@ggreenwald please interview Dr. Robert Rowen M.D. who went to west Africa for the first Ebola Crisis & successfully helped with this: https://t.co/Qy6I8WIUyc
He wants to help again, but needs help
His substack: https://t.co/FswlJ3JPDM. .
disregard auto input below
@PioneerMama Dear Ms Tarra, It would be helpful if you can please send link for the actual bill so that we can read it. and then we can also send that link to our list. thanks so much
Add this to the growing list of documented EMF health risks: headaches, sleep disruption, fertility issues, cardiac effects, and cancer. https://t.co/mEk5stcZiT
@LukeSlywaker Fantastic report Luke, thank you! and Rich so well articulated the crux of this matter! Thank you Rich, and ALL who helped with this effort! Was a great team effort. 🩷🩷🩷. . . Makes me feel we are at a turning point for truth and freedom 🇺🇸
Thank you to the Encinitas City Counsel for unanimously voting to table last night’s item that would have established a license agreement to move forward with the Ubiquia Corporation that specializes in SMART city infrastructure, including small cell antenna attachments and video surveillance.
Special thank to to my friend Rich Van Every for drawing my attention to this issue, as well as to City Council member Luke Shaffer for your steadfastness in expressing your concerns over the potential hazards of this unnecessary and potentially dangerous Orwellian technology
The Sunshine State is getting it RIGHT! 🌞
Florida is shutting down dangerous weather modification and geoengineering schemes because our skies belong to the people, not globalist elites and their experiments.
Now it’s time to do the same nationwide. My Clear Skies Act will END chemical spraying, geoengineering, and weather manipulation across America for good.
No more tampering. No more lies. Just clear, God-given skies! 🇺🇸☀️
I introduced HR 5704 to repeal the 2013 Smith-Mundt Modernization Act and prohibit the domestic dissemination of federally funded propaganda.
Taxpayer-funded fake news should not be used by the State Department to wage influence campaigns against the American people.
It is flat-out misleading because it ignores the hard biophysics of how nicotine protects against disease, painting it as a cancer-promoting villain instead.
Nicotine’s molecular interactions with mitochondria and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) drive beneficial effects that the article sidesteps, relying on cherry-picked, tobacco-confounded data while showing zero grasp of biophysical reality. This study’s narrative is a disservice to nicotine’s potential. Here’s how things actually work at the molecular level.
Nicotine slashes oxidative stress by binding to complex I in the mitochondrial electron transport chain, competing with NADH to slow electron flow. This cuts reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, which otherwise wreaks havoc on DNA and proteins, fueling diseases like cancer and neurodegeneration. By damping ROS, nicotine stabilizes mitochondrial DNA, reducing heteroplasmy—the toxic mix of mutant and wild-type mtDNA that drives cellular dysfunction. This isn’t speculative; nicotine’s high-affinity binding to complex I (K_d ~10⁻¹¹ M) directly lowers superoxide output, protecting cells from oxidative damage. The article skips this entirely, obsessing over nicotine’s metabolism into TSNAs like NNK, which is a tobacco-specific problem, not nicotine’s fault. By conflating the two, it misrepresents nicotine’s clean, protective action in mitochondria.
Nicotine also acts as a signaling powerhouse, binding nAChRs to trigger calcium fluxes and cascades like PI3K/Akt, regulating inflammation, cell survival, and apoptosis. It cranks up ROS in cancer cells to levels that force apoptosis, wiping out malignant cells. This is a straight-up anticancer mechanism, yet the article fixates on nicotine’s anti-apoptotic effects in some cancer models, ignoring the biophysical truth that ROS follows a biphasic curve—high levels kill cancer cells, not help them.
Nicotine’s nAChR signaling also boosts NAD+ synthesis via NAMPT, slashing inflammation and protecting against neurodegenerative and metabolic diseases like Alzheimer’s and diabetes. The article doesn’t touch this, blindly pushing a narrative that nicotine fuels tumors, despite its clear regulatory power akin to a hormone. The study’s biggest blunder is treating all nicotine as identical, when natural nicotine from sun-grown tobacco is biophysically distinct from synthetic versions.
Sunlight depletes deuterium in water used by tobacco plants, lowering the deuterium-to-hydrogen ratio (~150 ppm) in nicotine’s structure. This alters bond vibrations in its pyridine ring, slowing metabolism and enhancing bioactivity compared to synthetic nicotine, which uses varied reagents. Sunlight’s electromagnetic spectrum further tunes the pyridine ring’s π-electron system, optimizing its receptor interactions and signaling efficiency. Synthetic nicotine, made under artificial conditions, lacks this finesse.
The article’s blanket condemnation of nicotine ignores these isotopic and photophysical differences, falsely equating natural nicotine’s benefits with tobacco’s harms. By focusing on preclinical studies with high-dose nicotine or tobacco-derived compounds, the article distorts reality, linking nicotine to tumor growth and treatment resistance without solid human evidence. It brushes off nicotine’s role in smoking cessation, where NRT boosts quit rates and improves cancer outcomes, yet warns against nicotine products based on flimsy data. This is biophysical nonsense—nicotine’s clean molecular actions reduce oxidative stress, kill cancer cells via apoptosis, and regulate cellular health, making it a weapon against disease. The authors’ ignorance of biophysics—nicotine’s ETC binding, nAChR signaling, and natural isotopic advantages—produces a narrative that’s not just wrong but dangerously misleading, scaring people away from a molecule that could save lives when used right. Physics rules, and nicotine’s molecular dance proves its worth, not the fearmongering this study peddles.
@HustleBitch_ One correction: Type 1 diabetes in NOT "Insulin Resistance". Type 1 diabetes: the pancreas is NOT making insulin. Type 2 diabetes is an "insulin resistance" in the cell problem.
🚨 “EVERY VIRUS ON EARTH IS BEATEN WITH NICOTINE.”
⚠️ Reverses brain tumors in 72 hours
⚠️ Cures Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, MS
⚠️ Kills COVID
⚠️ Cures diabetes, arthritis
⚠️ Reduces autistic behaviors
Now do you see why they want it banned