Top Tweets for #CorruptEU

Four Resets. A Billion for China. No Answers. Strip away the framing and Starmer's speech this morning reveals more than it intends. "Incremental change won't cut it," said the Prime Minister. He said this at his fourth reset in under two years. The first reset promised stability. The second promised delivery. The third promised a cost of living focus. The fourth promises urgency. The pattern is not a pivot. It is a confession, repeated at intervals, that the previous confession produced nothing. The substance amounted to this: do everything we were already doing, but announced with greater volume. Young people need hope, so more apprenticeships. Britain needs growth, so closer ties with Europe. British Steel needs saving, so nationalise it. Each announcement a repackaging of something already underway or already failing. Take British Steel. Starmer announced legislation this week to bring it into full public ownership. He presented this as bold, urgent action on the side of working people. The reality is that the government has been effectively running British Steel since April 2025, when emergency legislation was rushed through Parliament after the Chinese owner Jingye threatened to close the blast furnaces. Since then the taxpayer has provided approximately £419 million in working capital to keep the site alive. Steel production in Britain remains on a steep downward trend. And now, according to reports, Jingye is demanding over a billion pounds in compensation before agreeing to hand back a company the British taxpayer has been running and funding for over a year. Nationalising a patient already on life support and paying its previous Chinese owner a billion pounds for the privilege is not industrial policy. It is the formalisation of an existing liability with a price tag attached, announced this morning as though it were an achievement. On young people and hope: Labour priced a generation out of work. Youth unemployment surged to levels not seen in more than a decade, driven directly by the employer National Insurance rise, the surge in minimum wages and the consequent collapse in entry-level hiring across retail, hospitality and service industries. The ladder into work was kicked away in the name of fairness. This morning Starmer offered those young people more apprenticeships and a closer relationship with Brussels. Neither addresses what caused the problem. On Europe, the most significant moment was not what Starmer said but what he refused to say. Asked directly whether the next Labour manifesto would rule out rejoining the single market or the customs union, he declined to answer. The 2024 manifesto was explicit: no single market, no customs union, no freedom of movement. Voters were told this clearly and voted accordingly. Today Starmer opened the door and left it open. Not a reset. A destination, confirmed. The response to the speech from his own side told the story more honestly than the speech itself. A senior government source said he had said nothing new and feared the speech had pushed Labour into chaos. David Smith, the Labour MP for North Northumberland, became the 44th backbencher to demand his resignation within minutes of him finishing. Starmer's answer to all of it was that Labour would never be forgiven for the chaos of a leadership contest. It is the strongest card he has left. It is also the smallest one. A Prime Minister who is paying a Chinese company over a billion pounds to leave a business the taxpayer has been running for a year, and who opened the door to single market membership four days after the worst local election result in Labour's modern history, is not providing real answers. He is providing the appearance of them. Britain has seen this before. Three times, in fact. "Nationalising a patient already on life support and paying its previous Chinese owner a billion pounds for the privilege is not industrial policy."