Tora 𐤊

Kaspa / KRC721 NFT 🐈‍⬛

[Tora 𐤊 @hanatoragin]

@AlterOR1GiN クリプト民、共通のあるあるですね😂

[𝙆𝙖𝙨𝘾𝘼𝙋.𐤊𝘢𝘴 @Kaspa_CAP]

@BitgetJP @bitbank_inc
@bitFlyer
@coincheckjp
Kaspa現物を取り扱ってください🙏✨

[AlterCrypto @AlterOR1GiN]

#ハードウェアウォレット
今回はハードウェアウォレット「ColdCard」で発生した資金流出事件についてまとめた内容になっています💡
ハードウェアウォレットのセキュリティが脅かされる中、私たちは何をしなければならないのかについて解説しています😊

https://t.co/MYu3oDSpVu

[Tomu. ‎𐤊 @mike_papadayo]

#kaspa のウォレット1は@binance で
@_BinanceJapan から日本で最初に
上場して日本に旋風を起こす夢を見た。
そう。。それは夢の話

でもなんかそうなりそうな気もする
ねえ？@_BinanceJapan
世界中のKASPAホルダー様
どうかいいね👍リポスト
ブックマークで協賛ください😆

[AlterCrypto @AlterOR1GiN]

来てしまったかー😓
残念😫

[Tora 𐤊 @hanatoragin]

@AlterOR1GiN Bybitに続きBitgetもですか…
いよいよな感じですね😥

[Kaspa King @KaspaKing1]

🛡️ Tangem Wallet for Kaspa: How Secure Is It Really? (Educational Thread)
With all the recent hacks making headlines (Coldcard entropy issues, bridge exploits, key compromises), a lot of you are asking about hardware wallets. I use Tangem for my $KAS stack — here’s a clear, balanced breakdown.
Why Tangem Works Well for Kaspa
• ✅ Keys never leave the card: Generated inside an EAL6+ Samsung secure element chip. Signing happens on the hardware via NFC tap. Phone/app doesn’t touch your private keys.
• ✅ Seedless by default: Backup with extra cards (2- or 3-card set) instead of writing 12/24 words. Huge win — eliminates the #1 way people lose funds (seed exposure).
• ✅ Native Kaspa support. Clean app experience for send/receive.
• ✅ Strong audits (Kudelski, Riscure, Cure53). No known remote drains of user funds.
It’s convenient (credit-card form factor) and keeps your cold storage truly offline most of the time. Perfect for long-term HODL while staying in control.
The Real Risks (Be Honest)
• Physical attacks: Recent Ledger Donjon research showed a sophisticated laser fault injection that can reset the access code. Requires:
• Physical possession of your card
• $250k+ lab equipment + expertise
• Visible damage to the card
Practical risk for most? Extremely low. Not remote. If you don’t lose the card, this isn’t touching you. Tangem calls it “virtually non-existent” for everyday users — real losses come from phishing, bad seeds, or hot wallets far more often.
• Phone dependency for verification: Always double-check addresses/amounts. Malware on your phone is the bigger daily threat.
Tangem vs Others (Quick Note)
Compared to air-gapped options like Coldcard (stronger verification screen/QR but had its own firmware entropy drama recently), Tangem prioritizes simplicity and seedless design. No one wallet is perfect pick based on your threat model.
Bottom line: For Kaspa accumulation in 2026, Tangem is a solid, secure choice if you maintain physical control of the cards. Self-custody beats exchanges every time, but opsec matters.
What’s your go-to hardware wallet for $KAS or BTC? Drop it below — let’s educate the timeline.
#Kaspa #KAS #SelfCustody #CryptoSecurity #Bitcoin #HardwareWallet
Stay safe out there — buy button remains stuck 🚀

[𝙆𝙖𝙨𝘾𝘼𝙋.𐤊𝘢𝘴 @Kaspa_CAP]

KRC-20, KCC-20, and stablecoins.

All are tokens built on Kaspa, but what truly matters for KAS is not the difference between technical standards.

What matters is:

Where does the money come from, and where does KAS ultimately go?

The typical flow of capital in KRC-20 looked like this:

Buy KAS
→ Use it to mint or purchase tokens
→ Issuers, sellers, and miners receive KAS
→ That KAS is sold to realize profits or cover operating costs

This creates temporary demand for KAS.

