending parties, dinners and opening events with Nicki Minaj, holding hands, even though your husband clearly didn’t like her. I’m guessing he didn’t like her because most of her songs start with a dick and end with a pussy, or one inside the other (should I tag the songs?). I’m sorry for the expression, but it’s not mine, it is the woman’s you chose to have on stage next to you. Then, at that same event, you’re going to mention the Lord like 50 times and have a literal former stripper speaking in front of students about how they should live. Then you go ahead and criticize the students and everyone else who judge you for this. Do you see the problem?

As Leo Tolstoy wrote, ''All happy families are alike, each unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.'' And while you can understand it as - everyone grieves differently, the point he made was actually much simpler, dysfunction is usually self-generated and unique in its causes. And if Tolstoy were around today, he might put it even more bluntly: no one creates their own problems quite like you do…

I assume you’ve seen my post, most people have, so you’re aware that my opinion of you is far from favorable. That said, in my capacity as a journalist, I haven’t made a habit of targeting you or spending weeks analyzing your every move, event, or speech. I only comment on matters where you have influence over issues I care deeply about. Quite frankly, I’m not extremely interested in you, especially when our country is facing serious challenges.

But what’s actually concerning to me is watching you come out and double down on claims that are demonstrably false. Saying things like, ''Candace Owens is accusing me of murdering my husband,'' or that people who criticize you are evil or something similar, this is simply not accurate. She has not accused you of murder. Not publicly anyway. So why say it?

Because you're reframing the criticism into something more extreme than it is. You’re acting as if anyone who questions you must believe you were involved in your husband’s death and that they must be all evil, while you must be a constant victim of this supposed malice. That’s not what’s being said here at all.

Let’s be clear:
The issue people have with you is different, it’s behavioral, not criminal. I’ve described you as a person exhibiting traits of psychopathy and I stand by that as my opinion. Again I’m allowed to have one, just like you are allowed to disrespect it. I’m not saying this to be cruel, I mean it seriously. Psychopathy reflect something deeply complex and very difficult to deal with in life, not something trivial so trust me when I say, I do not say this with hate at all. It ’s a simple observation.

You may disagree, that is your right. And it is my right to expressing my opinion on a public figure that has made herself a target by refusing to leave the spotlight and cameras even when she gets a negative feedback constantly. Constantly!

And to be precise, if you go back to what @RealCandaceO actually said, her claim was that she intends to prove that something is off about you. She did not say she intends to prove you killed your husband. Those are two completely different arguments and conflating them only distorts what’s actually being discussed. It also should be noted that Charlie Kirk’s investigation is ongoing for Candace and for most of us, and the “Charlie’s Bride” series Candace produced is separate from that ongoing investigation. That is why it is placed separately as an 8-episode series on her YouTube. It is a standalone thing. I kindly invite you to check it out.

So to put it plainly, someone could lose a spouse in a completely unrelated event, like a car accident and still face criticism if their behavior afterward appears detached, performative, or inconsistent with what most people understand as grief. Being criticized for how you act is not the same as being accused of murder. And if Charlie had died in a car accident and you behaved the way you are behaving now, the reaction would be the same (I can speak for myself her). So no, this is not about Charlie or Candace, it’s about you. People are questioning your behavior and what it suggests about your character. That’s the real issue, not murder.

You can keep saying that everyone grieves differently, but apparently this nation and others as well has never seen anyone grieve the way you do that is why they keep talking about it. So maybe you should take a step back and reflect. When millions of people (And they are in millions, this is why it got to the point where it bothers you and your organization) are telling you something feels off, you don’t lash out. You take time to ask yourself why people perceive you that way, especially if you believe that perception is absolutely incorrect. That’s the mature response. Rolling your eyes at people and calling them names isn’t the answer, especially if you want a public career or hope to lead others.

