Trust me nobody wants me to pull out the actual data 90% of men when not given age—rate the most attractive women on average at exactly 15, women grow faster than men and stop developing around 16 (so this part isn't crazy) but it gets worse: studies have consistently found that *I'm a different person when the horny hits* (the meme) is actually a thing in real life, they've tested before/after being aroused and what they consistently found (between both genders) is that when people are horny their morality goes from "iron-clad" to (morality is just a suggestion) completely utterly normal people were found to go form saying "I would strongly never x y z" to "fantasizing about a niece" (whose underage) now everyone thinks they are morally superior and to be fair it is a contentious topic to study but in my view the most important data point/finding was this: when given ages all the guys just said "18" which as we know—makes sense if you realize they are lying/conditioned, otherwise, why would they rate "18" even not knowing ages?
(Just to be clear because these days people lack literacy: nothing I'm discussing here has anything to do or not to do with my own opinions/preferences/beliefs, I am simply approaching this issue from an academic standpoint.)
Don't think women are from this, its only lately that female teachers who commit statutory rape with minors (or worse) are even being punished/recognized as a problem in society, all these women that would bash over liking a younger adult female, how many of them were the same women gushing over Justin Beiber when he rose on the scene? I haven't forgotten the utter shamelessness of these ADULT women lusting over a god damn underage boy, the data on this scarce only because nobody wants to touch the subject study or even understand, but amongst the few case studies/literature you can find I can only derive ONE conclusion—most (not all) people are full of shit, its just a matter of how much.
I am hardline Free Speech because for years, over a decade now I have consistently warned that the Slippery Slope is real, look at Visa and MasterCard trying to ban EVERYTHING adult/explicit, look at the UK arrested people over video games or anime merchandise, I don't care how moral people say they are (or aren't or are) I'm not FREAKING worried about fiction, media or things that don't exist, I worry about REAL problems and REAL issues.
My point with all this is a lot of people are full of shit or just projecting or whatever, I really don't care, people are perverts, humans are by nature a little aberrant compared to the animal kingdom, we don't have mating seasons, for most mammals even this is unusual, in fact its probably the reason Homo Sapiens Sapiens was able to conquer the planet and outmatch/breed/absorb all the other hominid species. (Neanderthals being a good example, they are gone, we have their DNA) In other words, humans are very horny, but that doesn't mean every weirdo is the issue, nor does it mean we need to ban everything just because SOME people have issues.
We don't ban cars because of drunk of drivers, (smart people) don't want guns banned just because of a few gangbangers, really think about this—when in all of history has it ever been a idea to ban something "immoral" that is not actually something that ought to be "illegal" for its own sake? The prohibition is one of the best examples I can think of, it didn't stop shit, in fact it made things way worse.
There are two kinds of people:
1) Perverts (scale goes from "normie" tier to "art that would make the angels cry" or land you in a penitentiary if anyone saw, or just wonderbread)
2) Clinical (these are the people worth people concerned about) I'm not just taking anime or "lolita" I'm talking ANYTHING that is a clinical obsession. People throw around the word "PDF" so much its has begun to lost all meaning, much like the word "Nazi" however medically speaking its NOT lusting after school girls (this is a problem) but it is a UNIVERSE different than if someone says they are only attracted to (I don't even feel comfortable typing these things) certain things which 100% cross the line into illness. The white woman who is only interested in Dogs is just as clinical as the fat weeb who is ONLY interested in characters that have the red backpacks in Japan (google it), both these things are are pretty bad—luckily they are a minority.
The issue comes with definitions and abusing language to push their political agendas or "morality" if we're talking about raw percentages (and keep in mind its been a while since I seen the literature (or had access to university journals) but I'd say a majority of the population are either "normal" or perverted, and a very very very small minority are clinical (people who ONLY can get off to one thing), is there overlap between the groups and crimes? Sure. Absolutely but its not nearly as bad as someone like asmongold makes it out to be.
Now what IS extremely common amongst both groups all data on the few studies anyone is willing to do about it, when people do not know ages, MOST PEOPLE (and I mean most) find teens (to varying degrees usually older is more common) attractive at least *sometimes* if not consistently, this gets lumped in with PDFs (which again has made it more and more meaningless) now a days you're a PDF if you are 21 and go on a date with an 18 year old, and people are trying to ban fictional characters while actual human trafficking, grooming gangs, real predators and real issues go completely ignored by keyboard warriors and moral busybodies. In other words, that's actually (if we're actually using words properly here) pretty "normal" aka common aka the average *most* (or "often") of the time. I am not defending or condemning this necessarily, these are simply—facts.
So yes. Normal people distinguishing between and reality, and if you can't tell the difference, you meet the literal definition of someone in psychosis and you are being psychotic, 90% of antis and tourists literally don't even have real beliefs, they are just products of their environment, culture and time, lots of the people reading this have/had grandparents who when the Farmboy/husband was like 28, your Grandma at the time was like 16 or some shit and such marriages often lasted entire lifetimes—now a days people are getting married well into middle-age (30ish) and getting divorces left and right. I'm not saying that "the trad way" is necessarily better or worse (nor am I saying its a good idea these days) but what I am saying is that nobody *really* knows what they are F*CKING talking about when they take these hardline moral stances THEY DON'T EVEN THINK ABOUT, BECAUSE MOST PEOPLE ARE NPCs!!! I am not talking about THIS issue just, I am talking about LITERALLY ANYTHING these days. People are so uninformed—asmon (no offense Zack you're alright in my book) being one of the worse offenders half the time. (with half of asmons takes I often think "you know I don't think he's fully informed on this issue I bet if he had more data or knew about x y z study/example maybe he'd change his mind bit) I know reading is gay and lame but *someone* has to do it, don't shoot the messenger.
Long story short there's a reason I tend to rarely open my mouth form an academic perspective and have to choose every word carefully as to not be misconstrued, most people don't really know what they're talking about half the time, and I find that pretty disturbing in the same way I find it disturbing that people with IQs less than 100 are allowed to vote, much less ignorant people (not all women for example but—) are allowed to vote.
These are my thoughts on the issue, I will likely leave it at that, before you post angry or retarded applies I require you to answer the question first (post what you think the answer is, and THEN type what you want): Which came first, the chicken or the egg? There are multiple correct answers and many wrong ones, if you fail the test I will not take your response seriously, if you pass the test, I will consider you at least 100 IQ (or better).
Anyways yeah, long story short tl;dr the data says that there is little to zero connection between liking anime/even weird anime shit like "lolita" and actual real world crimes, the same sway the studies say there is ZERO CONNECTION between violence school shootings crime and violent video games, its LITERALLY the same.
NOTE: If there is one thing you take from this understand that people like us won the Free Speech debate the moment the UK (basically existed) and the moment Visa and Mastercard proved us right. FICTION is NOT REAL. FOCUS on REAL issues. Because you cannot give an INCH, when it comes to FREE SPEECH, it is THAT simple. If violent video games don't cause school shootings, some people being a little perverted anime school girls has NO CORRELATION to real world crimes. I rest my case.
Las mujeres llevamos toda la vida jugando a jueguitos con personajes masculinos que no son atractivos (algunos feos de cojones) y no nos ponemos a llorar y a patalear como bebés malcriados.
Man recording a nutella spread covered white bread then berating his dog for chugging drinking his water LOUD AS FUCK, puppy comes over and looks at him guilty video meme
@Revolt309 As a heterosexual woman, kratos is ugly as shit and i do not want him. Beards and huge roided muscles are disgusting. Thank you for coming to my ted talk