Jane Austen-Remover

(she/he/it, 20, 🏳️‍⚧️✒, ExD) name’s Eos/Arabella. diy hrt distributor. barely functional. prolly autistic. not the calm in our storm. too many gfs. hrt 4/20/24

[Jane Austen-Remover @halothanegrl]

new @ bc that shit was lowk cringe, priv is @halothane_priv now

[Jane Austen-Remover @halothanegrl]

@Mirs_____ idrk, tbh. he was sticking strictly to wpath guidelines, mostly. argued anything else didn’t have the proof to back it up, even in the face of studies. so it was probably just being kind of arrogant and stuck in his ways, not rly either of those.

[Jane Austen-Remover @halothanegrl]

@Mirs_____ another reason i switched, or i guess more just a reason i chose not to stick with a prescribed regimen, is that my endo insisted he would not prescribe progesterone either.

[Jane Austen-Remover @halothanegrl]

@Mirs_____ they can’t prescribe injections because they aren’t produced here. some less stringent doctors can get them from compounding pharmacies but mine wasn’t that type. and yeah, his dosage goal was significantly below what i wanted to achieve and i had frankly grown tired of arguing.

[Jane Austen-Remover @halothanegrl]

@cimoputer4man @Monkey2Bubble @outhcrowfreak you did not bother to spend more than ten seconds to read what i wrote and took an actively hostile interpretation away from it, there’s no reason for me to be kind either.
also, you said some really stupid shit.

[Jane Austen-Remover @halothanegrl]

@cimoputer4man @Monkey2Bubble @outhcrowfreak note how i highlighted “also” for you to ensure you understand i wasn’t saying i think these labels are bigoted. dumbass.

[Jane Austen-Remover @halothanegrl]

@cimoputer4man @Monkey2Bubble @outhcrowfreak omg are you illiterate? i said giving history and tradition any kind of authority is regressive. i made no comment on the actual labels.
and yea, any stance against bigotry will *also* exclude people. exclusion isn’t inherently bad.

[Jane Austen-Remover @halothanegrl]

@bundleofstyyx @Sinister_Sophia yknow, there’s a pretty simple way to mark something as a question and you seem to have forgotten to add it.

[Jane Austen-Remover @halothanegrl]

@cimoputer4man @Monkey2Bubble @outhcrowfreak and? so have all kinda of unquestionably regressive traditions. besides, being queer is ancient, in the thousands of years of human history decades are meaningless.

[Jane Austen-Remover @halothanegrl]

@AneofArc this also excludes people that most would agree are women, individuals who developed ovaries and underwent estrogen-dominant puberty. there are a variety of conditions that produce non-XX cissexual women whose status your definition also denies.

[Jane Austen-Remover @halothanegrl]

the way if you press terfs about what defines sex they start talking like creationists is really interesting.

[Jane Austen-Remover @halothanegrl]

@AneofArc i appreciate the simplicity of this definition, but it runs afoul of the exact same problems as the “purpose” definition, where it simply isn’t useful in most situations. what actually matters are without exception phenotypic traits. genetic sex is at most a good shorthand.

[Jane Austen-Remover @halothanegrl]

@knowbodiez @chipettemunk oh so you’re ancient and that’s why you’re scared of saying the word fuck?

[Jane Austen-Remover @halothanegrl]

@knowbodiez @chipettemunk confused by the basic concept of using more than one set of pronouns

[Jane Austen-Remover @halothanegrl]

@knowbodiez @chipettemunk ok 12yo

[Jane Austen-Remover @halothanegrl]

@L0veandM3th @cinnamonmaxxing short, quippy and wrong, a style of argument it’s impossible to “win”. you won’t change your mind because it’d be losing. i’m content knowing your understanding of sex is incoherent and basically religious.

[Jane Austen-Remover @halothanegrl]

@knowbodiez @chipettemunk it’s not? bffr

[Jane Austen-Remover @halothanegrl]

@L0veandM3th @cinnamonmaxxing “they just are”. nothing makes them that sex, “they just are”. but also it’s super important and definitely real. laughable. what a definition.

[Jane Austen-Remover @halothanegrl]

@L0veandM3th @cinnamonmaxxing big words coming from someone disagreeing with the majority of biologists on what an individual’s sex is (an aggregate of physical traits on a two-peaked continuum)

[Jane Austen-Remover @halothanegrl]

@L0veandM3th @cinnamonmaxxing we are talking about sex as a trait of an individual, not a concept of knowledge. yea, it’s relevant to us all how we evolved. that doesn’t make an individual’s sex in any way relevant to understanding them.