And if you don’t want that scrutiny, then walk away. The spotlight is not for everybody. Or take an example from your husband, who was a warrior, he handled it perfectly. He faced being hated all the time and he still engaged them and accepted them he didn’t tell them to shut up. If he thought people who criticized him were evil, he wouldn’t be sitting in front of them trying to understand their point and help them.

You have the money, you’re taken care of thanks to Charlie. If the spotlight is a burden, step aside and let someone else take on the role, someone the public will accept. If you do that, you’ll likely be forgotten in six months and you won’t have to deal with criticism anymore. You will be able to finally live privately, attend events all day long and no one will care.

But when you say that 'evil people won’t stop you from having it all or what your husband built for you or whatever idea is driving your actions and you say you’ll continue regardless of what people think, great, good for you - but then you should expect people to do exactly that: THINK. And their opinions may not align with what you want. That’s life. Get over it.

You claimed you attended the dinner not to mingle with influential people or enjoy the spotlight, but to meet some journalists who have written negatively about you, to put faces to names. Well, let’s put a face to the name. I’m ready to sit down with you any day, at your convenience, even in your own studio if you prefer. You’re not the only one who values being direct. So here I am, willing to have a genuine conversation. The offer stands. No hate, no disrespect. Just a difference of opinion. Let’s see if what you say is true.

And if you can’t handle an interview with someone who disagrees with you and doesn’t like you,then that’s fine. I totally understand that. Not everyone can do what Charlie did - engaging directly with critics instead of avoiding them.

In that case, you can always put a face to a name in Utah court. Come see me in court, where your husband’s supposed killer is on trial, I'm always there. I suggest you bring a pre-prepared lunch, it can be an absolutely grueling ordeal. Sometimes it goes on for 6+ hours with only 15-minute breaks, with no time to go out and eat. But we sit through it because it’s important. It’s Charlie Kirk!

We are interested in who killed Charlie Kirk and whether we have the right guy and if we do, we want to see that the process goes exactly how it should. So yes, you can find me there. I haven’t seen you even once, not once attending the hearing. Maybe one day you can show up. I bet it will help with the criticism part of things :)).

You said you like directness, so do I. So here you go. I’ll leave my invitation open for you to sit down with me.

[Mason Lemme @LemmeReact]

Why I Quit Turning Point USA 🇺🇸

https://t.co/H0QN0AOgMO

[iyah may @iyahmaymusic]

Imagine if we collab’d 🔥

[JD™ @LostMyHats]

Long before your return to the presidency was ascendant, long before the betting markets were in your favor, there was one impediment that stood in your way. We all knew that J6 was a set-up. But we couldn't prove it to the liking of the establishment and donor class that was terrified to support you because of the public perception that you were an "insurrectionist." Tucker Carlson put his career on the line - and lost it - to take the J6 Tapes to prime time, against the wishes of the Fox News executives who put his head on a platter for it.

Alex Jones was one of the first voices to support you, back when the rest of us thought it was another one of his insane hot takes. But like so many of Alex's insane hot-takes, he turned out to be right. And so many of us, back then, were wrong. And since the beginning, he has served as your High Priest and Intermediary to America's Far Right, your most faithful subject. He became the target of the same Deep State and Intelligence apparatus that went after you. The same railroad they tied you to, they tied him. The same way, with junk lawsuits in which "the process is the punishment" meant to bankrupt him, shame him, and silence him. I don't have to convince you how that system works. You know. Personally.

Megyn Kelly did something that no other self-actualized, glass-ceiling-shattering "boss-babe" would ever do. And that is, despite vulgar attacks and an unnecessary feud of your making, she rose above personal attacks and supported you irrespective of personal disrespect. She could've been the Queen of Crossover Feminists, and had the Left's media apparatus ready to crown her head with a lifetime of media deals if she capitalized on that attention by returning her injury and insult into cold, hard cash. She turned it all down to support you. And support you, she has, out of nothing but the sheer, immovable power of her personal integrity.

