Top Tweets for #CONCLUSIONS
I hereby #recommend you #study the #chart and #draw right #conclusions…
1 : 1
#BTC
#Bitcoin
#Binance
#HODL
సుముఖతతో ఉండటం అంటే ఎటువంటి నిర్ధారణలూ లేకుండా - ప్రతిదానినీ ఉన్నది ఉన్నట్లుగా చూడటమే.
Openness means no conclusions – simply looking at everything the way it is.
#Sadhguru #Sadhgurutelugu #TeluguQuotes #Openness #conclusions
Tailored #visuals can #blur your #perspective & cloud your #judgement . Do not jump to #conclusions .
మీరు ఎంత ఎక్కువగా నిర్ధారణలు ఏర్పరచుకుంటారో, అంతగా నిర్జీవంగా అవుతారు.
The more conclusions you make, the less Alive you become.
#Sadhguru #SadhguruTelugu #SadhguruQuotes #Conclusions #Aliveness
🎥Comparative Analysis of the #Claims, #Arguments, #Evidence, and #Conclusions of Two Experts Who Take the #RiskOfWorldWarIII Seriously👇👇
👈 Jiang Xueqin (@xueqinjiang): Geopolitical analyst who, using game theory, has made three precise predictions (Trump’s victory, the war on Iran, and America’s defeat), and Professor Branko Milanovic (@BrankoMilan): Former lead economist at the World Bank (nearly two decades in the Research Department), Research Professor at the City University of New York Graduate Center, Visiting Professor at the London School of Economics, and author of The Great Global Transformation.
🔺 Jiang Xueqin expressed his views in two recent interviews with Steven Bartlett (@StevenBartlett) and Theo Von (@TheoVon). Professor Branko Milanovic presented his perspectives yesterday in an interview with Afshin Rattansi (@afshinrattansi).
✅ 1 – Core Claims Regarding World War III
🔹*Jiang Xueqin:**
1.1 The war against Iran has an 80 to 90 percent probability of leading to World War III.
1.2 If the Ukrainian and Iranian fronts merge, “all bets are off,” resulting in World War III accompanied by systemic and civilizational collapse.
1.3 The best-case scenario is that the Iran war becomes America’s new Vietnam; the worst-case scenario is the merger of fronts and descent into global war.
1.4 Four conflicting grand strategies (America, Russia, Israel, Iran) are on an inevitable collision course, making World War III unavoidable.
🔹*Branko Milanovic:**
1.1 The world stands on the brink of World War III exactly as it did in the summer of 1914.
1.2 Clear and war-ready coalitions have taken shape: China–Russia–Iran versus Europe and the United States.
1.3 Four years of walking on the precipice in the Ukraine war will eventually lead to a fall, and the Iran war has brought that fall much closer.
1.4 The peak of economic globalization coinciding with the worst political situation since World War II has made a major war more probable than at any other time.
✅ 2 – Detailed Arguments for the Occurrence of World War III
🔹*Jiang Xueqin:**
2.1 Game theory shows that every actor (the United States, Iran, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Russia, China) is optimizing its own interests. Ukraine, losing a war of attrition, seeks to merge the fronts in order to fully draw America into the conflict.
2.2 The escalation ladder between the United States and Iran: from a decapitation strike against the leadership, to closing the Strait of Hormuz, economic strangulation, attacks on critical infrastructure, and ultimately the risk of tactical nuclear weapons that would end civilization.
2.3 Closure of the Strait of Hormuz cuts 20% of the world’s oil, while closure of the Bab el-Mandeb adds another 7%. This would trigger famine in Africa, economic collapse across East Asia, and massive migration waves into Europe, globalizing the war.
2.4 Four conflicting grand strategies:
- America: Fortress America + global chaos
- Russia: Third Rome (unification of the Christian world and Eurasia)
- Israel: Greater Israel (from the Nile to the Euphrates)
- Iran: Unification of the Muslim world under Shia leadership
The collision of these four strategies renders World War III inevitable.
2.5 The Greater Israel project and secret societies (Freemasons, Jesuits, the Jewish diaspora, and the continuing Illuminati tradition), together with apocalyptic eschatology, are the structural drivers of the war.
🔹*Branko Milanovic:**
2.1 Complete structural similarity with World War I: Before 1914 the theory of the “impossibility of war due to economic interdependence” already existed (authors such as Ivan Bloch and Norman Angell). War nevertheless broke out and killed 20 to 30 million people. Today exactly the same illusion is being repeated at the peak of globalization.
2.2 War-ready coalitions: Before 1914 the French army was called the “Army of Revenge.” Today the coalitions are clearer than ever, and people remain unaware of the consequences and optimistic (just as those in 1914 who said “we shall be home by Christmas”).
