In 1997 the Tories bequeathed New Labour:
- 3.5% GDP growth
- 4.5% wage growth
- 4.6% manufacturing output growth
- Energy independence and falling energy prices
- A brand new nuclear power station (1995)
- New reservoirs (1992)
- Construction of Manchester airport's second runway
- Falling unemployment
- London as the world’s leading foreign-exchange centre
- A newly opened Channel Tunnel
- Debt at just 37% of GDP
- On track for a balanced budget
Andy Burnham just said that this was failure. Somehow.
Labour has introduced an Islamic blasphemy law via the back door — and it is already having a chilling effect on free speech.
The “anti-Muslim hostility” definition, formerly known as Islamophobia, is being adopted by police forces, prosecutors, courts and the NHS, as well as private-sector organisations and charities.
It will make it even harder to discuss the fundamental challenges we face, like Islamist extremism, and national scandals such as the grooming gangs, with those who speak out fearful of being branded “Islamophobic”.
As Shadow Justice Secretary Nick Timothy says: “It’s a get-out-of-jail-free card for extremists.”
Not only did the Government appoint a working group whose five members had troubling links to Islamist organisations; it also deleted every response to the Working Group’s consultation. It is now almost certain that extremists were able to influence the drafting of the definition.
This is a major cover-up at the heart of government. Government departments are required to retain historical records of those who contributed to key consultations such as this for 20 years.
Angela Rayner has serious questions to answer. The British public deserves to know who drafted Labour’s Islamic blasphemy law.
A fantastic video from @NJ_Timothy 👇
In what world did the Government think it acceptable to delete every response to the consultation that helped draft the anti-Muslim hostility definition — Britain’s new Islamic blasphemy law?
It is clear there has been a cover-up in Angela Rayner’s Communities Department.
Did ministers allow extremists to influence the definition while excluding the Free Speech Union and the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) from the process?
This is a national disgrace. The public deserves to know the truth.
The anti-Muslim hostility definition has already had a chilling effect on free speech. It has been weaponised by activists, police forces and even Labour MPs to silence legitimate criticism and debate about Islam.
EXC: Migrant households received £12bn in Universal Credit last year.
That is an increase of 57% on the total paid out in 2023.
£7.7bn of this went foreign national households with at least one person out of work.
🚨🇷🇺 BREAKING: Exit polls project that President Putin’s United Russia has won a majority in the State Duma election
Exit Poll Results:
🔵 United Russia: 52.8% (+2.98)
🔴 Communist Party: 14.8% (-4.13)
🟦 LDPR: 9.9% (+2.35)
🩵 New People: 8.6% (+3.28)
🟠 A Just Russia - For Truth: 5.5% (-1.96)
Anti-war Yabloko was barred from contesting the election after being removed from the ballot by Russia’s Supreme Court
Source: Infomar
If a right wing mob put a Green Party campaign manager in hospital and attacked their canvassers leading up to a by-election it would be a national scandal and condemned by the PM
The Hamas Gaza Health Ministry claims roughly 72,000 deaths in Gaza. The IDF says it has killed about 25,000-26,000 combatants, a number also reported by President Trump in October 2025. If you subtract 25,000 from 72,000, even using Hamas’s number at face value, you get roughly 47,000 non-combatant deaths, or a bit less than a 2:1 ratio. If you were modest to adjust for natural deaths and Hamas-caused deaths, is likely closer to 35,000–40,000 non-combatant deaths versus 25,000 combatants killed, which puts the ratio closer to 1.5:1. If you compare 2:1 or 1.5:1 to any numbers we have (in many cases we don’t have) for wars, urban centric wars, contested urban battles they will be some of the lowest ratios (in some cases lowest by far) ever seen despite none of those wars or battles had the context of Gaza. For example: World War II – 70 million civilians, 20 million combatants, 3.5:1 Korean War – 2.5 million civilians, 90,000 combatants, 27:1 Iraq War – 280-300,000 civilians, 150-200,000 combatants, 1.4:1 to 2:1 But wait, the Gaza numbers are usually aggregated numbers for the entire war, any death ever reported in Gaza. But if you disaggregate the numbers to specific battles like Rafah, Khan Yunis, Gaza City 2025 for comparison you get different numbers. Based on modest numbers from the Battle of Rafah, the civilian to combatant ratio would be more like 1:100 due to multiple operational variables like the success of civilian evacuations.
https://t.co/rYGgDHk66C
They were literally offered a state less than one year prior to this.
Clinton presented his final "bridging proposals" (The Clinton Parameters) to both sides in December 2000.
Palestine would retain 92% of the West Bank, and all of Gaza.
Israel voted to accept, then Palestine collapsed the talks.
This remains the closest moment to Palestine obtaining statehood, since the entire Arab world invaded Israel the day it came into modern existence.
It was brokered by America, and this is how America was thanked.
“The stench of sleaze coming from Reform.”
Meanwhile the Labour Party.
Angela Rayner - tax improprieties.
Louise Haigh - fraud.
Mike Amesbury - GBH.
Rachel Reeves - CV lies and rental improprieties.
Peter Mandleson - Close paedophile and sex trafficker associate.
Tulip Siddiq - convicted MP
Rushanara Ali - price gouging tenants.
Lucy Powell - “Dog whistle politics”.
Johnathon Reynolds - fake solicitor.
Jas Athwal - slum landlord.
Andrew Gwynn - WhatsApp scandal
Ivor Caplin - Paedophile sting
Dan Norris - Child sex allegations.
Nick Brown - ?????
🚨NEW: After Hampshire Police introduced a ban on face masks and balaclavas at the protests in Portsmouth, a man in a Burka was let off after claiming he was identifying as a Muslim woman
The number of people receiving personal independence payments (PIPs) because of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) passed 100,000 for the first time in April, Department for Work and Pensions data show.
In the same month, there were 82,000 soldiers in the British Army, despite the threat posed by Russia and Iran.
On Wednesday, Andy Burnham revealed that he would not cut welfare to fund the military and said that supporting national security could not come “at the expense of social security” ⤵️
https://t.co/C7mNf06Kd1
Just so we're clear...
We've had years and years of Islamist thugs roaming our streets masked up, Muslim women in burqas and left wing mobs hiding their identities.
That's acceptable. A few words of mild concern, but generally nobody cared.
But now is when the establishment acts?
After just ONE protest of concerned patriots who were looking to highlight the invasion of our country.
One protest from them, and the entire political establishment jumps into action.
Where was that passion before?
Labour, Reform, Tories. The police, the media.
Now is when they all passionately agree that face coverings are unacceptable and must be banned?
Our establishment is rotten to the core and must be replaced.
Years of left, far left protests over Israel with face coverings and no one bats an eye lid. 2 protest in 3 days by the right over immigration with face coverings and we get this language and bans on them! Says it all!
It's an initialism and a horrible one at that.
Britain is far better and classier shorthand for the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland than 'UK'.
'National security cannot come at the expense of social security' isn't the only PMQs claim Burnham will come to regret. 'We will always stand with the underdog' is equally foolish. Argentina would be the smaller power in another Falklands conflict. Would he support them?