None of these people who you've just attempted to savage needed the establishment media. None of them have "lost jobs" as though they had to rent their platforms. They made their own, survived the gauntlet of Beltway Journalism, and proved that they don't have to have a Network to have a following. They are all the New Media. They're the New Media who got you elected when the Establishment Media - Fox News included - gave you the cold, hard shaft. They didn't lose their audience. They gained followers. They built their own platforms by the sweat of their own brow and sheer tenacity of their will, the same way you built skyscrapers. Except they didn't borrow to do it. They paid as they went, out of their own pockets and by the currency of their reputation as people who tell the truth. And it's rewarded them well.

They didn't "turn on you." You turned on them, on all of us, and on yourself. You stabbed MAGA in the back. And now, your biggest supporters are the Washington parasitical filth who held their noses in your presence and sulked at your successes. That is, until you threw in your lot with them, against us. You went into the swamp to drain it. And it has swallowed you. You went to slay Leviathan, and have come back as its pet.

Two things make a man respectable. The first is telling the truth. We recognize your values were formed in Manhattan, and aren't exactly the same as ours. We know you cross lines we wouldn't in the truth-telling department. But until now, we could rationalize it all away by just saying, "It's a part of his negotiation." Or, "Deceit is acceptable in war." God knows, you've been in it. But this is different. You've now lied to US.

But the second thing that makes a man respectable is loyalty to the people who are loyal to him. And that's where you've made a tragic mistake in how you've treated these people, and more, like MTG. Each one of them has disagreed with your decision to break your promises to us. But they've all been loyal to you, even though your pride won't let you see it. They've prayed for your success, vouched for your accomplishments, and kept the wolves off your back day-in, day-out, despite their disagreements. And each one can look you in the eye and ask you the same question as the Apostle Paul, "Have I become your enemy, by telling you the truth?"

Turn back, Mr. President. While you can. Because right now, you act as though you can usurp the authority of God, and God will not be mocked. He's cast down kings before, and the writing is on the wall.

Mene. Mene. Tekel. Parsin.

Numbered. Numbered. Divided. Conquered.

[Ricardo @Ric_RTP]

In 19 days, a jury in Oakland is going to decide whether the entire legal foundation of the AI industry is built on fraud.

Everyone thinks the Musk vs Altman lawsuit is a billionaire grudge match.

Two egos, one grudge, a $150 billion damages number designed for headlines.

Easy to dismiss. Easy to scroll past.

That's exactly what Altman wants you to think.

Because what's actually on trial on April 27 is something much BIGGER than Elon's hurt feelings...

A jury is going to decide whether you can legally take billions of dollars in nonprofit donations, use them to build the most valuable technology in human history, and then quietly convert that nonprofit into a for-profit company worth $850 billion.

If the answer is no, the entire AI industry has a problem.

Because OpenAI is not the only company that did this:

Anthropic was founded by OpenAI defectors using the same nonprofit-first mission language.

xAI pitches itself as building AI "for humanity."

Every frontier lab has used the moral cover of "we're doing this for the good of the world" to attract talent, capital, and regulatory goodwill they would have never gotten otherwise.

An Elon win doesn't just touch OpenAI. It creates a legal precedent that every AI company built on a nonprofit or public benefit promise becomes vulnerable to shareholder and donor clawback suits.

That's why this case matters. And that's why Altman is panicking.

Just look at what he did this week:

Elon filed a motion demanding the court remove Altman and Brockman from their roles and FORCE OpenAI to return to its nonprofit origins.

Then he amended the suit to say if he wins the $150 billion, all of it goes to OpenAI's charity arm. Not him. Zero dollars to Elon personally.

That amendment was surgical. It stripped Altman of his entire public defense.

He can no longer claim this is about Elon's ego or Elon's bank account. Elon is now legally on record saying he just wants the mission back.

