@BeckyKillinMore Why? We loved it. Nice to see them having a bit of fun, not every post credits scene needs to tee the next thing up. So much entitlement.
@edgarwright Always watch with subtitles since having a kid. With the way some sound mixes are these days, it's amazing how much information you can get from a film when you actually know everything being said!
@formularacers_@sergiorf97 Who is in the wrong here? Most European circuits not bankrolled by entire countries are struggling to finance F1 fees as it is (and the income from that one weekend will be a huge part of their annual turnover). The FIA, ultimately, decided to run the farce of a race.
@wtf1official I highly recommend a trip to the Festival of Speed at Goodwood if you want to see perhaps more retired F1 cars than anywhere on earth being driven (often at some pace). For the recent cars especially it's always an interesting mix of new liveries, older designs and loud engines!
@adrianmckinty Scott Pilgrim in Boston was my first experience of an audience actually reacting to a movie, it took until Infinity War/End Game to hear anything close here in the UK. Happily, the screening of Spider-Man at my local Odeon on Wednesday was bonkers, cheering, clapping etc.
@KermodeMovie@wittertainment Our screening (7pm Wednesday night, sleepy Wiltshire) was amazing, sold out, massive cheers and round of applause at least 3 times during the film and 99% of people staying right through till the second credits scene. After End Game I didn't think we'd see that again for years.
@dazzra @tomracinguk @NadiaWanheda@SkySportsF1 Not to mention the FIA are responsible for certifying the circuit from a safety perspective. Formula One Group actually negotiate with countries/circuits.
@SkySportsF1 Seems to be some (ok, a lot) of confusion about what the FIA actually do here. The FIA is the governing body, responsible for safety, regulations etc for various championships, not just F1. The Formula One Group is responsible for the commercial side of the sport.
@EdwardIRL@andrewbensonf1 Overlooking the more troubling aspects of your post, she is still the CEO of a Mercedes linked team in an FIA championship. I don't think it's any coincidence that this comes on the morn of the appeal deadline, she is perfectly positioned to 'set the scene' for what comes later
@fhedzani @wbuxtonofficial And you trust them to do that? At the very least, I hope Mercedes demand a full review and review clarification, even in the knowledge that the result won't be overturned. It's in everyone's interest for this not to be 'dropped' if you value sporting integrity.
@CallumFreckles@formularacers_@RacingLines Also, knowing a few travelling F1 team members, they'd take any opportunity they get for another day at home with their families.
@CallumFreckles@formularacers_@RacingLines Don't Mercedes still give every single team member, at every level, a £10,000 bonus for winning the WCC? I'm not sure many of them are going to be particuarly fussed by a photoshoot that most of them won't be part of anyway.
@DoubleTechnicaI @feeschod @SimonWeeks1 @SamWise24@Sam_malloc @chainbear Why do Sainz, Tsunoda etc not get the same opportunities to race to the line properly? The championship battle should be irrelevant to the RD, that's a very slippery slope when they can make decisions for entertainment purposes.
@DoubleTechnicaI @feeschod @SimonWeeks1 @SamWise24@Sam_malloc @chainbear So no safety issue: check. Next thing is to ensure regulations are adhered to, regulations that (for example) Mercedes strategists work to when deciding whether to risk pitting Lewis for tyres or not. If you can make thing up 'for the show' where do you draw the line?