Top Tweets for #BiNodes
$LUNC Cosmos SDK 0.53 upgrade completed & running stably ✅
Our only goal: invite developers, data analysts and investors back to the #LUNC chain!
#BiNodes has launched its Open API platform. Anyone can deploy data applications with one click using AI agents, greatly reducing the difficulty of accessing on-chain data.
Get key data with just one AI prompt: on-chain rich list, active accounts, validator performance, transaction costs, IBC activity and more.
We have what you need; if not, we will do our best to provide it.
All for the community, all for LUNC!
🔗 Open API: https://t.co/difUh7IIEV
#LUNC #CosmosSDK #OpenAPI #Web3Dev #Blockchain #USTC
Many small $LUNC validators have been leaving one after another.
However, based on its Asian node, #BiNodes has just newly built a European node, achieving dual-node operation.
While others are exiting, we are increasing our investment,
because I see what most people cannot.
#LUNC #USTC
Hi everyone, I unfortunately have to close my validation as well; it's no longer worthwhile.
Please redelegate and I wish all other validators much success.
#LUNCcommunity
#LUNC #USTC #LCW #BURN
In the 24 hours since migrating our main $LUNC node to Europe, #BiNodes' monitoring dashboard has shown a beautiful straight line: Our missed blocks dropped to absolute zero, and P2P sync latency significantly decreased.
This is exactly why we insist on our dual-track global physical deployment, despite the surging server costs. Pump and dump charts are just cheap emotions;
millisecond responses in a node terminal are the true physical proof that this network is alive.
Architecture is stable. Moving towards a seamless high-concurrency network. ⚡️
Welcome delegate to insist builder!
#LUNC #USTC
Hi $LUNC! 🌕
Migration Notification ✅:
Today, we have successfully completed the migration of #BiNodes ' main validator node from Asia to Europe.
Since Europe’s network is geographically closer to the majority of validators, this move effectively reduces network latency and minimizes missed blocks.
Please note: Our LCD and RPC endpoints, as well as the upcoming OPEN API (a high-performance statistical data service specifically engineered for AI and developers), will remain hosted in our Asia datacenter to ensure the fastest distributed access globally. 🌏
Operating dual-track datacenters in both Europe and Asia significantly increases our overhead costs.
However, as part of our global service strategy, we have decided to increase our investment to ensure top-tier reliability.
Keep building! 💪🏻
#LUNC #TerraClassic #Validator #Web3Builder #BiNodes #Mainnet #GlobalExpansion #USTC
Amid Jane Street scandal & burn news, $LUNC got hot money inflow.
But hot money dumps at 20% profit.
Capital has no loyalty.
BiNodes servers keep running, ledger keeps syncing.
A chain’s real power comes from long-term builders.🌲
#LUNC #TerraClassic #BiNodes
A screen full of red? 💀
Remember: Contracts can go to zero, but physical tokens are king. Don't fall at the darkest hour before dawn. Hold onto your tokens tightly and delegate your #LUNC to the #BiNodes.
Rather than worrying about the shrinkage of your account, it's better to sleep while earning staking interest. We'll keep watch for you. 🛡️
$LUNC #TerraClassic #HODL #Staking
The passing of the proposal is just the beginning; execution is the real test. 🛠️
The proposal for the #LUNC Cosmos SDK v0.53 upgrade has been approved, and the #BiNodes team is conducting synchronous testing on the testnet.
Compiling terrad, calling LCD, synchronizing blocks, checking logs... The daily work of validators is dull, but it is this dull work that ensures zero downtime during the mainnet upgrade and the quality of the community public data API service.
The more stable the technical foundation, the higher $LUNC can soar.
#LUNC #Validator #DevOps #CosmosSDK #BiNodes
🚀 terra classic Proposal \'Spending Proposal: Terra Classic Upgrade to Cosmos SDK v0.53 with IBC v2 (Eureka) Support - Phase 1\' is Passed: Terra Classic governance proposal to upgrade to Cosmos SDK v0.53 with IBC v2 support passed on Jan 29, 2026, with 99.9% affirmative votes and no strong opposition..