OpenAI's response was to panic-write a letter to the California and Delaware attorneys general asking them to investigate Elon for "anti-competitive behavior." Their strategy chief publicly accused Elon of coordinating attacks with Mark Zuckerberg.

They called the lawsuit "harassment driven by ego and jealousy."

That's NOT the response of a company that thinks it's going to win.

Real companies with real defenses don't ask the government to silence the person suing them 3 weeks before trial. They let the evidence speak.

OpenAI is scrambling because they know what's in discovery.
Elon's team has been building this case for two years. Emails, board minutes, internal conversations about the conversion.

The kind of paper trail that juries understand and executives can't explain away.

And the timing couldn't be worse...

OpenAI is trying to IPO at $852 billion. They just raised $122 billion. Microsoft has $135 billion of exposure to them.

A jury verdict that even partially sides with Elon in late April or May would crater the entire IPO runway and send shockwaves through every major AI investor on Earth.

This is why Altman spent the last 2 weeks doing press tours and policy blueprints and "super intelligence agendas" aimed at Washington. He's trying to REFRAME himself as the responsible statesman of AI right before a jury decides if he's a con artist.

Most people will watch this trial start and think it's celebrity drama.

The smart money is watching it and realizing that the legal foundation of the AI boom is about to be tested in court for the first time EVER.

And if that foundation cracks, everything built on top of it is at risk.

[Knoxie @KnoxieLuv]

Another place to watch the BiBi Files without a paywall.

https://t.co/1u9KkMXHZP

[Suzie rizzio @Suzierizzo1]

This is a North Carolina Senator on a livestream trading stocks while on the Senate floor! No wonder they don’t get anything done and are billionaires! 🤬

[Father Joseph DeMarzo @Joseph_DeMarzo]

In recent days, @CarriePrejean1, a Catholic, was removed from the Presidential Commission on Religious Liberty. She was not given notice as to why she was removed, but it is highly plausible that it was because of comments she made during a hearing. I wish to note both a question she asked and a statement she made. In essence, one of the questions she asked was whether a person who is not a Zionist is therefore antisemitic. The statement she made was that Catholics are not Zionists.

Bishop Robert Barron posted on X that she was removed for “browbeating witnesses, aggressively asserting her point of view, hijacking the meeting for her own political purposes.” I must disagree with this statement, having viewed the meeting myself. The purpose of the meeting is to promote religious liberty and to speak out against discrimination and injustice against any person, whether Jewish, Christian, Muslim, or otherwise. Defense of religious liberty under the First Amendment is the defense of all human life.

Her comment was fitting for the meeting, and for the following reason. Carrie asked an important question, which was directed to Yitzchok Frankel. She asked whether one could reject antisemitism and at the same time condemn the mass killing of Palestinians in Gaza, reject political Zionism, or not support the political state of Israel. Carrie was fulfilling her duty as a member of the board in speaking not only for the protection of Jews, but also for Palestinians. It is also a fair question to ask in light of the thousands of Palestinians who have been killed since October 7. As Catholics, we decry the killing of all innocent human life.

Her comment and question were also fitting in helping the committee address the evil of antisemitism. In other words, her words can be interpreted as a caution that, in light of evil antisemitic actions, one must not resort to uncontrolled violence against Palestinians in Gaza. There is a fire that was lit, and she was simply pointing out that another fire has been lit, and one cannot put out fire with fire. She wished to hold all persons accountable for violence against innocent human life.

Furthermore, defining terms is crucial in arriving at proper justice for all. In resolving the issue of antisemitism, it is important to define exactly what that constitutes. It is not foreign to public discussion to speak of Christian Zionism as it pertains to the present conflict in Iran. She, as a defender of all faiths, must be able to defend her own. That she did courageously in noting that Catholics are in fact not Zionists, and that this should not be remotely part of the definition of antisemitism.

