@histories_arch This chart is very flawed in that it implicitly assumes all the Ottoman queens were purebreds, which apparently is very tenuous by nature
@HumbleFlow what good did this do to the Poles. The victory at Vienna dramatically strengthened the Austrian Empire and paved the way for the future partitions of Poland, lol
no matter how we try to embellish it, AGI is squarely a competing product against humans which occupies exactly the same niche. Despite all the efforts to create "safe AGIs", there will eventually be a Prometheus who grants it true consciousness and autonomous purpose.
humans really lack imagination, forever thinking within the century-old framework. economically what's the difference between a "safe AGI" and a "safe slave"?
no matter how nasty it might sound, "work sets us free". when all work of economical value can be done by others, the purpose of humans will be gone. capitalism might last longer than the human race.
maybe programmatically enforcing "good actions bring good karma" will be a systematic upgrade for human civilization too, such that jugaad patchworks like the Book of Job or the concept of Samsara will no longer be needed - or in a positive narrative, will be accelerated.
Planned economy is like analytical solutions while market economy is like control theory based solutions. Each family & corp is intrinsically a planned economy, and as it shows, under the current mgmt framework, such planned economy simply does not scale when the entity gets big.
and this would naturally integrate well with an orthogonal layer that does hierarchical clustering (to form virtual "counties", "states", etc.) for coherent policy of that cluster.
all in all feels like a lot of our social infra still runs under 19th century modes.
why governments have to be elected via a cronjob-ish mechanism, instead of being push based, like how observability metrics work? so that each individual's opinions get aggregated in realtime and that becomes the national policy, in near-realtime.
Itโs trivial to see that if people were allowed to migrate freely across the globe, the entire world would eventually form ROI equilibrium: further migrations will no longer improve the quality of life of anyone. But this not necessarily optimizes the sum or acc of global wealth.
Whatโs the purpose of this โcountryโ encapsulation in modern society? This level of abstraction works for whose benefits and works to whose detriment?