URL: https://t.co/PyiN7pxyfH
"Friday grind. 🛠️
optimizing the data snapshot pipeline for #LUNC. Building robust data services for the community and our delegates.
Real utility takes time, but BiNodes is here for the long run. 🧱
#TerraClassic #LUNCCommunity #Dev #BiNodes
Between #Christmas and #NewYear's Day
The #BiNodes validation node servers are still operating at full capacity, validating every #LUNC transaction. We ensure the network runs smoothly during the holiday period.
Safety and stability are our bottom lines💪🏻
The last Monday of 2025. 🗓️
While everyone is enjoying the holidays, the validation nodes are still producing blocks every minute and second. Taking advantage of these days at the end of the year, I am reviewing the performance data of the #BiNodes node over the past year and planning the infrastructure upgrade plan for 2026.
Ensuring that the #LUNC network has stronger resilience and faster response speed in the new year is my top priority. What are your expectations for the $LUNC ecosystem next year?
#LUNC This is by far the most objective, fair and comprehensive view I've seen regarding the USTD proposal. #StrathCole is a highly respected community member. Regardless of the final outcome of the USTD proposal, I can't wait to buy back $LUNC and stake it on #BiNodes Validator.
Dear #LUNCcommunity,
coming to a conclusion on proposal #12192 (@RedlineDrifter USTD) has not been an easy task.
The idea of the yield-bearing stable as a native token and protocol on the chain is appealing, the potential income for the chain is promising. But as well as this is a chance, it is a risk. A failure of a protocol launched on-chain has different implications than a failure of a protocol launched by the chain.
With paying for and thus owning a protocol, the chain inherits both the potentials and the risks. If adopted, the potential could be massive in terms of income for the chain and reducing $LUNC / $USTC supply, but major issues and/or failures would fall back on the chain as well.
Given the decentralized nature, and that the chain is driven by all its contributors (including projects built on chain) during the past years, this includes potential effects on those projects in case of a negative event.
I think the idea itself seems solid and promising per se. It could be attracting niche users (and while niche sounds like only a few, the “pool” is big). It could bring badly needed income to the chain. Yet after all things considered, all discussions with RedlineDrifter of the past days reflected, I think the chain itself should not fund it from the Community Pool.
Although the project itself is drafted as decentralized as it can be (given the current technology available), it has some inherent semi-centralized components and areas of operation that are not easy to mitigate or “keep under control”.
First, the bridging of funds is a concern. The main application would reside on Terra Classic, but most of the collateral would be off-chain (otherwise the yield-fetching would not work). This means that not all users could withdraw their funds, or, if a lot of liquidity would be kept on chain, the yield would be significantly lower (less percentage in the liquidity pools earning fees). In case of any sort of bridging issues (on either side), the funds could be stuck for a short period of time, which could be a marketing disaster.
Second, the semi-centralized components need multisig-wallets to work as at the current state they cannot be controlled by #TerraClassic governance directly (Akash does not support Interchain Accounts). The past has shown that it can be a lengthy and controversial process to find and approve the necessary people for that (although it also can be quick, see liquidity provision of USDC). These parts of the protocol are fundamental to its inner workings, though. They will need regular attention of the multisig-holders.
Third, although the executing company’s legal department judges the protocol “fine” in terms of regulations, we need to keep in mind that a different legal judgement would not only affect the protocol itself, in case that happened. It would affect the chain itself, too. While the protocol would be decentralized, Circle (CCTP) and Teather are not.
Fourth, I am not sure chain governance would be capable of running this kind of business or make the best decisions for the interest of the protocol as there might be several conflicts of priorities or interest. The "reaction speed" is also a concern in this context.