The reason this is important is that if rejection of Zionism is equated with antisemitism, it opens the door to the persecution of Catholics, or of people in general. Since this language is part of the current political context when speaking about Israel’s actions, it is just that Catholics, having their own religious liberty under the First Amendment, be able to disagree with religiously or politically motivated actions which do not reflect what it means to be Catholic. Otherwise, we run the risk, as a nation, of gaslighting Catholics as antisemitic, which would itself be a form of religious persecution. The committee cannot serve the purpose of defending religious liberty by denying it to another group, namely Catholics.

Therefore, I support Carrie as a fellow Catholic and American for her bravery, and I am proud of her. In fact, she was recently awarded the Catholic Champion Award at the Catholics for Catholics Prayer for America Gala only a few days ago. Countless Catholics from all over the country viewed this moment, where Catholics came together in solidarity to pray for our nation and to support fellow Catholics in responding to our Lord’s command: “Let your light shine.”

[WhoKilledCK @whokilledck]

For the record... on the day we released the website, our second follower 'accused' us of being John Mappin. Since then, we have been Candace Owens, the FBI, a CIA psyop, 'working for TPUSA', CCP/Qatar funded, Ian Carroll, George Farmer and probably a few others.

It's impossible to prove a negative, but we can confirm that we are none of those people or groups, nor do we represent any of them, nor have we met any of them (we have spoken to John Mappin and can confirm he seems to be a very decent man genuinely seeking the truth).

As we say on the website we are a small team, not one person.

Over the months people occasionally 'discover' that X believes our account was registered in Switzerland. None of us have ever been to Switzerland. But we all know how to use a VPN.

We were not all born in the USA.

But we do all believe that the assassination of Charlie Kirk is perhaps the most consequential global event of our generation.

Look at the world. American politics IS global politics.

Charlie Kirk sat at the heart of American power, and was probably the best chance we had at avoiding a new war in the Middle East.

Power wielded for good or for ill affects us all. America is the centre of the global power structure. America is the home of the military industrial complex. Not only Americans are affected by American wars and American weapons and American banks.

None of us are Russian, Ukrainian, Palestinian, Iranian, Lebanese, or Israeli. But what's going on in all of those places is significant and still matters. And all of us have paid taxes which pay for the bombs flying over and onto these places and their people.

For those with the boring accusation of us profiteering: we don't monetize our X account, our site (used by tens of thousands of people) is totally free to use and has no adverts and no sponsors.

We have made precisely zero dimes (or whatever it is they have in Switzerland) from this entire project which we all do in our spare time because we think it matters.

Why are we anon? We are all advocates of privacy and freedom above all else and this project is not about us as a group or any of us as individuals. It's about showcasing all the work that is being done to get to the truth. And if we can help with that in some way then we feel like we have done something worthwhile.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION IN THIS MATTER.

[Aubrey Laitsch @AubreyLaitsch]

When I was fired, I pointed out that the Uber story they were relying on simply didn’t add up.

For starters, I don’t keep in touch with people from high school, so the premise didn’t make sense. More importantly, what was allegedly said about Erika in that Uber didn’t reflect how I actually felt at the time. I respected her and genuinely felt sympathy for what she was going through. Even their timeline, October or November 2025, kept changing.

It was clear they weren’t interested in hearing me out. So, to move things forward, I looked them both in the eyes and said, “If you want to know how staff and the public are actually feeling, I’ll tell you.” They said yes.

So I did.

I told them the only part of the Uber story that rang true was this: there is real concern about the direction of the organization and who will be leading it going forward. People are worried about their jobs, understandably so given how many have been let go while being told this is a “family.” I also tried to level with them: our CEO had just been brutally murdered on camera, and the team had been pushing forward nonstop in the aftermath.

Their response? They couldn’t keep someone who wasn’t “fully on board.” Andrew and Marina said the two of them alongside a small group of executives had been “keeping the ship afloat.”

That’s when the disconnect became impossible to ignore.

