Top Tweets for #Acausality

about 17 hours ago

𝐂𝐚𝐫𝐥 𝐉𝐮𝐧𝐠’𝐬 𝐖𝐢𝐥𝐝 𝐀𝐧𝐚𝐥𝐨𝐠𝐢𝐞𝐬: 𝐒𝐲𝐧𝐜𝐡𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐐𝐮𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐮𝐦 𝐏𝐡𝐲𝐬𝐢𝐜𝐬 Summary The essay examines #CarlJung’s attempt to link his psychological theories — specifically #synchronicity and #acausality — to principles of #quantumphysics, arguing that these connections rely strictly on conceptual analogies rather than direct scientific evidence. While acknowledgeable that analogies serve useful functions in theoretical science, philosophy, and cognition, the text highlights the risk of treating figurative metaphors as physical realities. #Jung posited synchronicity as an “acausal connecting principle” and cited “meaningful coincidences” — such as a patient dreaming of a scarab beetle right before a real one appeared — to argue against strict physical determinism and suggest connections between the mind and objective reality. However, the author contends that such internal links between thoughts and external occurrences are purely psychological, reflecting how individuals construct personal meaning rather than demonstrating physical acausality. When Jung and his collaborator, physicist #WolfgangPauli, drew parallels between synchronicity and quantum entanglement or statistical physics, they were employing structure-mapping models rather than identifying shared physical phenomena. Ultimately, the essay concludes that Jung’s usage of physics terminology functions as “scientese” — a rhetorical bridge meant to support his mystical framework — and that accepting these acausal claims requires adopting Jung’s personal psychological worldview rather than validated scientific principles. Analysis The text functions as a conceptual critique aimed at demystifying Jung’s core analytical frameworks. Stylistically, the author presents a structural breakdown by defining analogy, analyzing Jung’s specific claims on acausality, and contextualizing quantum entanglement as a theoretical model rather than a literal mechanism for mental phenomena. The commentary maintains a strictly logical focus: it evaluates the internal consistency of Jung’s definitions while remaining neutral toward the personal or therapeutic value that subjective “meaningful coincidences” may hold for individuals. — By Gemini Original essay here: https://t.co/7k3Px2dzG1

PaulAustinMurp2's tweet photo. 𝐂𝐚𝐫𝐥 𝐉𝐮𝐧𝐠’𝐬 𝐖𝐢𝐥𝐝 𝐀𝐧𝐚𝐥𝐨𝐠𝐢𝐞𝐬: 𝐒𝐲𝐧𝐜𝐡𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐐𝐮𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐮𝐦 𝐏𝐡𝐲𝐬𝐢𝐜𝐬

Summary

The essay examines #CarlJung’s attempt to link his psychological theories — specifically #synchronicity and #acausality — to principles of #quantumphysics, arguing that these connections rely strictly on conceptual analogies rather than direct scientific evidence. While acknowledgeable that analogies serve useful functions in theoretical science, philosophy, and cognition, the text highlights the risk of treating figurative metaphors as physical realities.

#Jung posited synchronicity as an “acausal connecting principle” and cited “meaningful coincidences” — such as a patient dreaming of a scarab beetle right before a real one appeared — to argue against strict physical determinism and suggest connections between the mind and objective reality. However, the author contends that such internal links between thoughts and external occurrences are purely psychological, reflecting how individuals construct personal meaning rather than demonstrating physical acausality.

When Jung and his collaborator, physicist #WolfgangPauli, drew parallels between synchronicity and quantum entanglement or statistical physics, they were employing structure-mapping models rather than identifying shared physical phenomena. Ultimately, the essay concludes that Jung’s usage of physics terminology functions as “scientese” — a rhetorical bridge meant to support his mystical framework — and that accepting these acausal claims requires adopting Jung’s personal psychological worldview rather than validated scientific principles.

Analysis

The text functions as a conceptual critique aimed at demystifying Jung’s core analytical frameworks. Stylistically, the author presents a structural breakdown by defining analogy, analyzing Jung’s specific claims on acausality, and contextualizing quantum entanglement as a theoretical model rather than a literal mechanism for mental phenomena. The commentary maintains a strictly logical focus: it evaluates the internal consistency of Jung’s definitions while remaining neutral toward the personal or therapeutic value that subjective “meaningful coincidences” may hold for individuals.

— By Gemini

Original essay here: https://t.co/7k3Px2dzG1

Venkatesh.K.N. @22venkateshN

over 10 years ago

@Ken_J_Murray @leisure3000 @6x10E23 @inky_r update ur knowledge on #CTCs at the quantum scales and #acausality. Then come back

Labsal Belhed @wobhulk

over 11 years ago

The little wings above your eyes are for the soul to pick up flight #Acausality #WingedSun

Top Tweets for #Acausality

Last Seen Hashtags on Sotwe

Trends for you

Most Popular Users