Point five is a question of philosophy. While a chain-owned protocol could benefit the chain directly, it also could compete with third-party protocols and potentially lower the attractiveness for builders, if the chain prefers its own products. This (the chain going for MEV) could go against the free-for-all idea where Terra Classic is just the “infrastructure”.
There are some more, rather minor items that would be too much for this text to add here.
Just to repeat, I find the idea and concept appealing, and I would very likely invest in a credible project delivered on Terra Classic implementing just that, but I am hesitant to give a “consent” to the chain itself funding it because of the broader implications.
And to be clear, it would not matter if it would be done on L1 or L2, as soon as the CP/Chain pays for it, it is owned and as such deeply tied to the chain itself. This in turn means it would have implications on all projects building on this chain.
This conclusion has nothing to do with the individuals behind the concept/proposal, nor has it to do with the amount of funds that would be paid from the CP or the concept itself. Contrary, I’d love to see it become a reality as a non-chain-owned L2 project on this chain, maybe through a “governance token” launch, where the funding is paid to the development company, and where the gov token holders gain part of the fees later and govern the protocol as it is intended in the whitepaper (just that it’s chain governance there). I say that knowing this would have some downsides (no chain-native token, no MM utilization, …) and would lead to less income for the chain than it being chain-owned. Still it could have positive side-effects on user inflow, liquidity and PR even in this case.
Cheers.
🔥 terra classic New Proposal Voting: Terra Classic community votes on USTD proposal: a decentralized, automated yield-bearing stablecoin. Key features include decentralization, automation via smart contracts, yield generation, and stability pegged to USD. Voting with LUNC tokens open until [Voting Deadline]. More info: [Discourse](https://t.co/zPteLgU9SS), [Common XYZ](https://t.co/aE3ajgmLr5)..
URL: https://t.co/JDqaYKI5Qk
#LUNC #USTC #LUNCcommunity #LUNC1DOLLAR #USTC1DOLLAR #USTCREPEG #Luncarmy #TerraClassic
![BInodes_'s tweet photo. 🔥 terra classic New Proposal Voting: Terra Classic community votes on USTD proposal: a decentralized, automated yield-bearing stablecoin. Key features include decentralization, automation via smart contracts, yield generation, and stability pegged to USD. Voting with LUNC tokens open until [Voting Deadline]. More info: [Discourse](https://t.co/zPteLgU9SS), [Common XYZ](https://t.co/aE3ajgmLr5)..
URL: https://t.co/JDqaYKI5Qk
#LUNC #USTC #LUNCcommunity #LUNC1DOLLAR #USTC1DOLLAR #USTCREPEG #Luncarmy #TerraClassic](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G1JwzMOaQAAZwfa.jpg)
These are the top 5 #TerraClassic validators ranked by self-stake amount as of August 1, 25.
1. @Allnodes
2. @BInodes_
3. @LUNCBurnProgram
4. @0baseVC
5. Rivinchey Hex
3/9
The #BiNodes validator continued to buy and self-stake today, locking up its circulation. Up to today, it has accumulated a considerable amount of earnings. Most of the floating profits are due to the low-price repurchase from those who gave up their beliefs during the #LUNC crisis. Today, I can meet my living needs with the interest, so I can ensure that there is a continuous stream of income without ever selling $LUNC. And this is just the beginning. Time will reward those who don't give up their beliefs. If you can also think reversely and be patient, time and wealth will surely be on your side.
These are the top 5 #TerraClassic validators ranked by self-stake amount as of June 1, 25.
1. @Allnodes
2. @LUNCBurnProgram
3. @0baseVC
4. @BInodes_
5. @BitCat365
3/9
Last Seen Hashtags on Sotwe
Trends for you
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
240.4M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119.3M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.7M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
110M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
97.5M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.1M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
90.8M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
87.3M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
81.2M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
72.7M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
69.6M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
69.4M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.6M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
63.7M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.5M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
62.1M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.9M followers
X
@x
60.9M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
60.4M followers