Top Tweets for #CarletonVote

over 1 year ago

🚨 Tomas Szuchewycz’s 91-candidate stunt in Carleton cost taxpayers & confused voters. Is this election interference? Demand RCMP/legal probe. #ElectionInterference #CarletonVote @El @ElectionsCan_E @CaptainDick12 @jamiljivani Public Plea for Legal Advocates, Police, and Citizens to Investigate Tomas Szuchewycz’s Longest Ballot Committee in Carleton I call on Canadians, legal advocates, police, and social media users to demand expert analysis of whether Tomas Szuchewycz and his Longest Ballot Committee’s actions in the 2025 Carleton election constitute election interference under the Canada Elections Act for a potential class action litigation. Szuchewycz’s protest, flooding Carleton’s ballot with 85 of 91 candidates, disrupted democracy. Share this plea to seek accountability. Key concerns: - Taxpayer Costs: The metre-long ballot spiked Elections Canada’s expenses, requiring extra ballot boxes, special trucks, extra fuel costs, and early counting, burdening taxpayers. -Voter Barriers: The complex ballot confused seniors and other voters, with residents like Sandy Tucker reporting lost independence. Chief @ElectionsCan_E Officer Stéphane Perrault warned of accessibility issues. -Non-Local Candidates: Many of Szuchewycz’s 85 candidates, like Michael Bednarski (Toronto) and Richard Rowat (Quebec), live far from Carleton, unaware of its location, and didn’t campaign, suggesting deliberate disruption. -Interference Risk: The ballot’s delays and confusion may violate Section 281(g) “election interference.” Targeting Pierre Poilievre’s Carleton but sparing Mark Carney’s riding raises bias concerns. Legal experts, RCMP, and electoral scholars: Assess if Szuchewycz’s actions broke laws or warrant lawsuits. Did non-local candidates violate Section 281(g)? Can taxpayers seek damages? Do accessibility harms breach fairness laws? Szuchewycz’s prior protests (91 candidates in LaSalle–Émard–Verdun, 84 in Toronto) delayed results and also had complaints of confusion and accessibility problems and added burdensome costs to taxpayers, showing a pattern. No direct legal precedents exist, but the Commissioner of Canada Elections and RCMP can investigate. Act Now: 👉🏻Experts & Police: Commit to analyse and report to the Canadian Public by May 15, 2025. 👉🏻Citizens: Share on X and other socials #ElectionInterference #CarletonVote 👉🏻File complaints at https://t.co/gAERFrDJ46. Demand Elections Canada adopt Perrault’s candidacy rule changes. Ensure fair elections! Share this plea and hold Szuchewycz accountable! @JCCFCanada @cef_cce @CCFR_CCDAF @TaxPayer If you witnessed or saw anything at a poll like several of us did, use the online complaint form

136

Top Tweets for #CarletonVote

Last Seen Hashtags on Sotwe

Trends for you

Most Popular Users