2.3 The classic argument of Hobson, Rosa Luxemburg, and Lenin: Globalization produces competition among large corporations for markets, colonies, cheap labor, and monopoly profits. These corporations use state and military power to eliminate rivals (today’s example: the role of Elon Musk’s (@elonmusk) Starlink).
2.4 Military Keynesianism: Western countries that have lost the industrial competition with China have replaced car production with tank production. This raises GDP but is useless from the standpoint of human welfare and prepares the environment for major war.
2.5 The end of the “end of history” ideology and the rise of a dangerous new combination: preserving neoliberalism at home (lower taxes for capital) while abandoning it abroad (tariffs, protectionism, military coercion). This combination precisely creates the conditions for global war.
✅ 3 – Key Evidence Related to World War III
🔹*Jiang Xueqin:**
3.1 Three precise predictions from 2024 that were fully realized, validating the game-theory method.
3.2 East Asia’s heavy dependence on Persian Gulf oil (Japan 75%, China 40%, India 50–60%) and the Middle East’s dependence on food and fertilizer transiting the straits.
3.3 General Wesley Clark’s (@GeneralClark) statements about the post-9/11 plan to attack seven countries, ending with Iran.
3.4 Iran’s “Mosaic” strategy (decentralization of command into 31 independent provincial armies) and practical control of the Strait of Hormuz.
3.5 The presence of 10,000 to 12,000 North Korean troops in Ukraine and the risk of war expanding into the North Caucasus.
🔹*Branko Milanovic:**
3.1 The books of Ivan Bloch and Norman Angell before 1914 that spoke of the “impossibility of war” exactly as people do today.
3.2 The World Bank’s $90 billion “PEACE” program for Ukraine (the largest in the Bank’s history), which in practice finances war.
3.3 The urgent sale of euros to buy yen by the U.S. Treasury to prevent Japan from selling U.S. Treasuries (a sign of the dollar empire’s last gasps).
3.4 The direct role of Elon Musk’s Starlink in determining the outcome of the Russia–Ukraine war as an example of private capital’s involvement in warfare.
3.5 The revision of the tactical nuclear weapons doctrine by Trump’s (@realDonaldTrump) Department of War and the UN estimate of 32 million additional people pushed into poverty.
✅ 4 – Final Conclusions Regarding World War III
🔹**Jiang Xueqin:**
4.1 The Iran war is not a tactical mistake but the structural outcome of the Greater Israel project and the interests of transnational capital. If the fronts merge, World War III and civilizational collapse become inevitable.
4.2 America is trapped in a classic escalation ladder: either accept emerging Iranian hegemony or risk tactical nuclear use and systemic collapse.
4.3 The only way to prevent total collapse at both the individual and collective levels is collective awakening, questioning official narratives, and focusing on love, family, God, and laughter; for we are spiritual beings trapped in a material matrix.
🔹**Branko Milanovic:**
4.1 The world stands on the brink of World War III, exactly as in the summer of 1914. Coalitions are ready, the illusion of the “impossibility of war” prevails, and large corporations are using the state and the military for their own interests.
4.2 The current wars (Iran, Gaza, Ukraine) are neither accidental nor the result of personal decisions; they are the structural product of capitalism in the final stage of globalization and of monopolistic corporate competition.
4.3 The only way to prevent the fall is the immediate cessation of shooting and the convening of a major international conference on the scale of Vienna, Versailles, or Yalta. Without it, the fall will be inevitable. Those who do not know history treat war as a game; war is not a game.
✅ 5 – Points of Convergence, Fundamental Differences, Intellectual Foundations, and Other Voices
🔹**Points of Convergence:**
- Both regard the risk of World War III as very serious, imminent, and structural (not accidental or personal).
- Both emphasize the role of large capital and states in escalating war.
- Both consider civilizational or systemic collapse possible in the worst-case scenario.
- Both compare the current situation to dangerous historical patterns.
🔹**Fundamental Differences and Intellectual Foundations:**
Branko Milanovic comes from the tradition of left-wing political economy (close to Marxist and neo-Marxist traditions). His primary point of departure is monopoly capitalism, neoliberalism, and the end of neoliberal globalization. He sees war as the structural consequence of the logic of capital and moves precisely in the lineage of Hobson, Rosa Luxemburg, and Lenin. His solution is institutional and political: a major peace conference.
Jiang Xueqin’s intellectual foundation is entirely different and not left-wing. His three main pillars are:
1. Game theory as the central analytical tool
2. Classical geopolitics and grand strategies
3. The Greater Israel project + secret societies and apocalyptic eschatology
He more closely resembles a geopolitical realist with civilizational and mildly conspiratorial leanings. He regards war as the inevitable collision of conflicting civilizational grand strategies, not merely the product of capital. His solution is more individual and spiritual: collective awakening + focus on love, family, God, and laughter.