I organized what was reportedly the largest press gathering in modern history (bigger than the Super Bowl) without even two minutes of Andrew’s help. Thousands of calls and texts in the months after Charlie’s assassination. Press coverage across campus tours all fall. Daily media bookings for Andrew and the rest of TPUSA talent. Then I led another national event with over 1,000 members of the press and a full-scale Media Row.

That was my ship — and it floated.

But apparently, bringing real insight from staff and the public and doing the job I was hired to do, didn’t carry much weight.

I guess my version of “keeping the ship afloat” just didn’t align with merch quotas and backstage photo ops.

[Voice of Rabbis @voiceofrabbis]

As an American Jew devoted to Judaism, I ask one thing:

Please stop calling Israel a “Jewish state.”

Call it a Zionist state.
Call it Herzl’s project.

Call it whatever you want but do not place the name of an entire religion on a political entity.

- Our Community Member

[Bishop Joseph Strickland @ Pillars of Faith @BishStrick]

WHEN THE WORLD DEMANDS COMPROMISE

In these days of great confusion, many faithful Catholics are feeling unsettled – some even shaken – by the intensity of political pressure, public accusations, and the growing hostility toward those who simply hold to the perennial teaching of the Catholic Church.

Let me speak clearly, as a shepherd of souls:

“If you feel that the ground beneath you is shaking, it is not because the truth has changed – it is because many have unknowingly anchored themselves to things that cannot hold.

Political parties cannot save us. Governments cannot define truth. And no earthly movement – no matter how powerful – can replace the Kingship of Jesus Christ.

Our foundation is not found in Washington, nor in any administration, nor in any political identity. Our foundation is Jesus Christ.

As Our Lord Himself declares: “Every one therefore that heareth these my words, & doth them, shall be likened to a wise man that built his house upon a rock.” (Matthew 7:24)

That Rock is not a party. That Rock is not an ideology. That Rock is not a geopolitical agenda. That Rock is Christ – and Christ alone.

ON FALSE ACCUSATIONS AND CONFUSION

We are now witnessing a troubling trend: faithful Catholics are being labeled as “anti-Semitic” simply for refusing to adopt certain theological or political positions – particularly those tied to forms of modern Christian Zionism.

Let me be absolutely clear:

The Catholic Church rejects hatred of any people, including the Jewish people. Anti-Semitism is a sin. It is unjust. It is contrary to the Gospel.

But it is equally unjust to accuse Catholics of hatred simply because we do not accept theological positions that are foreign to the Catholic faith.

The Church does not teach that the rebuilding of a temple or adherence to a particular political program is necessary for the return of Christ. Our Lord has already fulfilled the covenant.

The People of God are not defined by ethnicity, nor by political alliances, but by faith in Jesus Christ and obedience to His will.

ON WAR, SUFFERING, AND HUMAN DIGNITY

The Catholic Church does not cheer for war. She does not sanctify violence. She does not ignore the suffering of innocent people – anywhere. Whether in Gaza, Israel, or any part of the world, every human life is sacred.

To speak of suffering, to mourn the loss of innocent life, to call for justice – this is not hatred. It is the Gospel. Our Lord said: “Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God.” (Matthew 5:9)

A Catholic conscience must never be silenced by political pressure or fear of accusation.

OUR POLITICAL IDOLATRY

Many Catholics today are experiencing turmoil because their identity has become too closely tied to a political party or movement. This is a dangerous mistake. No political party fully represents the truth of the Gospel. No administration is the Kingdom of God.

When we anchor ourselves to politics, we will eventually be shaken – because politics always shifts. But when we are anchored in Christ, we remain firm, even when the world trembles.

A WORD TO THE FAITHFUL

If you feel uncertain …
If you feel pressured …
If you feel accused or misunderstood …

Hear this clearly:

You are not on shaky ground if you stand with Christ.

You are only shaken if your foundation is elsewhere.