However, much of this activity does not bring new capital into the Kaspa economy and keep it there. It often just moves existing KAS between participants within the same community.

Speculative capital moves into KRC-20 tokens, while the KAS received by issuers, sellers, and miners can become sell pressure.

In other words, projects often end up recycling and competing for the same limited pool of capital.

Would KCC-20 be different?

The answer is: it depends on how it is used.

Even if a KCC-20 token operates natively on Kaspa L1, its economic structure will not be very different from KRC-20 if it is used only for trading memecoins.

The true value of KCC-20 is not the ability to create more tokens.

It is the ability to become infrastructure for DEXs, lending, collateral, real-world assets, stablecoins, and other applications that can bring external assets into Kaspa.

In particular, if officially issued, Kaspa L1-native USDT or USDC became available, the flow could look like this:

External dollar liquidity enters Kaspa L1
→ KAS/USDT and KAS/USDC liquidity is formed
→ KAS is locked in LPs or used as collateral
→ Holders gain access to dollar liquidity without selling KAS
→ Payments, trading, and lending circulate within Kaspa L1

This would create an economic structure fundamentally different from KRC-20.

Bridged stablecoins can be useful as an initial way to test demand, but they still introduce bridge risk and dependence on intermediaries.

The ideal outcome is not for someone to simply create a token and call it USDT or USDC.

It is for Tether or Circle to issue it officially, make it redeemable for one dollar, and enable major exchanges to support direct deposits and withdrawals through the Kaspa network.

KRC-20 made people “spend” KAS.

A simple KCC-20 token may still do little more than make people “spend” KAS.

But a KCC-20-enabled ecosystem built around official stablecoins and DeFi could make liquidity providers, borrowers, applications, and markets continuously “need” KAS—as liquidity, collateral, and a reserve asset.

Kaspa does not need an endless proliferation of tokens.

It needs a structure that attracts external liquidity and keeps KAS inside the ecosystem—not as an asset waiting to be sold, but as liquidity, collateral, and a reserve asset.

If that becomes a reality, KAS will evolve from an asset that must be sold to access dollars into an asset that can provide access to dollar liquidity while still being held.

That difference is enormous.

[AlterCrypto @AlterOR1GiN]

#Kaspa
スペースを聞いて思ったこと…
ハードフォーク以降、本当に情報の質が変わった（難易度が何段か上がった）のは、完全に同意です😣
理解するのに難儀する内容も多いです😅
ただ、お二人には貴重な情報発信について感謝しておりますので、ぜひ今後とも続けていただきたいなーと思っています☺️

[Tora 𐤊 @hanatoragin]

https://t.co/5XNyBusSCn
Kaspaヒストリーの動画でお馴染みのPoW Shift Riseさんによる、Kaspa基礎講座的動画がスタートしました！

[Tora 𐤊 @hanatoragin]

@kaspan_c 誤解を恐れずに言えば、どちらも大事なのは当然ですが、価格に関しては、技術＜ユースケース、だと思っています。

[Tora 𐤊 @hanatoragin]

@kaspan_c 全く同意見です！

[Tora 𐤊 @hanatoragin]

@kaspan_c こんばんはー

[𝙆𝙖𝙨𝘾𝘼𝙋.𐤊𝘢𝘴 @Kaspa_CAP]

Kaspa’s greatest remaining challenge is not another chain—it is adoption.

I asked AI to run 100,000 simulations based on three assumptions:

DAGKnight is successfully implemented.
Institutional accumulation and price suppression come to an end.
Kaspa achieves global adoption.

From the future looking back, today’s price may seem unbelievably small.

[𝙆𝙖𝙨𝘾𝘼𝙋.𐤊𝘢𝘴 @Kaspa_CAP]

Kaspa’s future cannot be reduced to the phrase “a fast payment currency.”

Autonomous payments between AI agents.
Second-by-second payments for APIs, GPUs, data, and storage.
Energy markets where solar systems, batteries, and EVs autonomously buy and sell electricity.
RWAs such as real estate, government bonds, gold, intellectual property, and power-generation infrastructure.
Stablecoins, DEXs, lending, insurance, and cross-border payments.
Gaming assets and automated distribution of music royalties.
Machine-to-machine payments across logistics, IoT, robotics, drones, and autonomous vehicles.
And a universal value-transfer layer capable of withstanding disasters and network partitions.