📢**Other Explicit Voices on the Risk of World War III:**
🔴1. Paul Poast, Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago: Has explicitly stated that “we are already in a world war” (due to the linkage between the Iran and Ukraine wars).
🔴2. Robert Reich (@RBReich), former U.S. Secretary of Labor: Has described the Iran war as “the precipice of World War III.”
🔴3. Richard Shirreff, former British Army general and Deputy Supreme Allied Commander Europe: Has called the Iran war “the final catalyst for a third world war.”
🔴4. Niall Ferguson (@nfergus), prominent historian: Has written multiple articles asking “Could this be the start of World War III?” and taken the risk seriously.
🔴5. Volodymyr Zelensky (@ZelenskyyUa): Has explicitly stated that Putin “has already started World War III.”
◀️When so many serious experts speak of the risk of World War III (with probabilities ranging from low to very high), we must keep our ears fully open and at least listen to their voices. Pressure must be brought to bear on the warmongers (and at their head Netanyahu (@netanyahu), Trump, the neocons, Putin, Zelensky, and others) for ending the wars. The anti-war movement must be fully activated on a global scale. The “Epstein class” that rules us profits from war and feeds on the blood of the world’s people.
🎥 Why did #Mojtaba_Khamenei oppose the #Islamabad_MOU (the 60-Day US-Iran Agreement) signed by Donald Trump and #Masoud_Pezeshkian? Why did he dismiss #Mohammad_Bagher_Zolghadr and replace him with #Mohsen_Rezaei as Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council? 👇👇
Note for international readers: Following the death of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in 2026, his son Mojtaba Khamenei became the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Under the doctrine of #Velayat_e_Faqih (Guardianship of the Islamic Jurist), all key state officials derive their legitimacy from the Leader’s appointment or approval. The Supreme National Security Council is Iran’s highest decision-making body on national security and foreign policy. The #Stability_Front represents the most hardline faction within the Iranian political system, strongly opposed to any engagement with the United States. The #Islamabad_MOU is the short-term Memorandum of Understanding signed by Donald Trump (at the Palace of Versailles in the presence of Emmanuel Macron) and Masoud Pezeshkian. Both sides now accuse each other of violating it.
👈 Hardline radicals aligned with #Saeed_Jalili, the #Stability_Front, and state television claim that because #Mojtaba_Khamenei was completely opposed to the #Islamabad_MOU while #Masoud_Pezeshkian fully supported it, he dismissed #Mohammad_Bagher_Zolghadr for casting a positive vote in its favor.
✅ Why is this claim false?
🔺 First — #Mojtaba_Khamenei was initially opposed to the agreement; yet, upon the insistence of #Masoud_Pezeshkian, he stated that if two-thirds of the members of the Supreme National Security Council voted in its favor, he would also endorse it.
🔺 Second — With the sole exception of #Saeed_Jalili, every member of the Supreme National Security Council voted in favor of the agreement. This demonstrates the consensus-building capacity of #Masoud_Pezeshkian, who himself refers to the endeavor as the #Project_of_Concord.
🔺 Third — All military commanders are appointees and representatives of the Leader. Consequently, #Mojtaba_Khamenei would have been obliged to dismiss them all rather than issue new decrees reappointing every one of them as the country’s military commanders.
🔺 Fourth — The Head of the Judiciary (#Mohseni_Ejei) is likewise appointed directly by the Leader. #Mojtaba_Khamenei would therefore have been required to dismiss #Mohseni_Ejei as well, instead of issuing a new decree reappointing him to the presidency of the Judiciary amid extensive praise and commendation.
🔺 Fundamentally, according to the theory of #Velayat_e_Faqih, every official from the highest to the lowest ranks is an appointee and representative of the Leader and derives legitimacy from that fact. Even the President, who is elected by direct popular vote, received letters of appointment from both #Ayatollah_Khomeini and #Ayatollah_Khamenei containing the formula: #I_hereby_appoint_you. At present, even #Masoud_Pezeshkian himself is a representative of #Mojtaba_Khamenei.
🔺 One should not entertain even a millionth of a doubt that had #Mojtaba_Khamenei wished his own view to prevail, he would have communicated it to them and every military and political leader would have complied one hundred percent.
🔺 It had been arranged that #Mohammad_Bagher_Qalibaf would sign the agreement on behalf of Iran. The moment #Mojtaba_Khamenei’s statement was issued containing the phrase #In_principle_I_held_a_different_view, #Mohammad_Bagher_Qalibaf — who was the chief negotiator of the agreement — refrained from signing it, and #Masoud_Pezeshkian signed it with pride. In other words, #Mohammad_Bagher_Qalibaf knew better than anyone that the text of the agreement had been submitted to #Mojtaba_Khamenei for approval twenty to thirty times and that each of his marginal amendments had been precisely incorporated into the final text.
📢 The resignation or dismissal of #Mohammad_Bagher_Zolghadr and the succession of #Mohsen_Rezaei in his place have other causes that must be examined independently.
