@SumasDe@AzocG74559@Markus_Soeder The Russians are the most likely benefactors. The attack in Munich will likely increase support for the AfD who do not think that Germany should support Ukraine. Thus although the attack was instrumented by an Afgan, a thorough search needs to be conducted for any facilitators.
@n177cj@goddek Telegraph - France
Telephone - Germany
Lightbulb - Britain
Aeroplane - Germany
Atomic Power - Britain
Transistor - Britain
Digital computer - Britain
Moon landing - not invention
Internet - USA and other
Commercialising existing inventions - USA
@P_Kallioniemi Yes, it is wrong in a society where the judiciary and prosecuters are not political appointments. They are however in the USA. Biden's decision is therefore quite understandable.
@mark_slapinski Yes, we are wary of the dangers of radical Islam. We are also wary of the process of radicalization by posting videos in a public forum, normalising mob violence, and denigrating an entire ethnic group, and the rule of law. Suggest you read "How fascism works" by Jason Stanley.
@BillGarcia1975@realdogenews What absolute nonsense.
Biden's action is not an offensive, and neither is it unprovoked. It was an artificial restraint in the first place to put conditions on the use of weapons needed defence. No-one is attacking Russia, just heading off their cross border attacks on cities.
@Carpe_Felis@TheNorfolkLion You are confusing this with the fact that Americans have a constitutional right to bare legs.
As regards the lady her problem seems nothing to do with her skin colour, but she acts as a religious fanatic and man is over-reacting, maybe for the effect in this radicalising video.
@Just_here2Troll@bsilone@elonmusk@MarioNawfal Two points here:
1. Not "Ukraine area", but "Soviet Socialist Republic of Ukraine". Before the USSR Ukraine has a 700 year long history.
2. I would suggest that the main source of corruption comes from their Eastern neighbour, not those recent US presidents.
@DannyBacon1974@gpz01@ossymans@AlexTaylorNews By "millions Cameron spent" I suspect you are referring to the document sent at tax payer's expense to all households under section 7 of the EU Referendum Act 2015. That was a statutory duty not a whim of Cameron. https://t.co/vmoObUahcq
@DannyBacon1974@gpz01@ossymans@AlexTaylorNews By "millions Cameron spent" I suspect you are referring to the document sent at tax payer's expense to all households under section 7 of the EU Referendum Act 2015. That was a statutory duty not a whim of Cameron. https://t.co/vmoObUahcq