Kaspa has the potential to bring all of this together on the same L1.

The security, fairness, and decentralization of PoW—principles proven by Bitcoin.
The parallel processing and real-time performance of BlockDAG.
The UTXO model.
L1 programmability through Toccata.
And beyond that, DAGKnight.

Traditional blockchains have always sacrificed one quality to gain another.

Secure, but slow.
Fast, but centralized.
Programmable, but dependent on concentrated capital or a limited set of validators.

Kaspa is not aiming for another compromise between these trade-offs.

It aims to preserve the security of PoW while achieving the speed and programmability associated with—and potentially beyond—PoS chains.

If DAGKnight is implemented according to its design goals, and Kaspa gains stablecoins, liquidity, developers, applications, and excellent UX, then based purely on technical architecture, it may be difficult to identify a clear competitor.

Of course, superior technology does not guarantee adoption.

Kaspa’s greatest remaining opponent is not another chain.

It is adoption itself.

Awareness.
Developers.
Liquidity.
Regulatory integration.
UX.

These are the barriers Kaspa must overcome.

So I will not say that anyone who chooses not to adopt Kaspa is foolish.

But if DAGKnight becomes a reality and people continue to dismiss Kaspa as merely another PoW coin—without seriously examining the technology—

that may prove to be one of the greatest oversights in evaluating the future of money.

Kaspa’s final form is neither simply digital gold nor merely a fast payment currency.

It is a real-time PoW economy in which people, businesses, nations, AI, machines, energy, and real-world assets can exchange value on the same timeline.

In the future, KAS may not be a currency we consciously choose to use.

It may become the foundational asset of digital society—used quietly beneath the surface whenever the world moves.

We see that future.

[AlterCrypto @AlterOR1GiN]

#地震
熊本震度7ということで、被災地付近の方は余震の可能性もありますので、安全な場所に避難しましょう😥
山では落下物なども発生する可能性がありますので、山道を運転される方などはお気を付けください⚠️

[AlterCrypto @AlterOR1GiN]

#Kaspa
KCC-0020（KCC20）について、解説したものになっています😊
コア開発陣が創造する新たなトークン規格とそれを取り巻くアプリ層での取り組みについて解説をした内容になります😄
※内容には個人解釈を含みますので、ご注意ください

https://t.co/VbppRE5IUg

[𝙆𝙖𝙨𝘾𝘼𝙋.𐤊𝘢𝘴 @Kaspa_CAP]

Is Kaspa’s current sell pressure being artificially amplified?

KAS currently records roughly $0.9M in daily spot volume, compared with approximately $15.4M in futures volume—about 17 times more.

Futures allow traders to short KAS without owning any actual KAS. When perpetual futures trade lower, that pressure can spread into spot markets through arbitrage and market-maker hedging. Falling prices can then trigger forced long liquidations, creating additional selling pressure.

We have already seen an example of this.

On October 25–26, 2024:

• Approximately $800K in KAS long positions was liquidated across Binance, Bybit and Huobi
• KAS futures open interest fell by roughly 35%
• Binance’s KAS funding rate briefly reached −0.101276%
• Funding remained negative for four consecutive settlements

Negative funding means shorts were paying longs, indicating a strong short-side imbalance in the perpetual market.

This does not prove deliberate price manipulation. It does, however, show how derivatives positioning and cascading liquidations can amplify a decline far beyond ordinary spot selling.

In other words, KAS may not be trading at this level simply because holders have lost faith and sold their coins.

Large amounts of capital can create substantial sell pressure without owning any KAS—and that pressure can influence spot price discovery.

If Kaspa has not been abandoned, but has instead been held down by powerful market pressure—

A return from approximately $0.029 to its previous all-time high of $0.207 would already represent a gain of more than 7×.

A move to $1 would be roughly 35×.

If that pressure is eventually released—and short covering begins—how far could Kaspa fly?

[Tora 𐤊 @hanatoragin]

@AlterOR1GiN 換算した同じ額だとしても、円やドルとはまるで違いますもんね😁