@prettyrusslboy @Anitella_ just listening to both of their interviews you definitely can make some interesting #conclusions
@TimothyDooner @Daily_MailUS Cheers
Keep up the good work
No one reads that hate ridden shite 😁👍
#Conclusions
“So we love conclusions, not for there finality,
but for the space they carve between
what was and might be-
a quiet interval where grief and hope
sit together,
hand in hand,
waiting for the next line to begin.”
- “Friendship”
#conclusions
On se #demande parfois si tu fais semblant où tu es en toute #sincérité taré à ce point. Rien que ton sens de la formulation, l'#ordonnancement de tes idées (si elles sont vraiment les tiennes) et tes #conclusions nous instruisent sur ton profil : tu es un mercenaire inculte ou le prête-plume ne connaît rien du contexte pour lequel il #exerce. Pas besoin de faire Sciences Po
TOGO - Analysons le décret adopté en conseil des ministres cette 19/02/2026 portante création, attribution, organisation et fonctionnement de la direction des hautes personnalités et des institutions.
On entend par hautes personnalités le PCM et ses ministres, le PR, le président de l'assemblée nationale, le président du Sénat et leurs vices président respectifs sans oublier les directeurs généraux des banques et différents établissements publics ainsi le DG du trésor, le DG du port Autonome de Lomé, etc.
Le texte invoque un "contexte sécuritaire en mutation" et "l’accroissement de la visibilité internationale du Togo", mais sans jamais préciser quelles menaces concrètes justifient la création d’une direction spéciale regroupant police gendarmerie sous un commandement unique.
Pourquoi un tel décret maintenant ?
1. Centraliser le contrôle des forces de sécurité
Créer une direction unique, fusionnant police et gendarmerie pour protéger les “hautes personnalités”, permet :
- de réduire les contre pouvoirs internes ;
- de placer la protection rapprochée sous une chaîne de commandement plus politique ;
- d’éviter que différentes unités aient des loyautés divergentes.
Ce type de centralisation apparaît souvent dans les États où le pouvoir veut verrouiller son environnement immédiat.
2. Anticiper des tensions politiques internes
Même si le texte ne le dit pas, ce genre de dispositif est typique lorsque :
- des rivalités internes existent dans les forces de sécurité ;
- le pouvoir craint des défections, fuites ou contestations venant de l’intérieur.
Le décret parle de "cibles de menaces particulières", mais ne dit jamais lesquelles. C’est un signe de menace diffuse, souvent interne plutôt qu’externe.
3. Renforcer la protection protocolaire pour les événements internationaux
C’est l’argument officiel : le Togo accueille plus d’événements internationaux, donc il faut professionnaliser la protection.
Mais cet argument est faible, car :
- la protection protocolaire existe déjà dans la police et la gendarmerie ;
- un simple renforcement des unités existantes aurait suffi ;
- créer une nouvelle direction entière est disproportionné pour un motif purement protocolaire.
La création d’une unité mixte police gendarmerie dédiée aux personnalités sert à :
a) sécuriser le régime, pas seulement les individus;
b) surveiller l’environnement politique et
c) réduire les risques de coups internes.
Ce vocabulaire est typique d’une réorganisation stratégique du dispositif de protection du pouvoir.
Milawoe le 19/02/2026
Nous rejoindre Milawoe Telegram
https://t.co/6sVg2JHFO8
@KadoKero @GrandStratguer1 Elle n est pas disponible l #enquête #EpsteinFiles de 2019 ...
Parceque ,pour donner ses #conclusions un #policier doit être vivant....
Luigi being escorted vs Maduro being escorted
#Conclusions
Today's card is The Moon
Jumping to conclusions doesn't always give us the correct answers to our questions.
#perception #conclusions
#tarot #tarotmessage #LauraJK32
నిర్ధారణలు, స్పష్టత లేకుండానే మీకు ఆత్మవిశ్వాసాన్ని ఇస్తాయి. స్పష్టత లేని ఆత్మవిశ్వాసం ప్రమాదకరం.
#Sadhguru #SadhguruTelugu #Sadhguruquotes #Conclusions #Confidence #Clarity
Last Seen Hashtags on Sotwe
Polka
Seen from Poland
406nathecode
Seen from United States
dickewindel
Seen from Germany
mtfrazier
Seen from United States
NailColours
Seen from United States
omegle
Seen from United States
86yr
Seen from United States
ラクスタグラム旅
Seen from Japan
melibendeli
Seen from Turkey
PınBer
Seen from United States
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
241.7M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
114.5M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.9M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107.2M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98.7M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.4M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.8M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
90M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
84M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
75.5M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
73.4M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.9M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.8M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
66.5M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
65.2M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
63.1M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.3M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.8M followers
X
@x
60.7M followers