Return to Him. Remain in Him. Stand firmly in the truth of His Church.

FINAL EXHORTATION

This is not a time for fear. This is a time for clarity. We must reject hatred. We must reject false accusations. We must reject every attempt to force the Church into conformity with worldly ideologies.

And we must proclaim, without compromise:

JESUS CHRIST IS LORD.

Not Caesar. Not any party. Not any movement. Christ alone.

Therefore, stand firm in Him. Do not be shaken, do not be silenced, & do not be led astray. Remain faithful, remain rooted, & hold fast to the truth – no matter the cost.

+Joseph

[MILO @Nero]

Did you take money to call Candace Owens a “demon” on X? If so, we want to hear from you.

Let me rephrase. I got my hands on the list. Fess up now or I’ll name you later this week—alongside the pathetic, pitiful sum of money you accepted to do it.

[Rep. Anna Paulina Luna @RepLuna]

I think our next task force hearing will be on MK Ultra.

[✌🏻Miss Haley ☀️ @haleyseekstruth]

https://t.co/JLqAfEmfVa

[illuminatibot @iluminatibot]

Newsmax reporting it’s time to arrest Barack Obama

“It should shake every single American in their shoes. I hate to say this, but President Barack Obama, there is now incontrovertible evidence that he was the spearhead of a seditious conspiracy to subvert the will of the American people and overthrow the United States government back in 2016.

We must, absolutely must, hold every one of these criminals accountable for the crimes that they committed. They are the most heinous crimes committed in American history. James Comey, John Brennan, Clapper, Rice, Biden was in the meeting on July 28th in the Oval Office.

They briefed Barack Obama on Hillary Clinton's plan to tie Trump to Russia collusion lies. It consumed our national discourse for 5 years. It undermined a sitting, duly elected president. It sabotaged administration. It framed a three-star general.

It destroyed and ripped this country apart. We had a constitutional crisis, the likes of which I don't think any American can fully comprehend. It is atrocious, and every single one of them must be held accountable”

[Lozzy B 🇦🇺𝕏 @TruthFairy131]

Thought I’d do a check in…

How’s everyone feeling today?

It’s been a pretty wild week 🙃

Satanic Pedo Rings are real

The Jewish mafia basically runs the world

The Elite eat children

Kurt Cobain was murdered

Michael Jackson wasn’t a pedo

Charles Manson was part of the MK Ultra experiment & used the same techniques on his followers as were used on him

The Iraq War wasn’t about weapons of mass destruction, it was a front to steal ancient artefacts related to Gilgamesh

Trump was an FBI informant against Epstein

Pizzagate is real

Q was right

Epstein didn’t kill himself & could still be alive. The FBI erased the jail footage, created the death certificate the day before death & wheeled out a stretcher with sheets & boxes inside place of Epstein’s body

2020 Election was stolen

What did I miss?

I wonder what the next week will bring? 👽🛸

[karma @karma44921039]

GUILTY OF MASS MURDER:

U.S. Harvard Professor confirms through an Official Court Affidavit that the Covid Vaccines are Bioweapons of Mass Destruction. He says the FDA, CDC, DOD Top Officials and Covid Vaccine Executives should be charged with mass murder

[John Mappin @JohnMappin]

The truth is coming.

Thank you @RepThomasMassie

[dejanira @dejanirasilveir]

🚨🚨 Kurt Cobain NUNCA SE SUICIDÓ.
¡SIEMPRE LO SUPIMOS!

¿Ustedes se acuerdan a Kurt Cobain diciendo que en la isla que quedaba frente a su casa violaban niños?

Poco después a Kurt lo encontraron sin vida ( Lo silenciaron para siempre)😳

Un nuevo análisis forense privado, difundido AFIRMA que la muerte de Kurt Cobain en 1994 NO FUE UN SUICIDIO.

¡EL TRATÓ DE ADVERTIRNOS!